A Critical Discussion of Recent Decisions in Constitutional Law PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download A Critical Discussion of Recent Decisions in Constitutional Law PDF full book. Access full book title A Critical Discussion of Recent Decisions in Constitutional Law by Eugene M. Prince. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Eugene M. Prince
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Eugene M. Prince
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Helen Roberta MacGregor
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 156
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Carol A. Rehfisch
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 212
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Mark V. Tushnet
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 350
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Clyde Charles Sherwood
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: David John Wilson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 174
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Mildred Mallon Prince
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Conflict of laws
Languages : en
Pages : 140
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: John Hart Ely
Publisher: Harvard University Press
ISBN: 0674263294
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 281
Get Book Here
Book Description
This powerfully argued appraisal of judicial review may change the face of American law. Written for layman and scholar alike, the book addresses one of the most important issues facing Americans today: within what guidelines shall the Supreme Court apply the strictures of the Constitution to the complexities of modern life? Until now legal experts have proposed two basic approaches to the Constitution. The first, “interpretivism,” maintains that we should stick as closely as possible to what is explicit in the document itself. The second, predominant in recent academic theorizing, argues that the courts should be guided by what they see as the fundamental values of American society. John Hart Ely demonstrates that both of these approaches are inherently incomplete and inadequate. Democracy and Distrust sets forth a new and persuasive basis for determining the role of the Supreme Court today. Ely’s proposal is centered on the view that the Court should devote itself to assuring majority governance while protecting minority rights. “The Constitution,” he writes, “has proceeded from the sensible assumption that an effective majority will not unreasonably threaten its own rights, and has sought to assure that such a majority not systematically treat others less well than it treats itself. It has done so by structuring decision processes at all levels in an attempt to ensure, first, that everyone’s interests will be represented when decisions are made, and second, that the application of those decisions will not be manipulated so as to reintroduce in practice the sort of discrimination that is impermissible in theory.” Thus, Ely’s emphasis is on the procedural side of due process, on the preservation of governmental structure rather than on the recognition of elusive social values. At the same time, his approach is free of interpretivism’s rigidity because it is fully responsive to the changing wishes of a popular majority. Consequently, his book will have a profound impact on legal opinion at all levels—from experts in constitutional law, to lawyers with general practices, to concerned citizens watching the bewildering changes in American law.
Author: Alfredo Narváez Medécigo
Publisher: Springer
ISBN: 3319245627
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 275
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book, which originated from the broadly held view that there is a lack of Rule-of-law in Mexico, and from the emphasis of traditional academia on cultural elements as the main explanation, explores the question of whether there is any relationship between the system of constitutional review ― and thus the ‘law’ as such ― and the level of Rule-of-law in a given state. To do so, it elaborates a theoretical model for achieving Rule-of-law and compares it to the constitutional review systems of the United States, the Federal Republic of Germany, and Mexico. The study concludes that the two former states correspond to the model, while the latter does not. This is fundamentally due to the role each legal system assigns to ordinary jurisdiction in carrying out constitutional review. Whereas the US and Germany have fostered the policy that constitutional review regarding the enforcement of basic rights is the responsibility of ordinary courts, Mexico has relied too heavily on the specialized constitutional jurisdiction.
Author: Christopher Wolfe
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
ISBN: 1461645468
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 463
Get Book Here
Book Description
This major history of judicial review, revised to include the Rehnquist court, shows how modern courts have used their power to create new "rights with fateful political consequences." Originally published by Basic Books.
