Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-049 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-049 PDF full book. Access full book title Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-049 by Robert T. Stephan. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
In the absence of a city ordinance providing otherwise, a spouse of a council member may hold the office of city treasurer or the office of cemetery superintendent in a city of the second class having the mayor-council form of government, if such spouse is otherwise qualified to be appointed to the office. Additionally, a council member whose spouse holds a city office in a city of the second class is not disqualified from voting (as member of the city council) upon the remuneration for the office which the spouse holds, or upon other matters affecting said city office. Cited herein: K.S.A. 13-2903, 14-205, 14-537, 75-4304.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
In the absence of a city ordinance providing otherwise, a spouse of a council member may hold the office of city treasurer or the office of cemetery superintendent in a city of the second class having the mayor-council form of government, if such spouse is otherwise qualified to be appointed to the office. Additionally, a council member whose spouse holds a city office in a city of the second class is not disqualified from voting (as member of the city council) upon the remuneration for the office which the spouse holds, or upon other matters affecting said city office. Cited herein: K.S.A. 13-2903, 14-205, 14-537, 75-4304.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The common law doctrine of incompatibility of offices precludes one person from simultaneously holding the offices of city council member and clerk of the municipal court in a city of the third class having a mayor-council form of government. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-4108.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
As amended by chapter 282, section 5, the provisions of chapter 187, section 11 of the 1984 Session Laws prohibit the selling, giving or receiving of lists of names and addresses derived from public records, for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or service to the persons listed therein, subject to three exceptions. Section 6 of chapter 187, as amended by section 3 of chapter 282 of the 1984 Session Laws, further requires that any person who obtains a list of names and addresses certify that: (1) he or she will not use the information for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or services, and (2) will not give, sell or otherwise make available the list to another person so that the latter may sell or offer for sale any property or service. Accordingly, a person may not make commercial use of information derived from such lists, either directly or through the sale of the lists themselves. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 21-3913; 45-201 (both repealed, L. 1984, ch. 187); 74-2012, as amended by L. 1984, ch. 282, section l; L. 1983, ch. 171, section 11, L. 1984, ch. 187, sections 6, 11; L. 1984, ch. 282, sections 3, 5.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Pursuant to K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 22-4501 e̲t̲ s̲e̲q̲., the State Board of Indigent Defense Services has the authority to deny authorization of claims for compensation in cases where the attorneys seeking compensation were appointed without regard to the applicable system for providing legal services to indigent defendants as established by the board. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 22-4501; 22-4503; 22-4507; 22-4522; 22-4523.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 25-2108a(b) prescribes the conditions under which a city utilizing non-partisan elections must hold a primary election. The statute on its face is uniformly applicable to all cities, and is contained in an act (L. 1982, ch. 157) which is also uniform. K.S.A. 25-2113, which is contained in a different act, sets forth a general rule for non-partisan city elections, but also contains a provision for partisan city elections in Johnson County. The inclusion of this provision renders K.S.A. 25-2113 non-uniform, and thereby subject to a charter ordinance under a city's home rule authority. However, in the absence of such an ordinance which would allow partisan elections, the general provisions of K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 25-2108a concerning primary elections continue to apply. To the extent it is inconsistent with this opinion, Attorney General Opinion No. 78-49 is superseded. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 25-2108a, K.S.A. 25-2113, Kan. Const. Art. 12, section 5.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The mayor of a city of the third-class having the mayor-council form of government is not precluded by statute or by the common-law doctrine of incompatibility of offices from also performing the functions of a dog catcher, when such duties are vested in him by city ordinance and do not result in any additional compensation being paid to him. Cited herein: K.S.A. 15-301, 15-1402, 15-1407, 15-1502.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
No state statute prescribes a procedure whereby a city of the third class may change from the commission form of government to the mayor-council form of government. However, the governing body of such a city may, by ordinance adopted pursuant to home rule powers, prescribe that the city shall revert to the mayor-council form of government on the date of the next city election, and provide for the election of a mayor and five council members at that election. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-184, 12-1019, 12-1027, 12-1035, 12-1036h, 12-10a09, 13-1812, 14-1807, 15-124, 15-1201, 15-1704, Kan. Const., Art. 12, section 5.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The provisions of subsections (c) and (d) of K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 77-426, which allow the legislature to reject, modify or revoke an administrative rule and regulation by means of the adoption of a concurrent resolution, are unconstitutional. Such action by the legislature is an unlawful usurpation of the governor's constitutional power to administer and enforce the laws. Such action violates the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers. In addition, the legislative oversight mechanism prescribed in subsections (c) and (d) of K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 77-426 is unconstitutional for the reason that it attempts to authorize the legislature to make law, without following the mandatory procedures of the Kansas Constitution. The Kansas constitution requires that any law be enacted only by bill [not by resolution or concurrent resolution]; that every bill contain the constitutionally-specified enacting clause; and that all bills passed by the legislature be presented to the governor for approval or disapproval. The procedure set forth in subsections (c) and (d) of K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 77-426 does not meet these constitutional requirements and is unconstitutional. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 77-426; Kan. Const., Art. 2, sections 14, 20.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The legislature intended that the term "noneconomic loss," found in K.S.A. 1990 Supp. 65-34,126 and not otherwise defined, have the meaning commonly accorded it and as defined by case law interpreting generally similar statutes. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1990 Supp. 65-34,100; 65-34,102; 65-34,126.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Pursuant to the restrictions of K.S.A. 17-5904, and subject to exemptions prescribed therein, corporations (other than family farm corporations and authorized farm corporations) may not own agricultural land in this state. An investment plan whereby a corporation (other than a family farm corporation or authorized farm corporation) would own agricultural land, subject to a "buyback option," would violate the restrictions of the aforesaid statute. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 17-5903, K.S.A. 17-5904.
