Anderson V. Marathon Petroleum Company

Anderson V. Marathon Petroleum Company PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 56

Get Book Here

Book Description

Anderson V. Marathon Petroleum Company

Anderson V. Marathon Petroleum Company PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 56

Get Book Here

Book Description


Scott V. Marathon Petroleum Company

Scott V. Marathon Petroleum Company PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 46

Get Book Here

Book Description


Wright v. Drury Petroleum Corporation, 229 MICH 542 (1924)

Wright v. Drury Petroleum Corporation, 229 MICH 542 (1924) PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 64

Get Book Here

Book Description
53

Walters V. Marathon Oil Company

Walters V. Marathon Oil Company PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 126

Get Book Here

Book Description


Kelley V. Marathon Oil Company

Kelley V. Marathon Oil Company PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 34

Get Book Here

Book Description


Anderson V. Stauffer Chemical Company

Anderson V. Stauffer Chemical Company PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 24

Get Book Here

Book Description


Marathon Oil Company V. Heath

Marathon Oil Company V. Heath PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 80

Get Book Here

Book Description


Alexander Anderson, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiff, Vs. H. John Eastman, Defendant

Alexander Anderson, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiff, Vs. H. John Eastman, Defendant PDF Author: Alexander Anderson, inc
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Oil well drilling
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


Justifying Strict Liability

Justifying Strict Liability PDF Author: Marco Cappelletti
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0192676075
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 385

Get Book Here

Book Description
The imposition of strict liability in tort law is controversial, and its theoretical foundations are the object of vigorous debate. Why do or should we impose strict liability on employers for the torts committed by their employees, or on a person for the harm caused by their children, animals, activities, or things? In responding to this type of questions, legal actors rely on a wide variety of justifications. Justifying Strict Liability explores, in a comparative perspective, the most significant arguments that are put forward to justify the imposition of strict liability in four legal systems, two common law, England and the United States, and two civil law, France and Italy. These justifications include: risk, accident avoidance, the 'deep pockets' argument, loss-spreading, victim protection, reduction in administrative costs, and individual responsibility. By looking at how these arguments are used across the four legal systems, this book considers a variety of patterns which characterise the reasoning on strict liability. The book also assesses the justificatory weight of the arguments, showing that these can assume varying significance in the four jurisdictions and that such variations reflect different views as to the values and goals which inspire strict liability and tort law more generally. Overall, the book seeks to improve our understanding of strict liability, to shed light on the justifications for its imposition, and to enhance our understanding of the different tort cultures featuring in the four legal systems studied.

California. Supreme Court. Records and Briefs

California. Supreme Court. Records and Briefs PDF Author: California (State).
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 68

Get Book Here

Book Description
Court of Appeal Case(s): H006561