Evaluating Outcomes of Raising Speed Limits on High Speed Non-freeways PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Evaluating Outcomes of Raising Speed Limits on High Speed Non-freeways PDF full book. Access full book title Evaluating Outcomes of Raising Speed Limits on High Speed Non-freeways by Timothy J. Gates. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Timothy J. Gates
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Speed limits
Languages : en
Pages : 123
Get Book Here
Book Description
The purpose of this research was to assist in determining the potential impacts of implementing a proposed 65 mph speed limit on non-freeways in Michigan. Consideration was given to a broad range of performance measures, including operating speeds, traffic crashes and crash severity, infrastructure costs, fuel consumption, and travel times. Specifically, a prioritization strategy was developed to identify candidate MDOT non-freeway road segments possessing lower safety risks and potential infrastructure costs associated with raising the speed limit from 55 to 65 mph. Ultimately, approximately 747 miles of undivided and 26 miles of divided 55 mph non-freeways were identified as lower risk candidates, representing approximately one-eighth of the MDOT systemwide mileage posted at 55 mph. An economic analysis of the anticipated costs and benefits associated with the proposed speed limit increase was performed for these lower risk candidate segments, in addition to a systemwide estimate. As the travel time savings were expected to outweigh the fuel consumption costs, it was necessary to determine if these net operational benefits outweighed the expected infrastructure upgrade costs and increased crash costs. For roadways possessing horizontal and/or vertical alignments that are not compliant with a 65 mph speed limit, an unfavorable benefit/cost ratio would likely result due to the excessive infrastructure costs incurred during 3R (resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation) or 4R (reconstruction) projects. Crashes were expected to increase for all implementation scenarios, with a particular increase in the risk of fatal and incapacitating injuries. Due to the substantially large infrastructure costs, application of the 65 mph speed limit is specifically not recommended for non-freeway segments requiring horizontal or vertical realignment to achieve design speed compliance. Even for segments where compliance with the increased design speed is maintained, careful consideration must be given to the potential safety impacts particularly to fatal and injury crashes - that may result after increasing the speed limit.
Author: Timothy J. Gates
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Speed limits
Languages : en
Pages : 123
Get Book Here
Book Description
The purpose of this research was to assist in determining the potential impacts of implementing a proposed 65 mph speed limit on non-freeways in Michigan. Consideration was given to a broad range of performance measures, including operating speeds, traffic crashes and crash severity, infrastructure costs, fuel consumption, and travel times. Specifically, a prioritization strategy was developed to identify candidate MDOT non-freeway road segments possessing lower safety risks and potential infrastructure costs associated with raising the speed limit from 55 to 65 mph. Ultimately, approximately 747 miles of undivided and 26 miles of divided 55 mph non-freeways were identified as lower risk candidates, representing approximately one-eighth of the MDOT systemwide mileage posted at 55 mph. An economic analysis of the anticipated costs and benefits associated with the proposed speed limit increase was performed for these lower risk candidate segments, in addition to a systemwide estimate. As the travel time savings were expected to outweigh the fuel consumption costs, it was necessary to determine if these net operational benefits outweighed the expected infrastructure upgrade costs and increased crash costs. For roadways possessing horizontal and/or vertical alignments that are not compliant with a 65 mph speed limit, an unfavorable benefit/cost ratio would likely result due to the excessive infrastructure costs incurred during 3R (resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation) or 4R (reconstruction) projects. Crashes were expected to increase for all implementation scenarios, with a particular increase in the risk of fatal and incapacitating injuries. Due to the substantially large infrastructure costs, application of the 65 mph speed limit is specifically not recommended for non-freeway segments requiring horizontal or vertical realignment to achieve design speed compliance. Even for segments where compliance with the increased design speed is maintained, careful consideration must be given to the potential safety impacts particularly to fatal and injury crashes - that may result after increasing the speed limit.
Author:
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISBN: 9780309065023
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 444
Get Book Here
Book Description
TRB Special Report 254 - Managing Speed: Review of Current Practices for Setting and Enforcing Speed Limits reviews practices for setting and enforcing speed limits on all types of roads and provides guidance to state and local governments on appropriate methods of setting speed limits and related enforcement strategies. Following an executive summary, the report is presented in six chapters and five appendices.
Author: Kara Kockelman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Roads
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Get Book Here
Book Description
TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Research Results Digest 303: Safety Impacts and Other Implications of Raised Speed Limits on High-Speed Roads explores the effects of raised speed limits from 55 miles per hour or greater on freeways and non-freeways in rural and urban settings. The effects considered included impacts on safety and operations, as well as socioeconomic and environmental effects. The full report is available on the TRB website as NCHRP Web-Only Document 90.
Author: United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Speed limits
Languages : en
Pages : 92
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Gerry John Forbes
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781933452654
Category : Speed limits
Languages : en
Pages : 107
Get Book Here
Book Description
"This informational report describes four primary practices and methodologies (engineering approach, expert systems, optimization, and injury minimization) that are used in establishing speed limits. It also reviews the basic legalities of speed limits and presents several case studies for setting speed limits on a variety of roads"--Provided by publisher.
Author: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Operating Subcommittee on Traffic Engineering
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Speed limits
Languages : en
Pages : 66
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: European Conference of Ministers of Transport
Publisher: OECD Publishing
ISBN: 9282103781
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 286
Get Book Here
Book Description
Speeding is the number one road safety problem in a large number of OECD/ECMT countries. It is responsible for around one third of the current, unacceptably high levels of road fatalities. Speeding has an impact not only on accidents but also on the ...
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Transportation, Aviation, and Materials
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Speed limits
Languages : en
Pages : 144
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: W. A. Leaf
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 138
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Michael D. Fontaine
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobile drivers
Languages : en
Pages : 87
Get Book Here
Book Description
This report presents the results of a field implementation of credible, well-enforced, and highly publicized speed limits on two limited access highways in Virginia. The two locations studied were the US 29 bypass around Altavista, VA and the US 58/US 220 bypass around Martinsville, VA. At both of these locations, an engineering study recommended that the posted speed limit be increased from 55 mph to 65 mph. Virginia State Police provided an additional 40 hours per month of overtime enforcement on the study sections for 1 year at the Martinsville site and 15 months at the Altavista site. A public information and education (PI & E) campaign that consisted of media reports, informational handouts, and educational roadside signs was also implemented to try to increase compliance with the new posted speed limits. Before and after data on public perception, crash experience, and speed were analyzed to assess the impact of the program. The public perception survey results showed that the new 65 mph speed limits were well supported by the public, with over 80 percent agreeing with the new speed limits. The speed data analysis showed that the average speed increased by a statistically significant margin of 3 to 4 mph immediately after the new speed limit was implemented. Speeds remained constant following the implementation of the new speed limit, even after the increased enforcement and the education campaign ended. A speed analysis by vehicle type showed some minor variations in how vehicles responded to the changes in speed limit, enforcement, and PI & E. These differences were usually not very large, however. No negative safety impacts were observed during the evaluation. The overall number of crashes did not change by a statistically significant margin relative to historic trends, although the number of severe crashes at the Martinsville site did decline by a statistically significant amount and the crash rate at Altavista showed more than a 20 percent decline. Speed variance did not significantly change between the period with the 55 mph limit and the period with the 65 mph limit. This suggests that crash likelihood was not increased due to the increased posted speed limit. The coefficient of variation of the speeds decreased slightly following the increase in speed limit, potentially indicating that interactions between vehicles may have declined slightly. The demonstration proved to be a success, with the change in speed limit being well supported by the public. Strict compliance with the posted speed limits improved from 5 to 10 percent before the project began to between 45 and 50 percent. The percentage of drivers traveling 10 mph or more over the limit declined from over 20 percent to only 2 to 3 percent. Survey respondents reported that the roadside signs were noticed the most often of any PI & E effort used, likely due to the fact that both sites were located on through routes in rural areas.
