Author: Thomas Joseph Weber
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental adhesives
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
In Vitro Tensile Bond Strength Comparison of Two Ceramic Brackets Utilizing Three Adhesive Filler Concentrations
Author: Thomas Joseph Weber
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental adhesives
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental adhesives
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
In Vitro Shear, Torsional, and Tensile Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Utilizing Three Adhesive Filler Concentrations
Author: Alan James Ostertag
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental adhesives
Languages : en
Pages : 134
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental adhesives
Languages : en
Pages : 134
Book Description
In-vitro Tensile Bond Strength Comparison of Metal and Ceramic Brackets Using Autopolymerizing and Light-cured Resins
Author: Paul Raymond Ostertag
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental bonding
Languages : en
Pages : 132
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental bonding
Languages : en
Pages : 132
Book Description
An in Vitro Study of Shear and Tensile Bond Strengths Comparing Mechanically and Chemically Bonded Ceramic Brackets with Three Bonding Agents
Author: Kristian Eric Hyer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental bonding
Languages : en
Pages : 230
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental bonding
Languages : en
Pages : 230
Book Description
Cumulated Index Medicus
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medicine
Languages : en
Pages : 1484
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medicine
Languages : en
Pages : 1484
Book Description
A Comparative Study of Shear Bond Strengths of Different Combinations of Adhesive Systems and a Porcelain Priming Agent when Bonding Ceramic Brackets to Porcelain
Author: Boyd O. Whitlock
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 120
Book Description
The purpose of this study was to compare the bond strengths of three adhesive systems (two-paste, no-mix, and one light-activated) when used alone and combined with a porcelain priming agent to bond ceramic brackets to porcelain surfaces. Sixty porcelain specimens were randomly assigned to the six different treatment groups. One half of the groups were bonded with the porcelain priming agent and one of the adhesive systems and the other half with one of the adhesive systems without the priming agent. The shear bond strengths, expressed in megapascals (MPa), of all specimens were tested, using an Instron testing machine, 10 minutes after being bonded. The surface of the porcelain and the bracket base were examined, using the scanning electron microscope (SEM), to determine the bond failure patterns and check the prcelain surface for the presence of cracks and fractures. Across the three different adhesive systems, mean shear bond strength measurements ranged from 6.3-7.5 MPa when the porcelain primer was used and from 1.8-3.8 when the porcelain primer was not used. There was a statistically significant difference within each adhesive between those samples with the priming agent (mean shear bond strength of 6.5 ± 0.8, 7.5 ± 1.0, and 6.3 ± 1.2) and those without the priming agent (mean shear bond strength of 3.8 ± 0.4, 1.8 ± 1.8, nad 2.6 ± 1.3) (p ≤ 0.5). Differences between the three adhesives were not statistically significant (p ≤ .05). Evaluation of the bond failure sites, using the SEM, revealed failures at the porcelain-adhesive interface, within the adhesive and at the bracket-adhseive interface for the porcelain primer samples. The samples that were bonded with the different adhesives only displayed a failure exclusively at the porcelain-adhesive interface. The failure patterns were verified by qualitative energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDS). It can be concluded from this study that using any of the three adhesive systems combined with the porcelain priming agent will provide sufficient bond strength to withstand normal orthodontic forces and not damage the surface of the porcelain when debonded.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 120
Book Description
The purpose of this study was to compare the bond strengths of three adhesive systems (two-paste, no-mix, and one light-activated) when used alone and combined with a porcelain priming agent to bond ceramic brackets to porcelain surfaces. Sixty porcelain specimens were randomly assigned to the six different treatment groups. One half of the groups were bonded with the porcelain priming agent and one of the adhesive systems and the other half with one of the adhesive systems without the priming agent. The shear bond strengths, expressed in megapascals (MPa), of all specimens were tested, using an Instron testing machine, 10 minutes after being bonded. The surface of the porcelain and the bracket base were examined, using the scanning electron microscope (SEM), to determine the bond failure patterns and check the prcelain surface for the presence of cracks and fractures. Across the three different adhesive systems, mean shear bond strength measurements ranged from 6.3-7.5 MPa when the porcelain primer was used and from 1.8-3.8 when the porcelain primer was not used. There was a statistically significant difference within each adhesive between those samples with the priming agent (mean shear bond strength of 6.5 ± 0.8, 7.5 ± 1.0, and 6.3 ± 1.2) and those without the priming agent (mean shear bond strength of 3.8 ± 0.4, 1.8 ± 1.8, nad 2.6 ± 1.3) (p ≤ 0.5). Differences between the three adhesives were not statistically significant (p ≤ .05). Evaluation of the bond failure sites, using the SEM, revealed failures at the porcelain-adhesive interface, within the adhesive and at the bracket-adhseive interface for the porcelain primer samples. The samples that were bonded with the different adhesives only displayed a failure exclusively at the porcelain-adhesive interface. The failure patterns were verified by qualitative energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDS). It can be concluded from this study that using any of the three adhesive systems combined with the porcelain priming agent will provide sufficient bond strength to withstand normal orthodontic forces and not damage the surface of the porcelain when debonded.
In Vitro Bond Strength of Orthodontic Direct Bonding Bracket-cement Systems
Author: V. A. James Buzzitta
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental bonding
Languages : en
Pages : 150
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental bonding
Languages : en
Pages : 150
Book Description
In Vitro Bond Strength of Plastic Bracket-cement Systems
Author: Lucila Guerrero de Pulido
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental bonding
Languages : en
Pages : 128
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental bonding
Languages : en
Pages : 128
Book Description
In Vitro Comparison of Tensile Bond Strengths for Orthodontic Adhesives Following Enamel Etching at Various Times and Phosphoric Acid Concentrations
Author: Donald P. Wolfert
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental adhesives
Languages : en
Pages : 126
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dental adhesives
Languages : en
Pages : 126
Book Description
An in Vitro Comparative Study of Shear and Tensile Bond Strengths for Stainless Steel and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets
Author: Kirk Tristan Ripley
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Orthodontic appliances
Languages : en
Pages : 218
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Orthodontic appliances
Languages : en
Pages : 218
Book Description