The Microsoft Settlement PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Microsoft Settlement PDF full book. Access full book title The Microsoft Settlement by United States. Congress. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781985579798
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 118
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Microsoft settlement : a look to the future : hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, first session, December 12, 2001.
Author: United States. Congress
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781985579798
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 118
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Microsoft settlement : a look to the future : hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Seventh Congress, first session, December 12, 2001.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 120
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 120
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Antitrust law
Languages : en
Pages : 120
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: David S. Sibley
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
On November 6, 2001, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Microsoft Corporation reached an agreement on the terms of a proposed settlement. The proposed decree brought to a conclusion the most closely followed antitrust case in history. This paper examines whether the antitrust remedy embodied in the settlement was in the "public interest." Key components of the public interest standard of the Tunney Act are satisfied when the antitrust remedy is sufficient to (1) stop the offending conduct, (2) prevent its reoccurrence, and (3) restore competitive conditions.
Author: Michael Chubinsky
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
United States v. Microsoft is a monumentally important court decision that had a major impact on forming the way in which we access the internet. This case permitted internet browsers to be bundled with operating systems. Thus, upon the purchase of an operating system, the browser is offered at no additional charge. This vital aspect of the case's outcome raises a number of questions, and warrants further study. What are the ramifications of offering internet browsers free of charge on the marketplace? Did this result hamper the government's ability to accomplish its initial regulatory goals? How does regulation of this matter in the United States compare to other countries? Further examination of this topic, with a focus on these questions, yields a wealth of knowledge about one of the world's largest antitrust disputes. Consequently, such research will hopefully help improve future antitrust regulation.
Author: Andrew I. Gavil
Publisher: MIT Press
ISBN: 0262027763
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 461
Get Book Here
Book Description
A comprehensive account of the decades-long, multiple antitrust actions against Microsoft and an assessment of the effectiveness of antitrust law in the digital age. For more than two decades, the U.S. Department of Justice, various states, the European Commission, and many private litigants pursued antitrust actions against the tech giant Microsoft. In investigating and prosecuting Microsoft, federal and state prosecutors were playing their traditional role of reining in a corporate power intent on eliminating competition. Seen from another perspective, however, the government's prosecution of Microsoft—in which it deployed the century-old Sherman Antitrust Act in the volatile and evolving global business environment of the digital era—was unprecedented. In this book, two experts on competition policy offer a comprehensive account of the multiple antitrust actions against Microsoft—from beginning to end—and an assessment of the effectiveness of antitrust law in the twenty-first century. Gavil and First describe in detail the cases that the Department of Justice and the states initiated in 1998, accusing Microsoft of obstructing browser competition and perpetuating its Windows monopoly. They cover the private litigation that followed, and the European Commission cases decided in 2004 and 2009. They also consider broader issues of competition policy in the age of globalization, addressing the adequacy of today's antitrust laws, their enforcement by multiple parties around the world, and the difficulty of obtaining effective remedies—all lessons learned from the Microsoft cases.
Author: Jay Dratler
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
With the recent rejection of the last holdout state's objections to the federal settlement in Microsoft IV, the last shoe appears to have dropped in this mammoth litigation. After all the dust had settled, Microsoft had essentially written its own remedy, albeit under considerable pressure. This piece reviews the lessons, both legal and strategic, that can be learned from the case. The piece begins with a discussion of the two main antitrust claims against Microsoft: (1) monopolization by extending its operating-system monopoly, and (2) tying its Internet browser to its monopoly O/S platform. The piece explores why the D.C. Circuit affirmed liability on the first and reversed a finding of liability on the second, as well as on a related attempt claim. It then provides a detailed critique of the D.C. Circuit's analysis and the government's handling of the case. The piece criticizes the D.C. Circuit's reversal of liability for attempting to monopolize and for tying on two grounds. First, it finds little precedent in law, and little reason in economics, for the court's ipse dixit that attempt and tying claims invariably require proof of barriers to entry in the defined market - far less structural barriers of the kind the court apparently had in mind. Second, the piece finds the court guilty of something approaching willful blindness in failing to notice that virtually all the conduct the court itself discussed under the heading of monopolization of the O/S market in fact created substantial barriers to entry into the browser market. Finally, the piece reviews the court's extraordinary dictum to the effect that the computer software industry is somehow different for antitrust purposes and finds it inconsistent with voluminous Supreme Court precedent and economically irrational. The piece then examines the government's litigation strategy of putting virtually all its eggs in one basket: the theory that Microsoft extended its O/S monopoly by removing the threat to that monopoly posed by browsers as middleware. It shows how reliance on that convoluted theory virtually precluded any substantial remedy by making it impossible to demonstrate a causal relationship between remedy and wrong. Finally, the piece discusses the government's failure to prove a relevant market for the tying claim, thereby not only abandoning a claim in which causation should have been easier to prove, but also inviting a disastrous holding that encourages monopolists of dominant software platforms to gobble up add-ons, too. The piece concludes with a suggestion for litigation strategy keeping the remedy in mind and a nod to the European Union for picking up the ball dropped by U.S. antitrust authorities.
Author: William H. Page
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
ISBN: 0226644650
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 363
Get Book Here
Book Description
In 1998, the United States Department of Justice and state antitrust agencies charged that Microsoft was monopolizing the market for personal computer operating systems. More than ten years later, the case is still the defining antitrust litigation of our era. William H. Page and John E. Lopatka’s The Microsoft Case contributes to the debate over the future of antitrust policy by examining the implications of the litigation from the perspective of consumer welfare. The authors trace the development of the case from its conceptual origins through the trial and the key decisions on both liability and remedies. They argue that, at critical points, the legal system failed consumers by overrating government’s ability to influence outcomes in a dynamic market. This ambitious book is essential reading for business, law, and economics scholars as well as anyone else interested in the ways that technology, economics, and antitrust law have interacted in the digital age. “This book will become the gold standard for analysis of the monopolization cases against Microsoft. . . . No serious student of law or economic policy should go without reading it.”—Thomas C. Arthur, Emory University
