Tick Size, Order Handling Rules, and Trading Costs

Tick Size, Order Handling Rules, and Trading Costs PDF Author: Kee H. Chung
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
We show that the effect of the tick-size change on NASDAQ spreads depends critically on the Order Handling Rules (OHR). Our empirical results show that the tick-size reduction has no impact on the spread of NASDAQ issues that were not subject to the new OHR, but has a significant effect on the spread of NASDAQ issues that were subject to the OHR. These results indicate that smaller tick sizes are valuable in reducing market friction only if market makers compete on price with public traders. Our results are in line with the finding of prior studies that execution costs are lower in auction markets than in pure dealer markets.

Tick Size, Order Handling Rules, and Trading Costs

Tick Size, Order Handling Rules, and Trading Costs PDF Author: Kee H. Chung
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
We show that the effect of the tick-size change on NASDAQ spreads depends critically on the Order Handling Rules (OHR). Our empirical results show that the tick-size reduction has no impact on the spread of NASDAQ issues that were not subject to the new OHR, but has a significant effect on the spread of NASDAQ issues that were subject to the OHR. These results indicate that smaller tick sizes are valuable in reducing market friction only if market makers compete on price with public traders. Our results are in line with the finding of prior studies that execution costs are lower in auction markets than in pure dealer markets.

Tick Size and Trading Costs

Tick Size and Trading Costs PDF Author: Kee H. Chung
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26

Get Book Here

Book Description
Theory suggests that a reduction in tick size will cause spreads to narrow on the NYSE due to the time priority rule which encourages specialists and traders to improve price. The effect of tick size on spreads is likely to be small in dealer markets (such as Nasdaq) because dealers have little incentive to improve price. Our empirical results show that the tick size reduction has no impact on the spread of Nasdaq issues that were not subjected to the new order handling rules (OHR). In contrast, the tick size reduction has a significant effect on the spread of NYSE issues and Nasdaq issues that were subjected to the OHR. These results indicate that the new OHR compel Nasdaq dealers and limit order traders to compete on price to obtain order flow. We find that the tick size change has a significant effect on the quoted depth of NYSE issues, but no effect on the quoted depth of Nasdaq issues. Our results indicate that decimalization is likely to narrow spreads, decrease dealer payments for order flow, and reduce order preferencing arrangements.

Stock Market Structure, Volatility, and Volume

Stock Market Structure, Volatility, and Volume PDF Author: Hans R. Stoll
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 88

Get Book Here

Book Description


Institutional Trading Costs and Alternative Trading Systems

Institutional Trading Costs and Alternative Trading Systems PDF Author: Jennifer S. Conrad
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Using proprietary data, we examine institutional orders and trades filled by alternative electronic trading systems. Our data consist of almost 800,000 orders (corresponding to 2.15 million trades) worth approximately $1.6 trillion, between the first quarter of 1996 and the first quarter of 1998. These data allow us to distinguish between orders filled by day and after-hours crossing systems, electronic communication networks (ECNs) and traditional brokers. We find that crossing systems are used largely to execute orders in listed stocks, while ECNs concentrate in Nasdaq stocks. On average, broker-filled orders are larger, have longer duration, and higher fill rates than orders executed by alternative trading systems. Controlling for variation in order characteristics, difficulty, and endogeneity in the choice of trading venue, we find that realized execution costs are generally lower on crossing systems and ECNs. Order handling rules and tick size changes implemented in 1997 appear to reduce the cost advantage of trading on ECNs. Our results shed light on the emergence of alternative electronic trading systems that provide significant competition for order flow, for both exchanges and dealer markets.

Liquidity, Markets and Trading in Action

Liquidity, Markets and Trading in Action PDF Author: Deniz Ozenbas
Publisher: Springer Nature
ISBN: 3030748170
Category : Business enterprises
Languages : en
Pages : 111

Get Book Here

Book Description
This open access book addresses four standard business school subjects: microeconomics, macroeconomics, finance and information systems as they relate to trading, liquidity, and market structure. It provides a detailed examination of the impact of trading costs and other impediments of trading that the authors call rictions It also presents an interactive simulation model of equity market trading, TraderEx, that enables students to implement trading decisions in different market scenarios and structures. Addressing these topics shines a bright light on how a real-world financial market operates, and the simulation provides students with an experiential learning opportunity that is informative and fun. Each of the chapters is designed so that it can be used as a stand-alone module in an existing economics, finance, or information science course. Instructor resources such as discussion questions, Powerpoint slides and TraderEx exercises are available online.

Trade Execution Costs on Nasdaq and the NYSE

Trade Execution Costs on Nasdaq and the NYSE PDF Author: Hendrik Bessembinder
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : NASDAQ (Computer network)
Languages : en
Pages : 48

Get Book Here

Book Description


The Impacts of Tick Size Reduction in a Market with Multiple Tick Sizes

The Impacts of Tick Size Reduction in a Market with Multiple Tick Sizes PDF Author: Hung-Kun Chen
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 39

Get Book Here

Book Description
We analyze the impact of tick size reduction on market quality, placing particular focus on whether a multiple tick rule helps to mitigate the impact of a tick rule size reduction in purely order-driven markets. Using a novel dataset covering an entire limit order book, our results suggest that the tick size reduction resulted in substantial declines in effective spread, quote depth, and market depth throughout the limit order book, whereas no significant effects on either trading volume or volatility are discernible. The multiple tick schedule does not eliminate divergence in the market quality for stocks in the same tick size group or across tick size groups. Within the same tick size group, spread and depth are reduced more for those stocks with lower prices, larger capitalization levels, and higher trading frequency. Across tick size groups, the impact of the tick size reduction is found to be stronger for groups where the original tick size was more of a binding constraint and for those groups which experienced a larger (relative) tick size reduction. Overall, our results suggest that a smaller tick size has reduced transaction costs for small trades yet impaired the provision of liquidity, particularly for large trades in high capitalization and more frequently-traded stocks. As a result, the net benefit of the new tick size schedule cannot be confirmed with certainty.

Tick Size, Liquidity for Small and Large Orders, and Price Informativeness

Tick Size, Liquidity for Small and Large Orders, and Price Informativeness PDF Author: Kee H. Chung
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 85

Get Book Here

Book Description
Using limit order books across all U.S. exchanges, we show that while liquidity for small orders (e.g., the quoted and effective spreads) decreases, liquidity for large orders (e.g., the cumulative depth and the price impact of multiple trades) improves after the implementation of the Tick Size Pilot Program. We find significant spillover effects on liquidity for small and large orders which extend beyond the top of the book. Finally, we show that the pilot program results in an improvement in pricing efficiency, an increase in trade size, and a decrease in the number of trades.

Implications of a Reduction in Tick Size on Short-Sell Order Execution

Implications of a Reduction in Tick Size on Short-Sell Order Execution PDF Author: Gordon J. Alexander
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission is committed to having exchanges fully implement decimal pricing by April 9, 2001, and is also considering revising the Uptick Rule. We consider the likely impact of the pending smaller tick size associated with decimalization on the efficacy of this rule by examining the execution quality of NYSE short-sell orders immediately before and after the tick size was reduced from 1/8th to 1/16th in 1997. We conclude that, in general, short market orders will receive better execution after decimalization, but at-the-quote limit orders will receive worse execution, and suggest revisions to the Rule.

The MiFID II Tick Size Regime. Impact on European Equities Trading

The MiFID II Tick Size Regime. Impact on European Equities Trading PDF Author: Daniel Fritzler
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
ISBN: 3668936692
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 64

Get Book Here

Book Description
Bachelor Thesis from the year 2018 in the subject Business economics - Investment and Finance, grade: 1,3, University of Frankfurt (Main) (Professur für e-Finance), language: English, abstract: Before the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID I) was applied in 2007, exchanges were able to implement their own tick size without being concerned about competition, since trading was concentrated to the incumbent exchanges. The increased fragmentation and competition after the introduction of MiFID I in Europe started a race between the incumbent exchanges and alternative venues towards everfiner tick sizes in order to offer better prices and gain market share. Over the past few years, this trend has increased and caused adverse effects on the market quality. On March 3rd, 2018, MiFID II introduced a harmonized tick size regime that takes each stock's price and liquidity into account in order to address the negative impact of the \race to the bottom" that began with MiFID I. The aim of this bachelor thesis is to investigate whether the introduction of the MiFID II tick size regime has achieved its desired effect of positively impacting the European equity market quality. Therefore, I will study and summarize the existing literature about the general effect of tick size changes on security markets, whereby I distinguish between tick size changes that are caused by changes in tick size rules and price movements. Furthermore, I will introduce the main concepts of the new regulatory framework Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II / Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFID II/MiFIR) with a focus on the new tick size regime and its consequences for the European market. The core of this paper is the empirical study on the effects of tick size changes brought about by MiFID II's tick size regime on market quality, using data from the German home market Xetra. I will first investigate the overall impact of the regime on the most frequently traded stocks listed on Xetra by observing different measures of liquidity, such as transaction costs, market depth, trading volumes and price volatility. In addition, I provide separate results for the different effects of decreases and increases in tick size. Secondly, I examine the impact of the new regulatory framework and its tick size regime on the market share redistribution in Europe. This allows to determine whether the contentious exemption of systematic internalisers from the regime creates an unfair advantage at the expense of regulated markets.