Fort Belvoir, Implementation of 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Recommendations and Related Army Actions PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Fort Belvoir, Implementation of 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Recommendations and Related Army Actions PDF full book. Access full book title Fort Belvoir, Implementation of 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Recommendations and Related Army Actions by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 524
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 524
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. Mobile District
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fort Belvoir (Va.)
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428933611
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 37
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. Mobile District
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fort Belvoir (Va.)
Languages : en
Pages : 98
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Readiness Subcommittee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 232
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. Mobile District
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fort Belvoir (Va.)
Languages : en
Pages : 98
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 9781422397985
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 10
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Brian J. Lepore
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 143791330X
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 54
Get Book Here
Book Description
The 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round is the biggest, most complex, and costliest BRAC round ever. In addition to base closures, many recommendations involve realignments, such as returning forces to the U.S. from bases overseas and creating joint bases. However, anticipated savings remained an important consideration in justifying the need for the 2005 BRAC round. This report assessed: (1) challenges that might affect timely completion of recommendations; (2) any changes in DoD's reported cost and savings estimates since FY 2008; and (3) the potential for estimates to continue to change. Includes recommendations. Charts and tables.
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428931597
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 273
Get Book Here
Book Description
On May 13, 2005, the Secretary of Defense submitted proposed base realignment and closure (BRAC) actions to an independent commission for its review. The Commission must submit its recommendations to the President by September 8, 2005, for his acceptance or rejection in their entirety. Congress has final action to accept or reject these recommendations in their entirety later this year. The law required that GAO issue a report on the Department of Defense's (DoD) recommendations and selection process by July 1, 2005. GAO's objectives for this report were as follows: (1) determine the extent to which DoD's proposals achieved its stated BRAC goals, (2) analyze whether the process for developing recommendations was logical, and (3) identify issues with the recommendations that may warrant further attention. Time constraints limited GAO's ability to examine implementation details of most of the individual recommended actions. DoD had varying success in achieving its 2005 BRAC goals of reducing excess infrastructure and producing savings, furthering transformation, and fostering jointness. While DoD proposed a record number of closures and realignments, exceeding all prior BRAC rounds combined, many proposals focused on reserve bases and relatively few on closing active bases. Projected savings are almost equally large, but most savings are derived from 10 percent of the recommendations. While GAO believes savings would be achieved, overall up-front investment costs of an estimated $24 billion are required, and there are clear limitations associated with DoD's projection of nearly $50 billion in savings over a 20-year period. Much of the projected net annual recurring savings (47 percent) is associated with eliminating jobs currently held by military personnel. However, rather than reducing end-strength levels, DoD indicates the positions are expected to be reassigned to other areas, which may enhance capabilities but also limit dollar savings available for other use7.
