Author: Charles Scawthorn
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Building failures
Languages : en
Pages : 198
Book Description
Estimation of Earthquake Losses in Los Angeles
Author: Charles Scawthorn
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Building failures
Languages : en
Pages : 198
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Building failures
Languages : en
Pages : 198
Book Description
A Study of Earthquake Losses in the Los Angeles, California Area
Author: Environmental Research Laboratories
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Disaster relief
Languages : en
Pages : 676
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Disaster relief
Languages : en
Pages : 676
Book Description
estimating losses from future earthquakes
Author: Committee On Earthquake Engineering Panel on Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN:
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 247
Book Description
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN:
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 247
Book Description
Metropolitan San Francisco and Los Angeles Earthquake Loss Studies
Author: Karl V. Steinbrugge
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Earthquakes
Languages : en
Pages : 98
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Earthquakes
Languages : en
Pages : 98
Book Description
Estimating Losses from Future Earthquakes
Author:
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN:
Category : Buildings
Languages : en
Pages : 98
Book Description
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN:
Category : Buildings
Languages : en
Pages : 98
Book Description
Earthquake Losses Under Workers Compensation and General Liability
Author: Don G. Friedman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Earthquake insurance
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Earthquake insurance
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Book Description
HAZUS(r) MH Estimated Annualized Earthquake Losses for the United States (FEMA 366 / April 2008)
Author: Federal Emergency Agency
Publisher: FEMA
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 66
Book Description
Recent earthquakes around the world show a pattern of steadily increasing damages and losses that are due primarily to two factors: (1) significant growth in earthquake-prone urban areas and (2) vulnerability of the older building stock, including buildings constructed within the past 20 years. In the United States, earthquake risk has grown substantially with development while the earthquake hazard has remained relatively constant. Understanding the hazard requires studying earthquake characteristics and locales in which they occur while understanding the risk requires an assessment of the potential damage to the built environment and to the welfare of people - especially in high risk areas. Estimating the varying degree of earthquake risk throughout the United States is useful for informed decision-making on mitigation policies, priorities, strategies, and funding levels in the public and private sectors. For example, potential losses to new buildings may be reduced by applying seismic design codes and using specialized construction techniques. However, decisions to spend money on either of those solutions require evidence of risk. In the absence of a nationally accepted criterion and methodology for comparing seismic risk across regions, a consensus on optimal mitigation approaches has been difficult to reach. While there is a good understanding of high risk areas such as Los Angeles, there is also growing recognition that other regions such as New York City and Boston have a low earthquake hazard but are still at high risk of significant damage and loss. This high risk level reflects the dense concentrations of buildings and infrastructure in these areas constructed without the benefit of modern seismic design provisions. In addition, mitigation policies and practices may not have been adopted because the earthquake risk was not clearly demonstrated and the value of using mitigation measures in reducing that risk may not have been understood. This study highlights the impacts of both high risk and high exposure on losses caused by earthquakes. It is based on loss estimates generated by HAZUS(R)-MH, a geographic information system (GIS)-based earthquake loss estimation tool developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in cooperation with the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS). The HAZUS tool provides a method for quantifying future earthquake losses. It is national in scope, uniform in application, and comprehensive in its coverage of the built environment.
Publisher: FEMA
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 66
Book Description
Recent earthquakes around the world show a pattern of steadily increasing damages and losses that are due primarily to two factors: (1) significant growth in earthquake-prone urban areas and (2) vulnerability of the older building stock, including buildings constructed within the past 20 years. In the United States, earthquake risk has grown substantially with development while the earthquake hazard has remained relatively constant. Understanding the hazard requires studying earthquake characteristics and locales in which they occur while understanding the risk requires an assessment of the potential damage to the built environment and to the welfare of people - especially in high risk areas. Estimating the varying degree of earthquake risk throughout the United States is useful for informed decision-making on mitigation policies, priorities, strategies, and funding levels in the public and private sectors. For example, potential losses to new buildings may be reduced by applying seismic design codes and using specialized construction techniques. However, decisions to spend money on either of those solutions require evidence of risk. In the absence of a nationally accepted criterion and methodology for comparing seismic risk across regions, a consensus on optimal mitigation approaches has been difficult to reach. While there is a good understanding of high risk areas such as Los Angeles, there is also growing recognition that other regions such as New York City and Boston have a low earthquake hazard but are still at high risk of significant damage and loss. This high risk level reflects the dense concentrations of buildings and infrastructure in these areas constructed without the benefit of modern seismic design provisions. In addition, mitigation policies and practices may not have been adopted because the earthquake risk was not clearly demonstrated and the value of using mitigation measures in reducing that risk may not have been understood. This study highlights the impacts of both high risk and high exposure on losses caused by earthquakes. It is based on loss estimates generated by HAZUS(R)-MH, a geographic information system (GIS)-based earthquake loss estimation tool developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in cooperation with the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS). The HAZUS tool provides a method for quantifying future earthquake losses. It is national in scope, uniform in application, and comprehensive in its coverage of the built environment.
Estimation of Earthquake Losses to Housing in California
Author: Geological Survey (U.S.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
California Earthquake Zoning and Probable Maximum Loss Evaluation Program: an Analysis of Potential Insured Earthquake Losses from Questionnaires Submitted by Property/casualty Insurers in California
Author: Richard J. Roth
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 109
Book Description
The insurance industry has paid out more than 15 billion for the January 17, 1994, Northridge earthquake. And the scientists report that more such earthquakes in the Los Angeles area are probable in the near future. While no insurers went out of business after the Northridge earthquake, the financial impact was severely constricting for insurers of all sizes. There have been no damage causing earthquakes in the five years since the Northridge earthquake.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 109
Book Description
The insurance industry has paid out more than 15 billion for the January 17, 1994, Northridge earthquake. And the scientists report that more such earthquakes in the Los Angeles area are probable in the near future. While no insurers went out of business after the Northridge earthquake, the financial impact was severely constricting for insurers of all sizes. There have been no damage causing earthquakes in the five years since the Northridge earthquake.
Estimation of Earthquake Losses to Single Family Dwellings
Author: W. Rinehart
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Buildings
Languages : en
Pages : 408
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Buildings
Languages : en
Pages : 408
Book Description