National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 PDF full book. Access full book title National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 by United States. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Four Confederated Bands of Pawnees
Languages : en
Pages : 450
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Four Confederated Bands of Pawnees
Languages : en
Pages : 450
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 1752
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 268
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 676
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 338
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Thomas E. Mann
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0195368711
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 289
Get Book Here
Book Description
Two nationally renowned congressional scholars review the evolution of Congress from the early days of the republic to 2006, arguing that extreme partisanship and a disregard for institutional procedures are responsible for the institution's current state of dysfunction.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic surveillance
Languages : en
Pages : 944
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Department of Justice
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Justice, Administration of
Languages : en
Pages : 720
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Morton Rosenburg
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781437955880
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 53
Get Book Here
Book Description
The adversarial, often confrontational, and sometimes high profile nature of congressional investigations sets it apart from the more routine, accommodative facets of the oversight process experienced in authorization, appropriations or confirmation exercises. While all aspects of legislative oversight share the common goals of informing Congress so as to best accomplish its tasks of developing legislation, monitoring the implementation of public policy, and of disclosing to the public how its government is performing, the inquisitorial process also sustains and vindicates Congress' role in our constitutional scheme of separated powers and checks and balances. The rich history of congressional investigations from the failed St. Clair expedition in 1792 through Teapot Dome, Watergate, Iran-Contra and Whitewater has established, in law and practice, the nature and contours of congressional prerogatives necessary to maintain the integrity of the legislative role in that constitutional scheme. This report provides an overview of some of the more common legal, procedural and practical issues, questions, and problems that committees have faced in the course of an investigation. This is a print on demand report.
Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Administrative agencies
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
In recent years, congressional concern and public debate have increased about the nature and growing number of earmarks. This report seeks to provide Congress and the public with an understanding of how agencies respond to congressional funding directions by examining how selected executive branch agencies translate these directions from Congress into governmental activities. There have been numerous calls in and out of Congress for earmark reform in response to concerns about the nature and number of earmarks. Both Houses of Congress have taken steps to increase disclosure requirements. The President has also called for earmark reform. In January 2007, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) directed agencies to collect and submit data to it on fiscal year 2005 earmarks in appropriations bills and certain authorization bills. GAO collected and analyzed information on four agencies' processes (i.e., the Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Civil Works programs). Our objectives were to identify, for these agencies, (1) their processes for identifying and categorizing congressional directives; (2) their processes for tracking, implementing, and reporting on congressional directives; and (3) agency officials' views on the trends and impact of congressional directives.
