Effect of Variety, Planting Date and Plant Population on Yield and Quality of Snap Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Seed

Effect of Variety, Planting Date and Plant Population on Yield and Quality of Snap Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Seed PDF Author: Tarciso de Sousa Filgueiras
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Kidney bean
Languages : en
Pages : 71

Get Book Here

Book Description
The objectives of these experiments were to determine the feasibility of saving seed from snap bean fields in the Willamette Valley that have been bypassed for canning and freezing, and to study the effects of different seed production methods on yield and quality of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field experiments were conducted over a period of two years at the Oregon State University Vegetable Research Farm at Corvallis. The cultivars OSU 1604 and Asgrow 290 were used in these trials. Planting dates in 1975 were May 17, June 20, and July 3, and in 1976 were April 29, May 13, June 4, and June 22. Seeding rates of 165,000, 330,000 and 495,000 seeds/ha were used in both years. The quality of the harvested seed was assessed in terms of germination, seed size, protein content, seedling root length, seedling dry weight, halo blight infection, and field performance. The data indicate that technically it is feasible to produce snap bean seed in the Willamette Valley with yield and quality equal to those produced in traditional seed production areas. It is also suggested that high quality bean seed can be harvested from fields that have been bypassed for processing, provided they have been planted. The seed production methods tested affected nearly all aspects of the crop. Early plantings provided greater yields and delayed plantings decreased yields up to 62%. When planting was delayed until July 3, no seed was harvested because the crop did not mature before the fall rains. The three seeding rates tested did not affect total seed yield appreciably. Laboratory evaluations in 1975 showed no appreciable effects of planting date and seeding rate on seed quality. Field evaluation, however, showed that for Asgrow 290, seeds from the second planting had better stands and produced 20% more pods than seeds from the first planting. Likewise, seeds grown at low density produced 10% and 23% more pods than seeds grown at medium and high densities, respectively. OSU 1604 was not affected by cultural practices. In 1976, yield and seed quality of both cultivars were affected by planting date and seeding rate in the following ways: early plantings and low seeding rates produced greater yields, larger and heavier seeds and heavier seedlings. Late plantings and high seeding rates depressed yields, seed size and seedling weight. Protein content of seed was not affected by either of these variables.

Effect of Variety, Planting Date and Plant Population on Yield and Quality of Snap Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Seed

Effect of Variety, Planting Date and Plant Population on Yield and Quality of Snap Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Seed PDF Author: Tarciso de Sousa Filgueiras
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Kidney bean
Languages : en
Pages : 71

Get Book Here

Book Description
The objectives of these experiments were to determine the feasibility of saving seed from snap bean fields in the Willamette Valley that have been bypassed for canning and freezing, and to study the effects of different seed production methods on yield and quality of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field experiments were conducted over a period of two years at the Oregon State University Vegetable Research Farm at Corvallis. The cultivars OSU 1604 and Asgrow 290 were used in these trials. Planting dates in 1975 were May 17, June 20, and July 3, and in 1976 were April 29, May 13, June 4, and June 22. Seeding rates of 165,000, 330,000 and 495,000 seeds/ha were used in both years. The quality of the harvested seed was assessed in terms of germination, seed size, protein content, seedling root length, seedling dry weight, halo blight infection, and field performance. The data indicate that technically it is feasible to produce snap bean seed in the Willamette Valley with yield and quality equal to those produced in traditional seed production areas. It is also suggested that high quality bean seed can be harvested from fields that have been bypassed for processing, provided they have been planted. The seed production methods tested affected nearly all aspects of the crop. Early plantings provided greater yields and delayed plantings decreased yields up to 62%. When planting was delayed until July 3, no seed was harvested because the crop did not mature before the fall rains. The three seeding rates tested did not affect total seed yield appreciably. Laboratory evaluations in 1975 showed no appreciable effects of planting date and seeding rate on seed quality. Field evaluation, however, showed that for Asgrow 290, seeds from the second planting had better stands and produced 20% more pods than seeds from the first planting. Likewise, seeds grown at low density produced 10% and 23% more pods than seeds grown at medium and high densities, respectively. OSU 1604 was not affected by cultural practices. In 1976, yield and seed quality of both cultivars were affected by planting date and seeding rate in the following ways: early plantings and low seeding rates produced greater yields, larger and heavier seeds and heavier seedlings. Late plantings and high seeding rates depressed yields, seed size and seedling weight. Protein content of seed was not affected by either of these variables.

A Study of the Relation of Method of Planting to Yield in Beans, (Phaseolus Vulgaris)

A Study of the Relation of Method of Planting to Yield in Beans, (Phaseolus Vulgaris) PDF Author: Merl Conrad Gillis
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Beans
Languages : en
Pages : 140

Get Book Here

Book Description


Bibliography of Agriculture

Bibliography of Agriculture PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Agriculture
Languages : en
Pages : 1732

Get Book Here

Book Description


Physiology, Quality, and Agronomic Performance of Snap Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) and Spring Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) as Affected by Environment and Several Plant Growth Regulators

Physiology, Quality, and Agronomic Performance of Snap Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) and Spring Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) as Affected by Environment and Several Plant Growth Regulators PDF Author: Mahlon Malcolm Schallig Hile
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Growth regulators
Languages : en
Pages : 410

Get Book Here

Book Description
Experiments were conducted to determine the effect of environment and several plant growth regulators on the physiology, quality, and agronomic performance of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The potassium salts of naphthenic acid and cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, received particular attention. Application of potassium naphthenate solutions to the foliage of 14-day-old wheat seedlings caused significant reductions in height for the first 4 weeks after treatment. Reductions were observed in water-soluble sugars in the shoots and roots. Accompanying increases in water-soluble protein and free amino acids were measured in the shoots. No significant effect on amino acid levels was noted in the roots but increases were observed in soluble protein. The reductions in sugars and increases in proteins and amino acids indicate a shunting of carbon skeletons from carbohydrate to nitrogen metabolism. Under field conditions, 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid (ethephon) and(2-chloroethyl) trimethylammonium chloride (chlormequat) regardless of rate or time of application produced significant reductions in wheat plant height. Ethephon was more effective in height reduction than chlormequat. Potassium cyclohexanecarboxylate and potassium naphthenate in many cases significantly increased the length of the uppermost internodes. Differential wheat cultivar response to growth regulator application was evident with the exception of plant height and associated measurements which were similar between cultivars with a given regulator. Changes in grain nutritional quality components exemplify these differential responses. Vitamin content was generally lowered by potassium naphthenate, and potassium naphthenate and potassium cyclohexanecarboxylate lowered the mineral content of the grain. Individual quality components appeared to be affected independently. No significant increase in snap bean yield resulted from regulator treatments in the field. Protein content was significantly increased in spring-planted snap bean pods by at least one rate of all the regulators studied with the exception of potassium cyclohexancarboxylate which lowered protein. Several growth regulators produced significant increases of B-carotene content in summerplanted snap beans whereas, ascorbic acid was significantly reduced by all applications in the spring but not in the summer planting. Controlled environment experiments where high temperature and low relative humidity were imposed had little effect on pod protein and B-carotene content. In contrast, ascorbic acid content was drastically reduced the first day after exposure to stress conditions. Though plants tended to adjust to their new growing conditions, after 5 days they had not reached levels of ascorbic acid found in unstressed control plants. Treatment with potassium naphthenate tended to lower levels more and retard adjustment to the higher temperatures. Nutritional quality in snap bean pods appeared to be affected more by the prevailing environmental conditions near harvest even though yield varied greatly between cultivars and to a lesser extent between dates of planting. Ascorbic acid content appears to be more sensitive to seasonal fluctuation in environment than B-carotene or protein content, as large variations in ascorbic acid content between planting dates were evident. Subjection of cultivars to growth at 80 and 50% relative humidity resulted in differences in growth habit though no differences were observed in yield or nutrient content. The relative ranking of yield of cultivars in controlled environments differed from that observed in the field though differences in B-carotene and ascorbic acid contents were similar. A comprehensive review of the literature pertaining to the effects of naphthenates on plants is discussed in detail. In addition, an exhaustive summarized review of the effects of naphthenates on biological systems (plants, microorganisms, warm and coldblooded animals) illustrates the wide range of biological actions of this series of naturally occurring petroleum acids.

Some Cultural and Environmental Factors Affecting Snap Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Growth and Root Rot Incidence

Some Cultural and Environmental Factors Affecting Snap Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Growth and Root Rot Incidence PDF Author: Ali Khalafalla Mohamed
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Kidney bean
Languages : en
Pages : 346

Get Book Here

Book Description


Plant Breeding Abstracts

Plant Breeding Abstracts PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Plant breeding
Languages : en
Pages : 582

Get Book Here

Book Description


Effect of Row Spacing and Planting Density on Seed Yield and Quality in Dry Beans, Phaseolus Vulgaris L

Effect of Row Spacing and Planting Density on Seed Yield and Quality in Dry Beans, Phaseolus Vulgaris L PDF Author: Eugene Joseph McAvoy
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Beans
Languages : en
Pages : 248

Get Book Here

Book Description


Agrindex

Agrindex PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Agriculture
Languages : en
Pages : 936

Get Book Here

Book Description


O.S.U. Theses and Dissertations, 1978-1982

O.S.U. Theses and Dissertations, 1978-1982 PDF Author: Oregon State University
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 64

Get Book Here

Book Description


Response of Certain Varieties of Snap Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris) to Seed Treatments

Response of Certain Varieties of Snap Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris) to Seed Treatments PDF Author: Adah Elisabeth Polak Cohn
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Beans
Languages : en
Pages : 100

Get Book Here

Book Description