Official Illinois Appellate Court Reports PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Official Illinois Appellate Court Reports PDF full book. Access full book title Official Illinois Appellate Court Reports by Illinois. Appellate Court. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Illinois. Appellate Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 774
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Illinois. Appellate Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 1206
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Illinois. Appellate Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 774
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Illinois. Appellate Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 700
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Illinois. Appellate Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 992
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Illinois Appellate Court
Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com
ISBN: 9781230036342
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 240
Get Book Here
Book Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 edition. Excerpt: ... Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the HON. CI.-AB!NCI N. Goonwm, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912. Dismissed. Opinion filed J une 3, 1913. MoEwEN, WEISSENBACH, SHBIMSKI & MELOAN, for appellants. FRANK J onusron, Ja., and J orm W. BECKWTTH, for appellees; WILLIAM H. SEx'roN and PHILIP J. McKENNA, of counsel. Mn. J USTICE F. A. SMITH delivered the opinion of the court. This appeal if from a judgment of the Superior Court of Cook county sustaining demurrers to three several petitions for mandamus, dismissing the petitions and awarding costs against petitioners. The petitions set forth that July 14, 1910, the petitioners, appellants, were, by the then mayor of Chicago, appointed members of the Board of Local Improvements of the city of Chicago for a term of two years; that following such appointment, appellants made and executed their bonds as provided by the ordinances of the city of Chicago, and the same were approved by the City Council and appellants became and were duly elected, qualified and acting members of the Board of Local Improvements of the said city; that afterwards and upon the first day of May, 1911, the Honorable Carter H. Harrison, then mayor of the city of Chicago, by communication addressed to the City Council, made a pretended removal of appellants without charges of any kind and for no reason whatever except political reasons, and appointed a successor for each of the appellants respectively, which removal and appointment was, upon the same day, concurred in by the City Council; that afterwards, each of appellants presented a communication to the City Council of the city of Chicago, setting forth that pursuant to his appointment to the ofiice of member of the...
Author: Illinois. Appellate Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Courts
Languages : en
Pages : 728
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Illinois Appellate Court
Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com
ISBN: 9781230008820
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 232
Get Book Here
Book Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 edition. Excerpt: ...opinion of the court. This case was brought in the court below to recover damages for injuries received by appellee on October 30, 1909, while working as an employee of appellants, at, their coal mine in Minonk. The case was tried on two amended counts and one additional count of the declaration. The first amended count of the declaration charges that appellants were possessed of and conducting a coal mine, and were possessed of various buildings, run-ways, tracks and cars used in connection with the mine, and located at, around or near the opening of the mine; and were possessed of a certain track or run-way, made of rails and ties, and other material, upon which track, in the course of their business they operated a certain vehicle known as a "jumbo car," used for the purpose of conveying from a point near the shaft of the mine, upon an inclined plane, certain waste material from the mine, for the purpose of dumping and depositing the same in a pile of waste material, which jumbo car was when in motion controlled and handled by means of a cable attached to machinery driven by steam power; a.nd that appellants possessed a certain contrivance called a "stall" located at the lower end of said track, in which stall the jumbo car was loaded with waste ma terials from time to time; that on the thirtieth day of October, 1909, said stall and a certain post of said stall were out of repair, and that then, and for several months prior thereto, appellee was in the employ of appellants as a blacksmith, wood-worker and repairer; and that on said last mentioned day, appellants ordered appellee to repair said stall and post, and that in obedience to such order, appellee went upon the track, with necessary tools to make such...
Author: Illinois Appellate Court
Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com
ISBN: 9781230101224
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 228
Get Book Here
Book Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1914 edition. Excerpt: ...stock may receive a semi-annual dividend on the stock so held by them, not to exceed three and one-half per cent. of the same; such dividends to be paid at the times and in the manner designated by the Directors of said Company. The earnings and receipts of said Company over and above the dividends, losses and expenses shall be accumrula ted. ' ' Article-VI with the exception of its last clause, not pertinent hereto is: "The insurance business of the Company shall be conducted upon the mutual plan. All premiums shall be payable in cash. In case any policy holder shall omit to pay any premium due from him to the Company, or violate any other condition of the policy of insurance, the Board of Directors may forfeit his policy and apply all previous payments to the benefit of the Company.. The officers of the Company, within sixty days from the expiration of the first five years from Dec. 31, 1859, and within the first sixty days of every subsequent period of five years, shall cause a balance to be struck of the affairs of the Company, which shall exhibit its assets and liabilities both present and contingent, and also the net surplus after deducting a suflicient amount to cover all outstanding risks and other obligations. Each policy holder shall be credited with an equitable share of the said surplus. Such equitable share after being ascertained shall be applied to the purchase of an additional amount of insurance (payable at death or with the policy itself) expressing the reversionary value of such equitable share at such interest as the Directors may designate, or if any policy holder shall so direct, such equitable share of surplus shall be ap Townsend v. Equitable L. A. S., 183 Ill. App. 326. plied to the purchase of...
Author: Illinois Appellate Court
Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com
ISBN: 9781230091556
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 228
Get Book Here
Book Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1917 edition. Excerpt: ...,1. APPEAL AND nnaon, 1399--'when master's findings of fact will not be disturbed on appeal. In an equity suit where the testimony is conflicting and contradictory, requiring the master to pass on the credibility of witnesses, his finding of facts will not be reversed unless clearly and palpably contrary to the weight of the evidence. 2. MonTcAeEs, 503--when evidence justifies dismissal of bill to foreclose. On a bill to foreclose a mortgage by assignees of notes 'See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number. Vol. CCII 27 a Steward et al. v. Weisenmayer, 202 Ill. App. 338. secured thereby, who elected to foreclose in accordance with the terms of the mortgage on nonpayment of interest due on one of the notes, such notes having been assigned to the complainants by the deceased mortgagee in her lifetime, an intervening petition having been filed by the husband of the mortgagee, claiming to be the legal owner of the notes, where the evidence satisfactorily showed that the money loaned on'the mortgage was that of the intervening petitioner, a decree dismissing the bill for want of equity, canceling the assignments and transfer of the notes to the complainant, declaring the intervening petitioner the legal and equitable owner of the notes and ordering the complainant to transfer them to him, held proper. 3. APPEAL AND ERROR, 1488----when admission of improper evidence by master not ground for reversal. In an equity suit, held that the defendant's objection that improper evidence was heard by the master need not be considered where the defendant's objection to such evidence was sustained by the master and he reported that he had not considered it in reaching...
Author: Illinois Appellate Court
Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com
ISBN: 9781230040301
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 228
Get Book Here
Book Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 edition. Excerpt: ...worth to the full amount of a stock subscription. If they see fit to accept property in lieu of cash, they can only take it at its fair cash market value, or, if it has no ascertainable market value, only at such a price as might be realized by selling the property to others for cash. They should ascertain the value of such property precisely in the same manner as they would do if they were about to invest their own money therein. The rule, that a mistake by directors in accepting property at too high a valuation in payment of a stock subscription cannot be regarded as a fraudulent over-valuation, applies only where the transaction constitutes a valid contract of bargain and sale, made in good faith by the directors, and in the intelligent exercise of fair and honest judgment on their part, and does not apply to a sham transaction. Gillett v. Chicago T. & T. Co., 230 Ill. 373; see, also, Sprague v. National Bank of America, 172 Ill. 149; Thayer v. El Plomo Mining Co., 40 Ill. App. 344, where mining property of little value was taken in full payment of the stock; Moore v. U. S. Barrel Co., 238 Ill. 544, where a patent of uncertain value was taken in payment for the stock. And a stockholder's liability is not affected by the bankruptcy of the corporation. Tibballs v. Libby, 87 Ill. 142. Counsel for Cudahy also makes the point that there was no allegation of fraud, in terms, in the bill, and no allegation that either Cudahy or Hazelhurst or the other directors, knowingly or intentionally 0ver-estimated the value of the patent. While it is true there was no direct charge of fraud in the bill, it was alleged that there was $100,000 of the stock subscription of Cudahy, and a like sum of the stock subscription of Hazelhurst, due and...
