A Review of the President's Recommendation to Develop a Nuclear Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download A Review of the President's Recommendation to Develop a Nuclear Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada PDF full book. Access full book title A Review of the President's Recommendation to Develop a Nuclear Waste Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 350
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 350
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Radioactive waste disposal in the ground
Languages : en
Pages : 294
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Joe Barton
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780756736392
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 294
Get Book Here
Book Description
Witnesses: Spencer Abraham, Sec., Dept. of Energy; Shelley Berkley, a Rep. in Congress from the State of Nevada; Laura Chappelle, Chairwoman, Michigan Public Service Comm.; Jared Cohon, Chmn., Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board; Joe Colvin, Pres. & CEO, Nuclear Energy Institute; Greta Dicus, Commissioner, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.; Jim Dushaw, Dir., Utility Dept., Internat. Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; John Ensign, a U.S. Senator from the State of Nevada; Jim Gibbons, a Rep. in Congress from the State of Nevada; Jeffrey Holmstead, Assist. Admin. for Air & Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; & Gary Jones, Dir., Natural Resources & Environment Team, General Accounting Office.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 300
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: U.s. Nuclear Reglatory Commission
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781500113193
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 484
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Yucca Mountain Review Plan provides guidance for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff to evaluate a U.S. Department of Energy license application for a geologic repository. It is not a regulation and does not impose regulatory requirements. The licensing criteria are contained in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 10, Part 63 (10 CFR Part 63), “Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Proposed Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.” The Secretary of Energy has recommended the Yucca Mountain site to the President for the development of a Yucca Mountain repository. The President has notified Congress that he considers the Yucca Mountain site qualified for application for a construction authorization for a repository. Nevada filed a notice of disapproval of the President's recommendation; however, Congress later approved the site recommendation. The U.S. Department of Energy may now submit a license application to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The principal purpose of the Yucca Mountain Review Plan is to ensure the quality, uniformity, and consistency of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff reviews of the license application and any requested amendments. The Yucca Mountain Review Plan has separate sections for reviews of general information, repository safety before permanent closure, repository safety after permanent closure, the research and development program to resolve safety questions, the performance confirmation program, and administrative and programmatic requirements. Each section addresses determining compliance with specific regulatory requirements from 10 CFR Part 63. The regulations and the Yucca Mountain Review Plan are risk-informed, performance-based to the extent practical.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Radioactive waste disposal in the ground
Languages : en
Pages : 122
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Mark Holt
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437923275
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 27
Get Book Here
Book Description
Contents: (1) Proposals for a New Direction; (2) Baseline: Current Waste Program Projections; (3) Options for Halting or Delaying Yucca Mountain: Withdraw License Application; Reduce Appropriations; Key Policy Appointments; Waste Program Review; (4) Consequences of a Yucca Mountain Policy Shift: Federal Liabilities for Disposal Delays; Licensing Complications for New Power Reactors; Environmental Cleanup Penalties; Long-Term Risk; (5) Nuclear Waste Policy: Options; Institutional Changes; Extended On-Site Storage; Federal Central Interim Storage; Private Central Storage; Spent Fuel Reprocessing and Recycling; Non-Repository Options; New Repository Site; (6) Concluding Discussion.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 278
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Gary Jones
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Radioactive waste disposal
Languages : en
Pages : 14
Get Book Here
Book Description
This testimony discusses the Department of Energy's (DOE) project to develop a nuclear waste repository. As required by law, DOE has been investigating a site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, to determine its suitability for disposing of highly radioactive wastes in a mined geologic repository. On February 14, 2002, the Secretary of Energy recommended to the President approval of this site for the development of a nuclear waste repository. The next day, the President recommended approval of the site to the Congress. The President's recommendation began a statutory review process for the approval or disapproval of the site, including action by the state of Nevada, the Congress, DOE, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) within specified time frames. If the site is approved, DOE must apply to NRC for authorization (a license) to construct a repository. If the site is not approved for a license application, or if NRC denies a license to construct a repository, the administration and the Congress will have to consider other options for the long-term management of existing and future nuclear wastes.
