Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Impact for the FY 02 MCA PN 055223. Ship Operations Facility (USA/USAR) Pearl Harbor, Naval Station, Hawaii

Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Impact for the FY 02 MCA PN 055223. Ship Operations Facility (USA/USAR) Pearl Harbor, Naval Station, Hawaii PDF Author: United States. Army, Hawaii
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description

Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Impact for the FY 02 MCA PN 055223. Ship Operations Facility (USA/USAR) Pearl Harbor, Naval Station, Hawaii

Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Impact for the FY 02 MCA PN 055223. Ship Operations Facility (USA/USAR) Pearl Harbor, Naval Station, Hawaii PDF Author: United States. Army, Hawaii
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for the FY 02 MCA PN 055223. Ship Operations Facility (USA/USAR) Pearl Harbor, Naval Station, Hawaii

Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for the FY 02 MCA PN 055223. Ship Operations Facility (USA/USAR) Pearl Harbor, Naval Station, Hawaii PDF Author: United States. Army, Hawaii
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Building 695 Demolition. Pearl Harbor Naval Complex, Oahu, Hawaii

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Building 695 Demolition. Pearl Harbor Naval Complex, Oahu, Hawaii PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 36

Get Book Here

Book Description
The Department of the Navy has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508), and the Chief of Naval Operations Instruction (OPNAVINST) 5090.1 B. The purpose of this EA is to assess the potential environmental impacts of the Navy's proposed action of demolishing Building 695 at the Pearl Harbor Naval Complex. Building 695 is located outside the boundaries of the U.S. Naval Base Pearl Harbor National Historic Landmark (PHNHL), and is not located within a historic management zone designated by the Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP). Designated as a Category Ill facility, Building 695 is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Commander Navy Region Hawaii (CNRH) has determined that the building is excess to its mission requirements.

Pearl Harbor Naval Base Proposed Developments, Oahu

Pearl Harbor Naval Base Proposed Developments, Oahu PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 820

Get Book Here

Book Description


Tableaux, mobilier, céramique, miniatures et autres curiosités

Tableaux, mobilier, céramique, miniatures et autres curiosités PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


Final Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Developments at Naval Base Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii

Final Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Developments at Naval Base Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii PDF Author: Belt, Collins and Associates
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


Environmental Assessment for Building 88 Interior Demolition, Pearl Harbor Naval Complex, O'ahu, Hawaii

Environmental Assessment for Building 88 Interior Demolition, Pearl Harbor Naval Complex, O'ahu, Hawaii PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 47

Get Book Here

Book Description
Commander, Navy Region Hawaii (CNRH) proposes to demolish 56, 25,000-gallon steel aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) and ancillary equipment from the interior of Building 88, a former lubricating oil storage facility, and the related exposed piping underneath Mike wharves M3 and M4 at Merry Point, Pearl Harbor Naval Complex. The Proposed Action would have an adverse effect on Building 88, a historic property, due to the removal of the original ASTs and ancillary equipment. CNRH has complied with Sections 106 and I 10(f) of the National Historic Preservation Act by affording the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Secretary of the Interior, and other parties the opportunity to consult on the proposed undertaking, and by executing a Memorandum of Agreement that stipulates measures to minimize and mitigate potential adverse effects. Based on information gathered during preparation of the Environmental Assessment, the Navy finds that the Proposed Action will not significantly impact human health or the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.

Record of Decision (ROD) for Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for Proposed Developments at Naval Base Pearl Harbor

Record of Decision (ROD) for Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for Proposed Developments at Naval Base Pearl Harbor PDF Author: United States. Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Pacific Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Navy-yards and naval stations
Languages : en
Pages : 16

Get Book Here

Book Description


Programmatic EIS, Ford Island Development, Pearl Harbor

Programmatic EIS, Ford Island Development, Pearl Harbor PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 400

Get Book Here

Book Description


Environmental Assessment, Building 1G Demolition, Pearl Harbor Naval Complex, O'ahu, Hawaii

Environmental Assessment, Building 1G Demolition, Pearl Harbor Naval Complex, O'ahu, Hawaii PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 42

Get Book Here

Book Description
Commander Navy Region Hawaii (CNRH) proposes to demolish Building 1G to reduce the Navy's excess facilities at Pearl Harbor Main Base. Demolishing Building 1G will eliminate future operations and maintenance costs associated with the facility and allow limited resources to be applied to higher priority mission-related activities. Alternatives evaluated include Layaway and No Action. The Layaway Alternative is not economical as no reuse of the facility could be identified. The Layaway and No Action Alternatives were not selected since they would not achieve the Navy's objectives. The Proposed Action would have an adverse effect on contributing properties and the historic character of the PHNHL. CNRH has complied with Sections 106 and Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) by affording the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), the National Park Service and other consulting parties the opportunity to comment. CNRH and ACHP executed a Memorandum of Agreement to conclude consultations pursuant to the NHPA's implementing regulations, 36 CFR Part 800. Mitigation measures required in the MOA were developed and are being implemented as described in the EA. The Proposed action will not significantly impact human health or the environment.