Judicial Conflict and Consensus PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Judicial Conflict and Consensus PDF full book. Access full book title Judicial Conflict and Consensus by Sheldon Goldman. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Sheldon Goldman
Publisher: University Press of Kentucky
ISBN: 0813186226
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 390
Get Book Here
Book Description
These original essays by major scholars of judicial behavior explore the frequency, intensity, and especially the causes of conflict and consensus among judges on American appellate courts. Together, these studies provide new insights into judges' attitudes and values, role perceptions, and small group interactions.
Author: Sheldon Goldman
Publisher: University Press of Kentucky
ISBN: 0813186226
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 390
Get Book Here
Book Description
These original essays by major scholars of judicial behavior explore the frequency, intensity, and especially the causes of conflict and consensus among judges on American appellate courts. Together, these studies provide new insights into judges' attitudes and values, role perceptions, and small group interactions.
Author: Alison Burke
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781636350684
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jamal Greene
Publisher: Houghton Mifflin
ISBN: 1328518116
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 341
Get Book Here
Book Description
An eminent constitutional scholar reveals how our approach to rights is dividing America, and shows how we can build a better system of justice.
Author: Lee C. Bollinger
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 019505430X
Category : Freedom of expression
Languages : en
Pages : 306
Get Book Here
Book Description
In The Tolerant Society, Bollinger offers a masterful critique of the major theories of freedom of expression, and offers an alternative explanation. Traditional justifications for protecting extremist speech have turned largely on the inherent value of self-expression, maintaining that the benefits of the free interchange of ideas include the greater likelihood of serving truth and of promoting wise decisions in a democracy. Bollinger finds these theories persuasive but inadequate. Buttrressing his argument with references to the Skokie case and many other examples, as well as a careful analysis of the primary literature on free speech, he contends that the real value of toleration of extremist speech lies in the extraordinary self-control toward antisocial behavior that it elicits: society is stengthened by the exercise of tolerance, he maintains. The problem of finding an appropriate response -- especially when emotions make measured response difficult -- is common to all social interaction, Bollinger points out, and there are useful lesons to be learned from withholding punishment even for what is conceded to be bad behavior.
Author: Emmett Macfarlane
Publisher: UBC Press
ISBN: 077482350X
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 266
Get Book Here
Book Description
In Governing from the Bench, Emmett Macfarlane draws on interviews with current and former justices, law clerks, and other staff members of the court to shed light on the institution’s internal environment and decision-making processes. He explores the complex role of the Supreme Court as an institution; exposes the rules, conventions, and norms that shape and constrain its justices’ behavior; and situates the court in its broader governmental and societal context, as it relates to the elected branches of government, the media, and the public.
Author: Philip Russell Goodman
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199976066
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 241
Get Book Here
Book Description
In Breaking the Pendulum, Philip Goodman, Joshua Page, and Michelle Phelps debunk the pendulum model of American criminal justice, arguing that it distorts how and why punishment changes. From the birth of the penitentiary through recent reforms, the authors show how the struggle of players in the penal field shapes punishment.
Author: Richard A. Posner
Publisher: Harvard University Press
ISBN: 9780674042230
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 338
Get Book Here
Book Description
Ambitious legal thinkers have become mesmerized by moral philosophy, believing that great figures in the philosophical tradition hold the keys to understanding and improving law and justice and even to resolving the most contentious issues of constitutional law. They are wrong, contends Richard Posner in this book. Posner characterizes the current preoccupation with moral and constitutional theory as the latest form of legal mystification--an evasion of the real need of American law, which is for a greater understanding of the social, economic, and political facts out of which great legal controversies arise. In pursuit of that understanding, Posner advocates a rebuilding of the law on the pragmatic basis of open-minded and systematic empirical inquiry and the rejection of cant and nostalgia--the true professionalism foreseen by Oliver Wendell Holmes a century ago. A bracing book that pulls no punches and leaves no pieties unpunctured or sacred cows unkicked, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory offers a sweeping tour of the current scene in legal studies--and a hopeful prospect for its future.
Author: Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107041031
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 255
Get Book Here
Book Description
The most comprehensive and critical analysis of the application of European consensus by the European Court of Human Rights.
Author: Friedrich K. Juenger
Publisher: Brill Nijhoff
ISBN: 9781571053305
Category : Conflict of laws
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Contains "the original text with a set of comments by experts in the field."
Author: Virginia A. Hettinger
Publisher: University of Virginia Press
ISBN: 9780813926971
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 172
Get Book Here
Book Description
Focusing on the behavioral aspects of disagreement within a panel and between the levels of the federal judicial hierarchy, the authors reveal the impact of individual attitudes or preferences on judicial decision-making, and hence on political divisions in the broader society.
