Investing in Arizona's Future

Investing in Arizona's Future PDF Author: Washington (D.C.) Institute for Higher Education Policy
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education, Higher
Languages : en
Pages : 40

Get Book Here

Book Description

Investing in Arizona's Future

Investing in Arizona's Future PDF Author: Washington (D.C.) Institute for Higher Education Policy
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education, Higher
Languages : en
Pages : 40

Get Book Here

Book Description


Investing in Arizona's Future. College Access, Affordability, and the Impact of Investment in Need-Based Financial Aid

Investing in Arizona's Future. College Access, Affordability, and the Impact of Investment in Need-Based Financial Aid PDF Author: Ronald A. Phipps
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 40

Get Book Here

Book Description
Today, a college degree is an ever-increasing milestone on the road to personal success. Although the gains of education that accrue to the individual are more obvious, society also has much to gain from an educated populous. These dual benefits provide the rationale to spend taxpayer dollars to help capable but economically disadvantaged students attain college degrees. Yet, in response to shifting attitudes about the relative importance of individual and societal benefits, the size of the public contribution in the U.S. has diminished during the past several years. This report strives to provide information to help maintain a balance between individuals' and society's contribution to the cost of college. This report also catalogues a variety of public and private benefits, both social and economic, derived from educational attainment of the citizens of the state of Arizona. College matters, both to the individual members of the workforce of the state of Arizona and to their fellow Arizona citizens who reap the rich rewards of their efforts.

College Affordability and the Emergence of Progressive Tuition Models

College Affordability and the Emergence of Progressive Tuition Models PDF Author: Patrick A. Lapid
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 21

Get Book Here

Book Description
In an era of significant disinvestment in public higher education by state governments, many public universities are moving toward a "progressive tuition model" that attempts to invest approximately one-third of tuition income into institutional financial aid for lower-income and middle-class students. The objective is to mitigate the cost of tuition and keep college affordable. But is this model as currently formulated working? What levels of financial stress are students of all income groups experiencing? And are they changing their behaviors? Utilizing data from the Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) Survey of undergraduates and other data sources, this study explores these issues by focusing on students at the University of California and ten AAU institutions that are members of the SERU Consortium. At least to date, the increase in tuition, and costs related to housing and other living expenses, have not had a negative impact on the number of lower-income students attending UC. Reflecting to some degree UC's robust financial aid policies, and perhaps the growing number of lower-income families in California, there has been an actual increase in their number and as a percentage of total enrollment--a counterintuitive finding to the general perception that higher tuition equals less access to the economically vulnerable. At the same time, there is evidence of a "middle-class" squeeze, with a marginal drop in the number of students from this economic class. Students' concerns for paying for higher education and accumulated student debt in the 2014 SERU are predictably higher among lower-income students, yet upper-middle income students (with annual family incomes from $80-125,000) are the least likely to agree that the cost of attendance is manageable. With these and other nuances and caveats briefly discussed in this study, the "progressive tuition model" appears to be working in terms of affordability and with only moderate indicators of increased financial stress and changed student behaviors. These results are not necessarily predictive of the future if tuition rates go up further. But they do indicate the higher tuition rates at highly selective public universities, if accompanied by robust federal, state and institutional financial aid, may be the best path for maintaining access to lower-income students, and for generating income needed for institutions to maintain or improve student-to-faculty ratios and other markers of quality. Freezing tuition, as currently demanded by state lawmakers in California, does not appear to be based on any clear analysis of the correlation of tuition and affordability. It appears more as a politically attractive way to appeal to voters while ignoring the financial consequences for public colleges and universities and the quality of the student experience. The following are appended: (1) SERU Data Tables; (2) SERU responses by ethnicity among UC students; (3) SERU tabulations of responses; and (4) SERU Consortium Member Campuses.

College Affordability for Low-Income Adults

College Affordability for Low-Income Adults PDF Author: Barbara Gault
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 48

Get Book Here

Book Description
This report examines how efforts to understand and improve college affordability can be informed by the experiences and circumstances of low-income adults, students of color, and students with dependent children. The report discusses how the time and financial demands associated with financial independence, parenthood, and work affect a student's ability to invest in college, and how segregation in college majors diminishes returns on investment for low-income students. The following recommendations for improving affordability and returns on investment are included in this report: (1) Create systems and tools to help women and students of color select majors that prepare them for high-paying careers; (2) Shift federal and state systems of financial aid to more accurately and completely account for student financial need--to help apportion more aid to students who need it the most; (3) Develop more student and campus supports that acknowledge the multiple demands in students' lives, which often include substantial work and care-giving obligations; (4) Expand efforts to help students access publicly provided benefits, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), TANF, WIC, and child care subsidies; and (5) Develop more targeted scholarships and campus supports for the many students with dependent care obligations, such as inclusive campus policies, programs to increase social connectedness and reduce isolation, health supports, and single-parent housing, in addition to child care support. Ideally, any interventions to shift institutional and consumer knowledge and incentives should be examined from the perspectives of how they will affect women and communities of color, populations that have disproportionate time constraints, dependent care obligations, and poorer labor market outcomes at all educational levels.

The Case against Education

The Case against Education PDF Author: Bryan Caplan
Publisher: Princeton University Press
ISBN: 0691201439
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 551

Get Book Here

Book Description
Why we need to stop wasting public funds on education Despite being immensely popular—and immensely lucrative—education is grossly overrated. Now with a new afterword by Bryan Caplan, this explosive book argues that the primary function of education is not to enhance students' skills but to signal the qualities of a good employee. Learn why students hunt for easy As only to forget most of what they learn after the final exam, why decades of growing access to education have not resulted in better jobs for average workers, how employers reward workers for costly schooling they rarely ever use, and why cutting education spending is the best remedy. Romantic notions about education being "good for the soul" must yield to careful research and common sense—The Case against Education points the way.

Investing in Arizona's Future

Investing in Arizona's Future PDF Author: Arizona State University. Office of the President
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Research
Languages : en
Pages : 65

Get Book Here

Book Description


Increasing College Enrollment Among Low and Moderate Income Families

Increasing College Enrollment Among Low and Moderate Income Families PDF Author: Eric Bettinger
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : College attendance
Languages : en
Pages : 20

Get Book Here

Book Description


Public Policy and College Access

Public Policy and College Access PDF Author: Edward P. St. John
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education and state
Languages : en
Pages : 232

Get Book Here

Book Description
Volume 19 of Readings on Equal Education takes a hard look at the impact of state and federal policies on college access. Since passage of the Higher Education Act of 1965, differences in access for low-income and middle-income families have been an important issue. This volume suggests a new approach to policy research on college access and provides information on the impact of federal and state financial and school reform policies. Statistics (NCES) studies and expose the serious errors made in these studies. These chapters show how the errors were made, consider the implications for federal higher education policy, demonstrate the critical need for a reanalysis of the NCES databases, and reanalyze the access challenge using NCES databases. Section II examines changes in the state role in promoting access to higher education. Articles focus on the impact of change in state policies on state student grant programs, academic preparation, and postsecondary encouragement.

Financial Aid

Financial Aid PDF Author: Education Resources Institute, Pathways to College Network
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 2

Get Book Here

Book Description
A key objective of the Pathways to College Network is to disseminate effective, research-based practices and policies that address access and managing college costs. As part of its effort to inform parents, families, students, and policymakers, it has compiled here a few of the key principles and strategies that underlay a well-focused financial aid approach. The chart in this paper reflects these principles and strategies along with indicators of federal, state, and institutional responsibility. Key findings include: (1) The fundamental purpose of student financial aid at all levels is to assist financially needy students and assure that they have access to and choice among higher education institutions without regard to ability to pay; (2) Financial aid is an integral component of an overall P-16 strategy to facilitate college access and success; (3) A well-grounded state financial assistance program is student-oriented, integrated with state tuition and financing policies as well as with federal and private aid programs, accountable and appropriate for the goals it serves, transparent and predictable, and reinforces students' readiness for college; (4) Federal, state, institutional, and private partners must invest more equitably and efficiently in college success skills for students from all backgrounds; (5) Expanding access to and opportunity for a successful postsecondary experience for all students who are prepared and desire to attend is essential to the nation's social progress and economic prosperity; and (6) Accountability for outcomes of investments in pre-college and college support programs, as well as financial aid, should focus on measuring the degree to which student access, persistence, and success are increased. (Contains 10 sources.).

States in the Driver's Seat

States in the Driver's Seat PDF Author: Brian T. Prescott
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
With increasingly widespread calls to raise educational attainment levels without substantially growing public investment in higher education, policymakers and others have devoted growing attention to the role of financial aid programs in providing access to, promoting affordability for, and incentivizing success in college. Given relative levels of investment, most of that focus has been on federal financial aid programs. But for students enrolled in higher education, the vast majority of whom attend public institutions, the impact of federal aid policies is filtered through finance policies enacted at the state level. The wide differences in financing strategies among states mean that states ultimately determine to a great extent how college opportunities are distributed, costs are affordable, and students are successful. This concept paper takes a closer look at state financial aid programs and how they are uniquely well-positioned to address many of the financial challenges in college access, success, and affordability that stand in the way of achieving educational attainment goals. It advances a framework for the distribution of aid that is efficient with scarce public funds, encourages students to make progress and succeed, promotes institutional behaviors that are aligned with public needs and expectations, and integrates state policies with federal and institutional policies and practices. Informed by a set of guiding principles, the paper makes the following policy proposals: (1) States can adopt a Shared Responsibility Model (SRM) as the framework for determining the eligibility for a state grant, as well as the amount of the grant; (2) States can encourage well-designed, state-supported programs to assist students in meeting their student contribution; (3) States can embed demand-side incentives that promote student success; (4) States can embed supply-side incentives that ensure that institutions share in both the risk and rewards of student success; (5) States can leverage grant aid programs to encourage institutional aid expenditures that are aligned with state goals for student success, affordability, transparency, and predictability; (6) The federal government can recommit to its historic partnership with states in promoting well designed grant programs through a contemporary LEAP program; (7) States can ensure that their grant programs include an expectation that standards of academic quality are maintained; and (8) States can require that their financial aid programs are systematically evaluated.