An Audit Report on American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funds for Selected Programs at the Texas Education Agency PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download An Audit Report on American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funds for Selected Programs at the Texas Education Agency PDF full book. Access full book title An Audit Report on American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funds for Selected Programs at the Texas Education Agency by Texas. Office of the State Auditor. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Texas. Office of the State Auditor
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Texas. Office of the State Auditor
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Texas. Office of the State Auditor
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 41
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Texas. Office of the State Auditor
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Intergovernmental fiscal relations
Languages : en
Pages : 29
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Office of Inspector General (ED)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 33
Get Book Here
Book Description
This final audit report covers the results of the review of five State educational agencies' monitoring plans and awarding processes for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and regular School Improvement Grants funds that the State educational agencies awarded for fiscal year 2009 (for use during school year 2010-2011). The objectives of the audit were to: (1) identify monitoring plans related to School Improvement Grants funds at selected State educational agencies (SEA); and (2) determine whether selected SEAs used award processes that resulted in the appropriate allocations of School Improvement Grants funds only to local educational agencies (LEA) with schools having the greatest need for the funds and to LEAs with the strongest commitment to using the funds to raise student achievement. The audit was conducted at the Florida Department of Education (Florida), Georgia Department of Education (Georgia), New York State Education Department (New York), Ohio Department of Education (Ohio), and Texas Education Agency (Texas). The audit was focused on the five SEAs' monitoring plans and awarding processes for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) and regular School Improvement Grants funds that the SEAs awarded for fiscal year 2009 (for use during school year 2010-2011). For the first objective, the audit period reviewed each SEA varied depending on the dates of our site visits. The audit period for the second objective was March 29, 2010, through December 31, 2010. The following are appended: (1) Monitoring Plans for Florida, Georgia, New York, Ohio, and Texas; and (2) Auditee Comments.
Author: Anderson-Guthrie Carol
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437915310
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 303
Get Book Here
Book Description
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is estimated to cost about $787 billion over the next several years, of which about $280 billion will be administered through states and localities. The Recovery Act requires bimonthly reviews of the use of funds by selected states and localities. This first report describes selected states' and localities': (1) uses of and planning of Recovery Act funds; (2) accountability approaches; and (3) plans to evaluate the impact of funds received. This work is focused on 16 states and the District of Columbia -- representing about 65% of the U.S. population and 2/3 of the intergovernmental fed. assistance available through the Recovery Act. Charts and tables.
Author: Texas. Office of the State Auditor
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 38
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Texas. Office of the State Auditor
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 18
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Texas. Office of the State Auditor
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 20
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Economic stabilization
Languages : en
Pages : 160
Get Book Here
Book Description
This report, the second in response to a mandate under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), addresses the following objectives: (1) selected states' and localities' uses of Recovery Act funds, (2) the approaches taken by the selected states and localities to ensure accountability for Recovery Act funds, and (3) states' plans to evaluate the impact of the Recovery Act funds they received. GAO's work for this report is focused on 16 states and certain localities in those jurisdictions as well as the District of Columbia--representing about 65 percent of the U.S. population and two-thirds of the intergovernmental federal assistance available. GAO collected documents and interviewed state and local officials. GAO analyzed federal agency guidance and spoke with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) officials and with relevant program officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and the U.S. Departments of Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Justice, Labor, and Transportation (DOT). Across the United States, as of June 19, 2009, Treasury had outlayed about $29 billion of the estimated $49 billion in Recovery Act funds projected for use in states and localities in fiscal year 2009. More than 90 percent of the $29 billion in federal outlays has been provided through the increased Medicaid Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) and the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) administered by the Department of Education. GAO's work focused on nine federal programs that are estimated to account for approximately 87 percent of federal Recovery Act outlays in fiscal year 2009 for programs administered by states and localities. Increased Medicaid FMAP Funding All 16 states and the District have drawn down increased Medicaid FMAP grant awards of just over $15 billion for October 1, 2008, through June 29, 2009, which amounted to almost 86 percent of funds available. Medicaid enrollment increased for most of the selected states and the District, and several states noted that the increased FMAP funds were critical in their efforts to maintain coverage at current levels. States and the District reported they are planning to use the increased federal funds to cover their increased Medicaid caseload and to maintain current benefits and eligibility levels. Due to the increased federal share of Medicaid funding, most state officials also said they would use freed-up state funds to help cope with fiscal stresses. Highway Infrastructure Investment As of June 25, DOT had obligated about $9.2 billion for almost 2,600 highway infrastructure and other eligible projects in the 16 states and the District and had reimbursed about $96.4 million. Across the nation, almost half of the obligations have been for pavement improvement projects because they did not require extensive environmental clearances, were quick to design, obligate and bid on, could employ people quickly, and could be completed within 3 years. State Fiscal Stabilization Fund As of June 30, 2009, of the 16 states and the District, only Texas had not submitted an SFSF application. Pennsylvania recently submitted an application but had not yet received funding. The remaining 14 states and the District had been awarded a total of about $17 billion in initial funding from Education--of which about $4.3 billion has been drawn down. School districts said that they would use SFSF funds to maintain current levels of education funding, particularly for retaining staff and current education programs. They also said that SFSF funds would help offset state budget cuts. Accountability States have implemented various internal control programs; however, federal Single Audit guidance and reporting does not fully address Recovery Act risk. The Single Audit reporting deadline is too late to provide audit results in time for the audited entity to take action on deficiencies noted in Recovery Act programs. Moreover, current guidance does not achieve the level of accountability needed to effectively respond to Recovery Act risks. Finally, state auditors need additional flexibility and funding to undertake the added Single Audit responsibilities under the Recovery Act. Impact Direct recipients of Recovery Act funds, including states and localities, are expected to report quarterly on a number of measures, including the use of funds and estimates of the number of jobs created and the number of jobs retained. The first of these reports is due in October 2009. OMB--in consultation with a broad range of stakeholders--issued additional implementing guidance for recipient reporting on June 22, 2009, that clarifies some requirements and establishes a central reporting framework.
Author: Texas. Office of the State Auditor
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 23
Get Book Here
Book Description
