EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Panel Formation Process PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Panel Formation Process PDF full book. Access full book title EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Panel Formation Process by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental policy
Languages : en
Pages : 25
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental policy
Languages : en
Pages : 25
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental policy
Languages : en
Pages : 10
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: J. Alfredo Gomez
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781457869129
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) formulates rules to protect the environment and public health. EPA obtains advice and recommendations from the Science Advisory Board (SAB) and the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) -- two federal advisory committees that review the scientific and technical basis for EPA decision-making. The SAB is required to provide both the EPA Administrator and designated congressional committees with scientific advice as requested. CASAC is required, among other things, to provide advice to the Administrator on national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). This report examines (1) the extent to which EPA procedures for processing congressional requests to the SAB ensure compliance with regulations; (2) the extent to which CASAC has provided advice related to NAAQS; and (3) policies EPA has to ensure that the SAB and CASAC maintain their independence when performing their work. Tables and figure. This is a print on demand report.
Author: United States Government Accountability Office
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781977949509
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
EPA formulates rules to protect the environment and public health. To enhance the quality and credibility of such rules, EPA obtains advice and recommendations from the SAB and CASAC-two federal advisory committees that review the scientific and technical basis for EPA decision-making. ERDDAA requires the SAB to provide both the EPA Administrator and designated congressional committees with scientific advice as requested. Amendments to the Clean Air Act established CASAC to, among other things, provide advice to the Administrator on NAAQS. GAO was asked to look into how the SAB and CASAC are fulfilling their statutory obligations in providing such advice. This report examines (1) the extent to which EPA procedures for processing congressional requests to the SAB ensure compliance with ERDDAA; (2) the extent to which CASAC has provided advice related to NAAQS; and (3) policies EPA has to ensure that the SAB and CASAC maintain their independence when performing their work. GAO reviewed relevant federal regulations and agency documents, and interviewed EPA, SAB, and other relevant officials.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: U S Government Accountability Office (G
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781289123796
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 54
Get Book Here
Book Description
This report reviews whether the policies and procedures of the Environmental Protection Agency's Science Advisory Board ensure that (1) its peer review panelists are independent and the panels are properly balanced and (2) the public is sufficiently informed about the points of view represented on the panels. GAO found that the policies and procedures used by the staff office to ensure the independence of the Board's peer reviewers and the balancing of viewpoints have limitations that reduce their effectiveness. The staff office has not systematically requested information that is needed to assess the independence and overall balance of viewpoints represented on the panel--such as previous public positions the panelists have taken on the matter being reviewed--until the first meeting, when the panelists have already been chosen. Furthermore, conflicts of interest may not be identified and mitigated in a timely manner. GAO also found that the staff office's policies and procedures for providing the public with information on the backgrounds of the Board's peer review panelists do not adequately inform the public about the points of view represented on the panels.
Author: U S Government Accountability Offi Gao
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781072523406
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
EPA's Science Advisory Board: Improved Procedures Needed to Process Congressional Requests for Scientific Advice
Author: United States Accounting Office (GAO)
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781984929358
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Get Book Here
Book Description
GAO-01-536 EPA's Science Advisory Board Panels: Improved Policies and Procedures Needed to Ensure Independence and Balance
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 24
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Peter Weingart
Publisher: Verlag Barbara Budrich
ISBN: 3866497687
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 164
Get Book Here
Book Description
Are there connections between the structures of political systems and types of scientific advice to policymak - ing? This volume unites case studies from the Netherlands, France, the European Union and the USA that provide an overview of different institutional arrangements, focusing on issues such as the independence and balance of advice. Common to all is the question which forms of advice can increase the rationality of policymaking without loss of political legitimacy. From the Contents: Mark B. Brown: Federal Advisory Committees in the United States Paul den Hoed and Anne-Greet Keizer: The Scientific Council for Government Policy David Demortain: Designing Regulatory Tools for Pharmaceutical and Food Safety in the European Union Laurent Geffroy, Odile Piriou and Bénédicte Zimmermann: Scientific Expertise in Policy-Making: The Case of Work Policy in France Willem Halffman: The Dutch ́ ́Planning Bureaus ́ ́
