La culpa es de la vaca PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download La culpa es de la vaca PDF full book. Access full book title La culpa es de la vaca by Jaime Lopera Gutiérrez. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Jaime Lopera Gutiérrez
Publisher:
ISBN: 9786280003009
Category :
Languages : es
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jaime Lopera Gutiérrez
Publisher:
ISBN: 9786280003009
Category :
Languages : es
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789587099379
Category :
Languages : es
Pages : 272
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Patricia Walker O'Connor
Publisher: Editorial Fundamentos
ISBN: 9788424507916
Category : Drama
Languages : en
Pages : 248
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: El Librero
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : es
Pages : 158
Get Book Here
Book Description
La culpa es de la vaca nos cuenta anécdotas, fábulas y parábolas que aportan reflexiones claras para estimular actitudes positivas sobre aspectos del diario vivir. Este libro será un compañero ideal para pensar sobre valores como la tolerancia, el respeto, el amor y la fe, a través de los relatos y narraciones cortas que contienen al final una enseñanza. Este es un libro ideal para leer en familia, compartir con amigos o para encontrar en la lectura individual una luz de esperanza en los momentos más complejos de la vida. _Jaime L.
Author: Jaime Lopera
Publisher: Intermedio Editores
ISBN: 9789587096439
Category : Parables
Languages : es
Pages : 72
Get Book Here
Book Description
Presents a collection of moral tales for children, with questions, games, and activities to reinforce the lessons of the stories.
Author: Liliana Mizrahi
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789500413657
Category : Guilt
Languages : es
Pages : 170
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Piedad Ruiz Castillo
Publisher:
ISBN: 9788413571331
Category :
Languages : es
Pages : 134
Get Book Here
Book Description
La culpa de la mujer está en el corazón del mito bíblico y en el corazón de la ley del Estado. La mujer está destinada a ser la encargada, en la organización del Estado, de preservar la reserva afectiva de las relaciones de poder. Esa gran disponibilidad para el amor se traduce en una mayor capacidad para amar, es una ventaja extraordinaria, el problema viene cuando implica necesariamente que la culpa, en su aspecto más persecutorio, tenga solo nombre de mujer y su cuerpo la encarne. ¿Podrán las mujeres amar sin esa culpa milenaria? ¿Podrán las mujeres gozar de su sexualidad sin que la culpa y la vergüenza dañen sus cuerpos? ¿Podrán las mujeres no confundir el afán de apego con el daño y el maltrato sufrido en nombre del amor? ¿Podrán los movimientos feministas incidir en esta emancipación pendiente? Este libro habla del sufrimiento psíquico de la mujer maltratada, de los componentes del maltrato y también de la clínica y del tratamiento que permita a un sujeto cambiar de posición a partir de su determinación sintomática. La importancia de este aspecto debería ser tenida en cuenta por todos aquellos dispositivos que se puedan crear para atender a estas mujeres. Piedad Ruiz Castillo es psicóloga clínica, psicoanalista.
Author: Saturnino Calleja y Fernandez
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Spanish language
Languages : en
Pages : 2004
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Patricia Walker O'Connor
Publisher: Editorial Fundamentos
ISBN: 9788424510763
Category : Literary Collections
Languages : en
Pages : 450
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Nathan Nobis
Publisher: Open Philosophy Press
ISBN: 0578532638
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 77
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book introduces readers to the many arguments and controversies concerning abortion. While it argues for ethical and legal positions on the issues, it focuses on how to think about the issues, not just what to think about them. It is an ideal resource to improve your understanding of what people think, why they think that and whether their (and your) arguments are good or bad, and why. It's ideal for classroom use, discussion groups, organizational learning, and personal reading. From the Preface To many people, abortion is an issue for which discussions and debates are frustrating and fruitless: it seems like no progress will ever be made towards any understanding, much less resolution or even compromise. Judgments like these, however, are premature because some basic techniques from critical thinking, such as carefully defining words and testing definitions, stating the full structure of arguments so each step of the reasoning can be examined, and comparing the strengths and weaknesses of different explanations can help us make progress towards these goals. When emotions run high, we sometimes need to step back and use a passion for calm, cool, critical thinking. This helps us better understand the positions and arguments of people who see things differently from us, as well as our own positions and arguments. And we can use critical thinking skills help to try to figure out which positions are best, in terms of being supported by good arguments: after all, we might have much to learn from other people, sometimes that our own views should change, for the better. Here we use basic critical thinking skills to argue that abortion is typically not morally wrong. We begin with less morally-controversial claims: adults, children and babies are wrong to kill and wrong to kill, fundamentally, because they, we, are conscious, aware and have feelings. We argue that since early fetuses entirely lack these characteristics, they are not inherently wrong to kill and so most abortions are not morally wrong, since most abortions are done early in pregnancy, before consciousness and feeling develop in the fetus. Furthermore, since the right to life is not the right to someone else’s body, fetuses might not have the right to the pregnant woman’s body—which she has the right to—and so she has the right to not allow the fetus use of her body. This further justifies abortion, at least until technology allows for the removal of fetuses to other wombs. Since morally permissible actions should be legal, abortions should be legal: it is an injustice to criminalize actions that are not wrong. In the course of arguing for these claims, we: 1. discuss how to best define abortion; 2. dismiss many common “question-begging” arguments that merely assume their conclusions, instead of giving genuine reasons for them; 3. refute some often-heard “everyday arguments” about abortion, on all sides; 4. explain why the most influential philosophical arguments against abortion are unsuccessful; 5. provide some positive arguments that at least early abortions are not wrong; 6. briefly discuss the ethics and legality of later abortions, and more. This essay is not a “how to win an argument” piece or a tract or any kind of apologetics. It is not designed to help anyone “win” debates: everybody “wins” on this issue when we calmly and respectfully engage arguments with care, charity, honesty and humility. This book is merely a reasoned, systematic introduction to the issues that we hope models these skills and virtues. Its discussion should not be taken as absolute “proof” of anything: much more needs to be understood and carefully discussed—always.
