Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 336
Book Description
United States V. Booker
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 336
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 336
Book Description
United States of America V. Booker
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Book Description
Final Report on the Impact of United States V. Booker on Federal Sentencing
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial discretion
Languages : en
Pages : 143
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial discretion
Languages : en
Pages : 143
Book Description
Report on the Continuing Impact of United States V. Booker on Federal Sentencing
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial discretion
Languages : en
Pages : 115
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial discretion
Languages : en
Pages : 115
Book Description
Guidelines Manual
Author: United States Sentencing Commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal justice, Administration of
Languages : en
Pages : 556
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal justice, Administration of
Languages : en
Pages : 556
Book Description
United States V. Booker
Author: United States. Congress
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781984931931
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 332
Book Description
United States v. Booker : one year later, chaos or status quo? : hearing before the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, March 16, 2006.
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781984931931
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 332
Book Description
United States v. Booker : one year later, chaos or status quo? : hearing before the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, March 16, 2006.
Johnson Versus California (2005)
Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1203
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1203
Book Description
United States of America V. Booker
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Demographic Differences in Federal Sentencing Practices
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial discretion
Languages : en
Pages : 120
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial discretion
Languages : en
Pages : 120
Book Description
The Effect of the Supreme Court's Ruling of U.S. V Booker On Sentence Length in the District of Connecticut
Author: Gregory Campos
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Sentences (Criminal procedure)
Languages : en
Pages : 78
Book Description
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), was a landmark Supreme Court Case that made the Federal Sentencing Guidelines advisory rather than mandatory. Prior to this ruling, U.S. District Judges had limited options if they wanted to sentence outside of the guidelines (also called a departure). The purpose of this study is to examine what effect, if any, an advisory guideline has had on sentence length in the District of Connecticut. It is this writer's belief that sentence lengths for the crimes prosecuted in Connecticut U.S. District Courts have dropped since the Booker ruling in 2005. The reasoning for this is, while Judges wanted some guidelines in place, they did not want to lose their ability to form appropriate sentences based on the facts presented to them. The nature of the mandatory sentencing guidelines created limitations on the Judge's ability to use their years of training and education to impose just sentences. This hypothesis was evaluated two ways. First, there was a comparison of the mean sentence length for all crimes prosecuted in the District of Connecticut prior to the Booker decision (1999-2004) and after (2006-2011). Second, there was a comparison of the mean sentence length for drug and firearm cases during the same two time periods. A third hypothesis was evaluated. Given that the guidelines were intended to create parity in sentencing it should be expected that reduction of mean sentence lengths will remain consistent during the studied timeframe for white and black defendants. The results of the data analysis showed a reduction in mean sentence length, a reduction in firearm and drug sentence length overall, and a reduction when comparing black and white sentence length. The results in this study could be used to improve sentencing outcomes for defendants who are sentenced under the guidelines.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Sentences (Criminal procedure)
Languages : en
Pages : 78
Book Description
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), was a landmark Supreme Court Case that made the Federal Sentencing Guidelines advisory rather than mandatory. Prior to this ruling, U.S. District Judges had limited options if they wanted to sentence outside of the guidelines (also called a departure). The purpose of this study is to examine what effect, if any, an advisory guideline has had on sentence length in the District of Connecticut. It is this writer's belief that sentence lengths for the crimes prosecuted in Connecticut U.S. District Courts have dropped since the Booker ruling in 2005. The reasoning for this is, while Judges wanted some guidelines in place, they did not want to lose their ability to form appropriate sentences based on the facts presented to them. The nature of the mandatory sentencing guidelines created limitations on the Judge's ability to use their years of training and education to impose just sentences. This hypothesis was evaluated two ways. First, there was a comparison of the mean sentence length for all crimes prosecuted in the District of Connecticut prior to the Booker decision (1999-2004) and after (2006-2011). Second, there was a comparison of the mean sentence length for drug and firearm cases during the same two time periods. A third hypothesis was evaluated. Given that the guidelines were intended to create parity in sentencing it should be expected that reduction of mean sentence lengths will remain consistent during the studied timeframe for white and black defendants. The results of the data analysis showed a reduction in mean sentence length, a reduction in firearm and drug sentence length overall, and a reduction when comparing black and white sentence length. The results in this study could be used to improve sentencing outcomes for defendants who are sentenced under the guidelines.