George Bryan and the Constitution of Pennsylvania, 1731-1791 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download George Bryan and the Constitution of Pennsylvania, 1731-1791 PDF full book. Access full book title George Bryan and the Constitution of Pennsylvania, 1731-1791 by Burton Alva Konkle. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Burton Alva Konkle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Biography & Autobiography
Languages : en
Pages : 542
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Burton Alva Konkle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Biography & Autobiography
Languages : en
Pages : 542
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Burton Alva Konkle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Biography & Autobiography
Languages : en
Pages : 496
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Konkle Burton Alva
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780259636120
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Samuel Bryan
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781892355010
Category : Constitutional history
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Charles Warren
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional history
Languages : en
Pages : 856
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Henry Campbell Black
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 574
Get Book Here
Book Description
Includes section "Book reviews".
Author: William P. Kreml
Publisher: Univ of South Carolina Press
ISBN: 9781570031113
Category : Civil law
Languages : en
Pages : 252
Get Book Here
Book Description
Annotation. William P. Kreml contends that the sectoral divide - the division between the public and private sectors and not the divisions among America's political institutions are traditionally understood - makes up the historically and ideologically most significant separation within American law. He offers an original reinterpretation of American Constitutional development, tracing the evolution of the private and public sectors through the Magna Carta, Edward I, Coke, Blackstone, and others and assessing the impact of the English sectoral divide on the U.S. Constitution. Kreml writes that the evolution of the ideological argument between English common law and English state law had a direct impact on the development of the private and public jurisdictions within the pre-Constitutional American states as well as on the Constitutional argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The same sectoral differentiation, Kreml maintains, underpinned the highly distinctive ideological perspectives ofthe Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Kreml then traces the sectoral divide through U.S. legal history, arguing, for example, that Roe v. Wade was not a privacy case as is commonly believed and that the open housing case of Shelley v. Kraemer was not a public-sector-enhancing case but rather a victory for private common law principles. Kreml employs a sectoral analysis to what he believes to be the Burger Court's incorrect decision in the campaign finance case of Buckley v. Valeo, and he offers an original reinterpretation of the judicial activism of the Warren Court and the differentiation between early Constitutional and Warren-era forms of political majoritarianism.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 540
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Darren Patrick Guerra
Publisher: Lexington Books
ISBN: 0739183869
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 253
Get Book Here
Book Description
He who can change the Constitution controls the Constitution. So who does control the Constitution? The answer has always been: “the people.” The people control the Constitution via the Article V amending process outlined in the Constitution itself. Changes can only be made through Article V and its formal procedures. Article V has always provided a means of perfecting the Constitution in an explicit, democratically authentic, prudent, and deliberative manner. In addition to changing the Constitution Article V also allowed the people to perfect and preserve their Constitution at the same time. In recent years Article V has come under attack by influential legal scholars who criticize it for being too difficult, undemocratic, and too formal. Such scholars advocate for ignoring Article V in favor of elite adaptation of the Constitution or popular amendment through national referendums. In making their case, critics also assume that Article V is an unimportant and expendable part of the Constitutional structure. One notable scholar called the Constitution “imbecilic” because of Article V. This book shows that, to the contrary, Article V is a unique and powerful extension of the American tradition of written constitutionalism. It was a logical extension of American constitutional development and it was a powerful tool used by the Federalists to argue for ratification of the new Constitution. Since then it has served as a means of “perfecting” the US Constitution for over 200 years via a wide range of amendments. Contrary to contemporary critics, the historical evidence shows Article V to be a vital element in the Constitutional architecture, not an expendable or ancillary piece. This book defends Article V against critics by showing that it is neither too difficult, undemocratic, nor too formal. Furthermore, a positive case is made that Article V remains the most clear and powerful way to register the sovereign desires of the American public with regard to alterations of their fundamental law. In the end, Article V is an essential bulwark to maintaining a written Constitution that secures the rights of the people against both elites and themselves.
Author: Michael J. Faber
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
ISBN: 0700634177
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 504
Get Book Here
Book Description
What would an Anti-Federalist Constitution look like? Because we view the Constitution through the lens of the Federalists who came to control the narrative, we tend to forget those who opposed its ratification. And yet the Anti-Federalist arguments, so critical to an understanding of the Constitution’s origins and meaning, resonate throughout American history. By reconstructing these arguments and tracing their development through the ratification debates, Michael J. Faber presents an alternative perspective on constitutional history. Telling, in a sense, the other side of the story of the Constitution, his book offers key insights into the ideas that helped to form the nation’s founding document and that continue to inform American politics and public life. Faber identifies three distinct strands of political thought that eventually came together in a clear and coherent Anti-Federalism position: (1) the individual and the potential for governmental tyranny; (2) power, specifically the states as defenders of the people; and (3) democratic principles and popular sovereignty. After clarifying and elaborating these separate strands of thought and analyzing a well-known proponent of each, Faber goes on to tell the story of the resistance to the Constitution, focusing on ideas but also following and explaining events and strategies. Finally, he produces a “counterfactual” Anti-Federalist Constitution, summing up the Anti-Federalist position as it might have emerged had the opposition drafted the document. How would such a constitution have worked in practice? A close consideration reveals the legacy of the Anti-Federalists in early American history, in the US Constitution and its role in the nation’s political life.
