2010-11 Publicly Reported Assessment Results for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities. Technical Report 68 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download 2010-11 Publicly Reported Assessment Results for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities. Technical Report 68 PDF full book. Access full book title 2010-11 Publicly Reported Assessment Results for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities. Technical Report 68 by Deb Albus. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Deb Albus
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 159
Get Book Here
Book Description
This is the fourteenth report by the National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) that analyzes public reporting practices for assessment data for students with disabilities in K-12 schools in the United States. This report includes information about both the 50 regular states and the 11 unique states (American Samoa, Bureau of Indian Education, Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, U.S. Department of Defense Education Activities, District of Columbia, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, Puerto Rico, Republic of the Marshall Islands, and U.S. Virgin Islands). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) require states to disaggregate performance data at the state and district level. For the 2010-11 school year, 53 of the 61 states reported participation and performance data for students with disabilities for all general assessments within the ESEA accountability system. Fifty-one states reported participation and performance data for alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) that were within the ESEA system. Information about state assessments outside of ESEA is also presented. Reporting for English Language Learners (ELLs) with disabilities also was examined in this report. Only four states reported both participation and performance for the general assessment for this group. More states (n = 20) reported both participation and performance data for ELLs with disabilities on the AA-AAS. Most states reported participation and performance data by individual grade and test for students with disabilities, though a few only reported data that merged grades or tests. Forty-seven of the regular states reported student performance by achievement level, and 39 reported the percent proficient. Many states reported data on accommodations use. This report also presents the results of an analysis of the ease of finding publicly reported data for students with disabilities on states' websites. This involved counting the number of mouse clicks that it took to arrive at public reports for the general and AA-AAS assessments on state department of education websites. For 33 of the regular states it took 1-2 clicks to find the general assessment information; 5 or more clicks were required in 11 states. The following appendices are included: (1) Example letter to Assessment Director and Special Education Director; (2) Example Verification Tables Sent to States; (3) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners with Disabilities on Regular State Tests in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2010-2011; (4) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities on State Alternates Based on Alternate Achievement Standards (AA-AAS) in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2010-2011; (5) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities on State Alternates Based on Modified Achievement Standards (AAMAS) in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2010-2011; (6) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities on English Language Proficiency Assessments for Fifty States and Unique States for 2010-2011; (7) Ways States Disaggregated Participation Data for Students with Disabilities for Regular Assessments; (8) How Participation was Reported in States Using Any Reporting Method on Regular Assessments in the Fifty States, 2010-2011; (9) Participation "Reported by Grade and Test" for Students with Disabilities on Regular Assessments, 2010-2011; (10) Participation Reported "by Grade and Test" for Students with Disabilities on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards (AA-AAS), 2010-2011; (11) Summary of How States Reported Participation Rates on the Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards (AA-MAS), 2010-2011; (12) Key for State and Unique State Abbreviations; (13) Ways States Disaggregated Performance Data for Students with Disabilities for Regular Assessments, 2010-11; (14) How Performance was Reported in States Using Any Reporting Method on Regular Assessments in the Fifty States, 2010-2011; (15) How Performance Was Reported "by Grade and Test" for Students with Disabilities on Regular Assessments in the Fifty States and Unique States, 2010-2011; (16) How Performance Was Reported "by Grade and Test" for Students with Disabilities on the Alternate Assessment Based on Alternate Achievement Standards (AA-AAS) in the Fifty States and Unique States, 2010-2011; (17) Number of States Reporting Different Accommodation Status Categories for Any Population, 2010-2011; (18) Number of States Reporting Participation and Performance by Accommodated Condition for Any Student Population; and (19) How States Reported Accommodations Data by Test and Grade for Participation and Performance, 2010-2011.
Author: Deb Albus
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 159
Get Book Here
Book Description
This is the fourteenth report by the National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) that analyzes public reporting practices for assessment data for students with disabilities in K-12 schools in the United States. This report includes information about both the 50 regular states and the 11 unique states (American Samoa, Bureau of Indian Education, Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, U.S. Department of Defense Education Activities, District of Columbia, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, Puerto Rico, Republic of the Marshall Islands, and U.S. Virgin Islands). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) require states to disaggregate performance data at the state and district level. For the 2010-11 school year, 53 of the 61 states reported participation and performance data for students with disabilities for all general assessments within the ESEA accountability system. Fifty-one states reported participation and performance data for alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) that were within the ESEA system. Information about state assessments outside of ESEA is also presented. Reporting for English Language Learners (ELLs) with disabilities also was examined in this report. Only four states reported both participation and performance for the general assessment for this group. More states (n = 20) reported both participation and performance data for ELLs with disabilities on the AA-AAS. Most states reported participation and performance data by individual grade and test for students with disabilities, though a few only reported data that merged grades or tests. Forty-seven of the regular states reported student performance by achievement level, and 39 reported the percent proficient. Many states reported data on accommodations use. This report also presents the results of an analysis of the ease of finding publicly reported data for students with disabilities on states' websites. This involved counting the number of mouse clicks that it took to arrive at public reports for the general and AA-AAS assessments on state department of education websites. For 33 of the regular states it took 1-2 clicks to find the general assessment information; 5 or more clicks were required in 11 states. The following appendices are included: (1) Example letter to Assessment Director and Special Education Director; (2) Example Verification Tables Sent to States; (3) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners with Disabilities on Regular State Tests in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2010-2011; (4) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities on State Alternates Based on Alternate Achievement Standards (AA-AAS) in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2010-2011; (5) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities on State Alternates Based on Modified Achievement Standards (AAMAS) in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2010-2011; (6) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities on English Language Proficiency Assessments for Fifty States and Unique States for 2010-2011; (7) Ways States Disaggregated Participation Data for Students with Disabilities for Regular Assessments; (8) How Participation was Reported in States Using Any Reporting Method on Regular Assessments in the Fifty States, 2010-2011; (9) Participation "Reported by Grade and Test" for Students with Disabilities on Regular Assessments, 2010-2011; (10) Participation Reported "by Grade and Test" for Students with Disabilities on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards (AA-AAS), 2010-2011; (11) Summary of How States Reported Participation Rates on the Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards (AA-MAS), 2010-2011; (12) Key for State and Unique State Abbreviations; (13) Ways States Disaggregated Performance Data for Students with Disabilities for Regular Assessments, 2010-11; (14) How Performance was Reported in States Using Any Reporting Method on Regular Assessments in the Fifty States, 2010-2011; (15) How Performance Was Reported "by Grade and Test" for Students with Disabilities on Regular Assessments in the Fifty States and Unique States, 2010-2011; (16) How Performance Was Reported "by Grade and Test" for Students with Disabilities on the Alternate Assessment Based on Alternate Achievement Standards (AA-AAS) in the Fifty States and Unique States, 2010-2011; (17) Number of States Reporting Different Accommodation Status Categories for Any Population, 2010-2011; (18) Number of States Reporting Participation and Performance by Accommodated Condition for Any Student Population; and (19) How States Reported Accommodations Data by Test and Grade for Participation and Performance, 2010-2011.
Author: Martha L. Thurlow
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 137
Get Book Here
Book Description
This is the thirteenth annual report by the National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) that analyzes public reporting practices of assessment data for students with disabilities in K-12 schools in the United States. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) required states to disaggregate performance data at the state and district level. This year marks the tenth annual reporting period since this requirement was established, and the seventh reporting period since the 2001 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). For school year (SY) 2008-09, the number of regular states publicly reporting disaggregated data for both participation and performance for students with disabilities taking regular assessments maintained at 46 states from the previous year. However, this year marked the first time that all 50 states disaggregated data for at least some regular tests for ESEA accountability systems. For regular states reporting on alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS), 45 states had at least some data reported, up from 36 the previous year. Among these, 44 states reported both participation and performance data. Although reporting practices for regular assessments have changed little for 2008-09 compared to the previous years, this year did mark the first time all 50 states reported disaggregated data for at least some state assessments in ESEA accountability systems. Reporting on AA-AAS also improved over the previous two years. Further, all states with AA-MAS reported participation and performance data. For performance, although there were increased mean gaps for students with disabilities and regular students on regular assessments across all grades and content areas, the mean performance for students in both populations showed improvement in all grades and content areas, but regular students showed larger mean gains compared to last year. Unique states held steady with reporting on regular assessments, and made some improvement in the number of states reporting on AA-AAS. Further, with the inclusion of ELLs with disabilities in this report, the authors saw that although fewer states report on these students for regular assessments, this number also is increasing over prior reports. Nearly half of the regular states report on AA-AAS for this population. For Title III ELP assessments, half of the regular states that publicly reported data for ELLs did so for ELLs with disabilities. Finally, the publicly disaggregated participation and performance data described in this report covered a variety of state assessments based on state content standards. States have increased the breadth of their reporting over the years, to some extent due to additional testing options but also due to more detailed reporting and reporting data not reported previously. Appended are: (1) Example Letter to Assessment Director; (2) Example Letter to Special Education Director; (3) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities on Regular State Tests in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2008-2009; (4) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities and ELLs with Disabilities on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2008-2009; (5) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities on Alternate Assessments Based on Modified Achievement Standards in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2008-2009; (6) How Participation was Reported for Students with Disabilities on Regular Assessments in the Fifty States for 2008-2009; (7) How Participation was Reported for ELLs with Disabilities on Regular Assessments in the Fifty States for 2008-2009; (8) How Participation was Reported for Students with Disabilities on Alternates Based on Alternate Achievement Standards in the Fifty States for 2008-2009; (9) How Participation was Reported for ELLs with Disabilities on Alternates Based on Alternate Achievement Standards in the Fifty States for 2008-2009; (10) How Performance was Reported for Students with Disabilities on Regular Assessments in the Fifty States for 2008-2009; (11) How Performance was Reported for ELLs with Disabilities on Regular Assessments in the Fifty States for 2008-2009; (12) How Performance was Reported for Students with Disabilities on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards in the Fifty States for 2008-2009; (13) How Performance was Reported for ELLs with Disabilities on Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards in the Fifty States for 2008-2009; (14) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for ELLs with Disabilities on Title III English Language Proficiency Assessment Data in the Fifty States for 2008-2009; and (15) Status of Disaggregated Reporting for Students Using Accommodations on State Assessments in the Fifty States for 2008-2009. (Contains 9 tables and 34 figures.).
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309169380
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 102
Get Book Here
Book Description
At the request of the U.S. Department of Education, the National Research Council's (NRC) Board on Testing and Assessment (BOTA) convened a workshop on reporting test results for individuals who receive accommodations during large-scale assessments. The workshop brought together representatives from state assessment offices, individuals familiar with testing students with disabilities and English-language learners, and measurement experts to discuss the policy, measurement, and score use considerations associated with testing students with special needs.
Author: Martha L. Thurlow
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Get Book Here
Book Description
This report is the sixth analysis of state reports conducted by the National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) to examine the extent to which states publicly report information about students with disabilities in statewide assessments. Descriptions of statewide testing systems are presented and examined as to whether these systems included participation and performance information for students with disabilities, as indicated by publicly available data. The majority of the information was obtained by analyzing states' Department of Education Web sites. If disaggregated information was not posted, the states were then asked to submit public documents that included these results. The following are appended: (1) Verification Letter to State Assessment Director; (2) Letters to State Directors of Special Education; (3) 2001-2002 State Assessment Systems and Status of Disaggregated Data; (4) Disaggregated Participation Information; (5) Participation Rate Analyses; (6) Alternate Assessment Participation Information; (7) Participation and Performance for Accommodations; (8) Web-based Reporting; and (9) Performance Data for Reading and Math Assessments. (Contains 18 figures and 1 table. Individual appendices contain additional tables.).
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 386
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Chris Bremer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 165
Get Book Here
Book Description
This is the twelfth annual report by the National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) analyzing public reporting of disaggregated assessment data for elementary and secondary students with disabilities in the United States. Reporting disaggregated performance data at the state and district level to the public is required of states by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA); the 2007-2008 school year marks the ninth annual reporting period since this requirement was established, and the sixth reporting period since the 2001 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). For the 2007-2008 school year, the number of regular states publicly reporting disaggregated data for both participation and performance for students with disabilities taking regular assessments fell from 46 to 45. Thirty-six states provided disaggregated participation and performance data for students with disabilities taking alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) for 2007-2008; this number remained the same as in 2006-2007. Reporting of regular assessments in the ESEA accountability system, by type, for regular states showed a pattern similar to 2006-2007, with 100% reporting participation and performance on norm-referenced tests (NRT), combination NRT and criterion-referenced tests (NRT/CRT), and exit exams (EXIT), but lower levels of reporting on the most common test type, CRTs. Although a greater number of CRTs were used, the percentage of those on which states reported fell from 89% to 85%. Reporting on regular assessments was provided by 49 regular states in 2007-2008, the same number as in 2006-2007. Reporting on AA-AAS was provided by 43 regular states in 2007-2008, down from 44 states in 2006-2007. For the unique states, four reported both participation and performance data for regular assessments. One unique state reported both participation and performance data for AA-AAS. The public reporting of participation and performance for 2007-2008 assessments was fairly consistent with the reporting in 2006-2007. There continues to be a need for states to report clearly, to publicly report on accommodations use, and to strive to make the data that are reported accessible to those who seek them via public Web sites. Appendices include: (1) Example Letter to Assessment Director; (2) Example Letter to Special Education Director; (3) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities on Regular State Tests in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2007-2008; (4) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities on State Alternates Based on Alternate Achievement Standards (AA-AAS) in the Fifty States and Unique States for 2007-2008; (5) Status of Disaggregated Data (Participation and Performance) for Students with Disabilities on Alternates Based on Modified Achievement Standards (MAS) in the Fifty States for 2007-08; (6) Disaggregated Participation Information for Students with Disabilities on Regular State Tests for the Fifty States and Unique States for 2007-2008; (7) Disaggregated Alternate Assessment Participation Information for Students with Disabilities on Regular State Tests for the Fifty States and Unique States for 2007-2008; (8) Disaggregated Regular Assessment Performance Information for Students with Disabilities for the Fifty States and Unique States for 2007-2008; (9) Disaggregated Alternate Assessment Performance Information for Students with Disabilities for the Fifty States and Unique States for 2007-2008; and (10) Participation and Performance for Students Tested with Accommodations for 2007-2008. (Contains 9 tables and 21 figures.).
Author: National Center on Educational Outcomes, Minneapolis, MN.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 73
Get Book Here
Book Description
This report marks the eighth analysis conducted by the National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) of the public reporting of state assessment results for students with disabilities. This is the third analysis that NCEO has conducted since the passage of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Overall, a total of 48 states reported some state-level information about students with disabilities on their state assessments: 35 reported participation and performance for all their general assessments, 11 reported participation and performance data for some of these, 2 reported only performance information, and 2 did not report information. When considering only tests that were part of NCLB accountability systems, more states reported all information publicly: 44 states reported participation and performance information for all these assessments, 2 reported participation and performance information for some of these assessments, 2 reported only performance information for all these assessments, and 2 did not report information. Overall, this report reinforces what was found for the 2002-2003 school year data. States are improving their public reporting practices, but the improvement is gradual. These improvements include more states reporting test information for accountability tests and an increase in information provided on alternate assessments. However, there are still improvements that need to be made. This report discusses the results of the study and provides recommendations for how states can continue to improve their public reporting practices. The following are appended: (1) Verification Letter to State Assessment Director; (2) Letters to State Directors of Special Education; (3) 2003-2004 State Assessment Systems and Status of Disaggregated Data; (4) Disaggregated Participation Information (Given for State-Level Data); (5) Participation Rate Analyses; (6) Disaggregated Alternate Assessment Participation Information (Given for State-Level Data); (7) 2003-2004 Alternate Assessments; (8) Participation and Performance for Students Tested with Accommodations; and (9) Performance Data for Reading and Math Assessments. (Contains 26 figures and 2 tables.).
Author: Education Department
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781636710129
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 346
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Condition of Education 2020 summarizes important developments and trends in education using the latest available data. The report presentsnumerous indicators on the status and condition of education. The indicators represent a consensus of professional judgment on the most significant national measures of the condition and progress of education for which accurate data are available. The Condition of Education includes an "At a Glance" section, which allows readers to quickly make comparisons across indicators, and a "Highlights" section, which captures key findings from each indicator. In addition, The Condition of Education contains a Reader's Guide, a Glossary, and a Guide to Sources that provide additional background information. Each indicator provides links to the source data tables used to produce the analyses.
Author: Christopher J. Johnstone
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 25
Get Book Here
Book Description
Finding ways to improve the design of large-scale tests is a timely issue. Recent changes in Federal legislation (including the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001) have placed greater emphasis on accountability via large-scale tests. Students who have previously been exempted from large-scale assessments, including students with disabilities and English language learners, are now expected to reach achievement levels comparable to their non-disabled or English proficient peers. Schools are held accountable for their performance, and their scores are reported publicly. With such high stakes placed on large-scale assessment, there is a critical need for states to have valid information about how the design of assessments affects student test performance. This report provides information on the use of "think aloud methods" to detect design issues in large-scale assessments. Various design problems may introduce construct-irrelevant variance or hinder students from showing what they know on assessments. Research included a variety of students, including students with learning disabilities, students with hearing impairments, students with cognitive disabilities, English language learners, and students without disabilities who were proficient in English. In this project, the authors asked students to "think out loud" when solving mathematics large-scale assessment items. The sentences that students uttered produced data that led the authors to believe that think aloud methods, under certain circumstances, can successfully detect design issues. Specifically, they found issues related to unclearly defined constructs, inaccessibility of items, unclear instructions, incomprehensible language, and illegible text and graphics. To this end, think aloud methods appear to be a useful strategy in the design and refinement of large-scale assessments. Think aloud methods, as the authors designed them, were not effective for students with cognitive disabilities. This population had great difficulty in producing the language needed to explain problem-solving processes and may require additional research accommodations to help them participate in think aloud research. All other groups sufficiently participated in research activities. Think aloud methods also did not produce informative data for very difficult mathematics items because students had difficulty verbalizing their thoughts while solving problems. Despite shortcomings found in this study, the think aloud method appears to be an effective way to determine the effects of item design for a wide variety of students (with the exception of students with cognitive disabilities) and for items with low to moderate difficulty levels. (Contains 6 tables and 2 figures.).
Author: Board on Testing and Assessment
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780309381789
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 102
Get Book Here
Book Description
At the request of the U.S. Department of Education, the National Research Council's (NRC) Board on Testing and Assessment (BOTA) convened a workshop on reporting test results for individuals who receive accommodations during large-scale assessments. The workshop brought together representatives from state assessment offices, individuals familiar with testing students with disabilities and English-language learners, and measurement experts to discuss the policy, measurement, and score use considerations associated with testing students with special needs.
