The Influence of Strategic and Organizational Cultures on the Revolution in Military Affairs (Rma) Within the U.S. Army - Analysis of the Interwar Per PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Influence of Strategic and Organizational Cultures on the Revolution in Military Affairs (Rma) Within the U.S. Army - Analysis of the Interwar Per PDF full book. Access full book title The Influence of Strategic and Organizational Cultures on the Revolution in Military Affairs (Rma) Within the U.S. Army - Analysis of the Interwar Per by U. S. Military. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: U. S. Military
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781798997017
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 100
Get Book Here
Book Description
This study explores the influence of culture on the requirements for a Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA). It assesses how cultural factors at the strategic and the U.S. Army organizational levels may affect the changes required for realizing an RMA. Defined as a paradigmatic shift in the conduct of military affairs spurred by the confluence of organizational change with new and existing technologies and concepts of operations, the RMA has long been a controversial analytical construct. This thesis accepts the premise that the history of warfare can be interpreted as a series of RMAs. It explores the complex and powerful influence of American strategic culture and the organizational culture of the U.S. Army on the organizational, doctrinal, technology, funding and other factors vital to the realization of an RMA. The study compares the influence of U.S. strategic and Army organizational culture on the RMA during the interwar period (1919-1941) and the contemporary period (since the 2011 withdrawal of U.S. combat forces from Iraq) to highlight similarities and differences that U.S. military and civilian leaders can learn from to change the paradigm of military affairs in America's favor.This compilation includes a reproduction of the 2019 Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community. I. INTRODUCTION * A. RESEARCH INQUIRY * B. RESEARCH CHALLENGES * C. LITERATURE REVIEW * 1. Strategic Culture * a. The First Generation of Literature on Strategic Culture * b. The Second Generation of Literature on Strategic Culture * c. The Third Generation of Literature on Strategic Culture * 2. Organizational Culture * a. Approaches to Defining Organizational Culture * b. Approaches to Studying Culture * D. U.S. SECURITY STRATEGY AND U.S. ARMY TRANSFORMATION * 1. The Interwar Period * a. Strategy * b. U.S. Army Transformation * 2. Contemporary Period since the Iraq War * a. Strategy * b. U.S. Army Transformation * E. METHODS AND SOURCES * F. THESIS ORGANIZATION * II. INFLUENCE OF INTERWAR CULTURE ON THE REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS * A. STRATEGIC CULTURE * 1. Interwar Era U.S. Politics, Defense Policy and the RMA * 2. The American Way of War and the RMA (Interwar Period) * 3. Force and Diplomacy in U.S. Foreign Policy and the RMA * 4. The National Cognitive Style and the RMA (Interwar Era) * B. U.S. ARMY CULTURE AND THE RMA IN THE INTERWAR PERIOD * 1. Army Doctrine, Change and the RMA in the Interwar Period * 2. Army Organization, Change and the RMA in the Interwar Period * 3. Army Materiel, Change and the RMA in the Interwar Period * C. CONCLUSION * III. INFLUENCE OF CONTEMPORARY CULTURE ON THE REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS * A. STRATEGIC CULTURE AND THE RMA IN THE CONTEMPORARY PERIOD (2011-PRESENT) * 1. Contemporary U.S. Politics, Defense Policy and the RMA * 2. The American Way of War, and the RMA * 3. Force and Diplomacy in U.S. Foreign Policy and the RMA * 4. The National Cognitive Style and the RMA * B. U.S. ARMY CULTURE AND THE RMA IN THE CONTEMPORARY PERIOD * 1. Army Doctrine Change and the RMA in the Contemporary Period * 2. Army Organization, Change and the RMA in the Contemporary Period * 3. Army Materiel, Change and the RMA in the Contemporary Period * C. CONCLUSION * IV. MANAGING CULTURE TO ACHIEVE AN RMA * A. MANAGING STRATEGIC CULTURE TO ACHIEVE AN RMA * 1. U.S. Politics, Defense Policy and the RMA * 2. The American Way of War * 3. Force and Diplomacy in U.S. Foreign Policy and the RMA * 4. The National Cognitive Style and the RMA * B. MANAGING ARMY CULTURE IN PURSUIT OF AN RMA * V. CONCLUSION
Author: U. S. Military
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781798997017
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 100
Get Book Here
Book Description
This study explores the influence of culture on the requirements for a Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA). It assesses how cultural factors at the strategic and the U.S. Army organizational levels may affect the changes required for realizing an RMA. Defined as a paradigmatic shift in the conduct of military affairs spurred by the confluence of organizational change with new and existing technologies and concepts of operations, the RMA has long been a controversial analytical construct. This thesis accepts the premise that the history of warfare can be interpreted as a series of RMAs. It explores the complex and powerful influence of American strategic culture and the organizational culture of the U.S. Army on the organizational, doctrinal, technology, funding and other factors vital to the realization of an RMA. The study compares the influence of U.S. strategic and Army organizational culture on the RMA during the interwar period (1919-1941) and the contemporary period (since the 2011 withdrawal of U.S. combat forces from Iraq) to highlight similarities and differences that U.S. military and civilian leaders can learn from to change the paradigm of military affairs in America's favor.This compilation includes a reproduction of the 2019 Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community. I. INTRODUCTION * A. RESEARCH INQUIRY * B. RESEARCH CHALLENGES * C. LITERATURE REVIEW * 1. Strategic Culture * a. The First Generation of Literature on Strategic Culture * b. The Second Generation of Literature on Strategic Culture * c. The Third Generation of Literature on Strategic Culture * 2. Organizational Culture * a. Approaches to Defining Organizational Culture * b. Approaches to Studying Culture * D. U.S. SECURITY STRATEGY AND U.S. ARMY TRANSFORMATION * 1. The Interwar Period * a. Strategy * b. U.S. Army Transformation * 2. Contemporary Period since the Iraq War * a. Strategy * b. U.S. Army Transformation * E. METHODS AND SOURCES * F. THESIS ORGANIZATION * II. INFLUENCE OF INTERWAR CULTURE ON THE REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS * A. STRATEGIC CULTURE * 1. Interwar Era U.S. Politics, Defense Policy and the RMA * 2. The American Way of War and the RMA (Interwar Period) * 3. Force and Diplomacy in U.S. Foreign Policy and the RMA * 4. The National Cognitive Style and the RMA (Interwar Era) * B. U.S. ARMY CULTURE AND THE RMA IN THE INTERWAR PERIOD * 1. Army Doctrine, Change and the RMA in the Interwar Period * 2. Army Organization, Change and the RMA in the Interwar Period * 3. Army Materiel, Change and the RMA in the Interwar Period * C. CONCLUSION * III. INFLUENCE OF CONTEMPORARY CULTURE ON THE REVOLUTION IN MILITARY AFFAIRS * A. STRATEGIC CULTURE AND THE RMA IN THE CONTEMPORARY PERIOD (2011-PRESENT) * 1. Contemporary U.S. Politics, Defense Policy and the RMA * 2. The American Way of War, and the RMA * 3. Force and Diplomacy in U.S. Foreign Policy and the RMA * 4. The National Cognitive Style and the RMA * B. U.S. ARMY CULTURE AND THE RMA IN THE CONTEMPORARY PERIOD * 1. Army Doctrine Change and the RMA in the Contemporary Period * 2. Army Organization, Change and the RMA in the Contemporary Period * 3. Army Materiel, Change and the RMA in the Contemporary Period * C. CONCLUSION * IV. MANAGING CULTURE TO ACHIEVE AN RMA * A. MANAGING STRATEGIC CULTURE TO ACHIEVE AN RMA * 1. U.S. Politics, Defense Policy and the RMA * 2. The American Way of War * 3. Force and Diplomacy in U.S. Foreign Policy and the RMA * 4. The National Cognitive Style and the RMA * B. MANAGING ARMY CULTURE IN PURSUIT OF AN RMA * V. CONCLUSION
Author: Dmitry (Dima) Adamsky
Publisher: Stanford University Press
ISBN: 0804773807
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 368
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book studies the impact of cultural factors on the course of military innovations. One would expect that countries accustomed to similar technologies would undergo analogous changes in their perception of and approach to warfare. However, the intellectual history of the Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) in Russia, the US, and Israel indicates the opposite. The US developed technology and weaponry for about a decade without reconceptualizing the existing paradigm about the nature of warfare. Soviet 'new theory of victory' represented a conceptualization which chronologically preceded technological procurement. Israel was the first to utilize the weaponry on the battlefield, but was the last to develop a conceptual framework that acknowledged its revolutionary implications. Utilizing primary sources that had previously been completely inaccessible, and borrowing methods of analysis from political science, history, anthropology, and cognitive psychology, this book suggests a cultural explanation for this puzzling transformation in warfare. The Culture of Military Innovation offers a systematic, thorough, and unique analytical approach that may well be applicable in other perplexing strategic situations. Though framed in the context of specific historical experience, the insights of this book reveal important implications related to conventional, subconventional, and nonconventional security issues. It is therefore an ideal reference work for practitioners, scholars, teachers, and students of security studies.
Author: Colin S. Gray
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428916210
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 67
Get Book Here
Book Description
"Revolution in Military Affairs" (RMA) was the most widely used, and abused, acronym in the U.S. defense community in the 1990s. Subsequently, "transformation" has superceded it as the preferred term of art. For the better part of two decades, American defense professionals have been excited by the prospect of effecting a revolutionary change in the conduct and character of warfare. In this monograph, Dr. Colin S. Gray provides a critical audit of the great RMA debate and of some actual RMA behavior. He argues that the contexts of warfare are crucially important. Indeed so vital are the contexts that only a military transformation that allows for flexibility and adaptability will meet future strategic demands. Dr. Gray warns against a transformation that is highly potent only in a narrow range of strategic cases. In addition, he advises that the historical record demonstrates clearly that every revolutionary change in warfare eventually is more or less neutralized by antidotes of one kind or another (political, strategic, operational, tactical, and technological). He warns that the military effectiveness of a process of revolutionary change in a "way of war" can only be judged by the test of battle, and possibly not even then, if the terms of combat are very heavily weighted in favor of the United States. On balance, the concept of revolutionary change is found to be quite useful, provided it is employed and applied with some reservations and in a manner that allows for flexibility and adaptability. Above all else, the monograph insists, the contexts of warfare, especially the political, determine how effective a transforming military establishment will be.
Author: James G. Pierce
Publisher: Strategic Studies Institute
ISBN: 1584874597
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 79
Get Book Here
Book Description
Introduction -- Organizational culture -- Importance of organizational culture analysis -- An overview of professional organizations --Purpose of the present study -- Brief discussion of the concepts of organizational culture and professionalism -- Organizational culture -- Professionalism and professional development -- Methodology -- An overview of the Competing Values Framework (CVF) model -- Origins of the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) -- An overview of the Management Skills Assessment Instrument (MSAI) -- Methodology of the study -- Findings and analysis -- Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) : findings and analysis -- Final analysis -- Implications -- Overview -- Implications for the army profession
Author: James G. Pierce
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781461176794
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 168
Get Book Here
Book Description
Organization theory hypothesizes that an organization's culture enables its members to work through the basic problems of survival in, and adaptation to, the external environment. Organizational culture also guides the organization's development and maintenance of internal processes and procedures that perpetuate adaptability and promote continued existence. Consequently, organizational culture has considerable impact on an organization's behavior at any given time, particularly on organizational effectiveness. However, little literature and even less data discuss the impact of organizational culture within military organizations and, more importantly, the impact that organizational culture may have on the development of an organization's leaders.In the present study, Dr. Pierce postulates that the ability of a professional organization to develop future leaders in a manner that perpetuates readiness to cope with future environmental and internal uncertainty depends on organizational culture. Specifically, the purpose of his study is to explore the relationship between the Army's organizational culture and professional development. He examines the degree of congruence between the Army's organizational culture and the leadership and managerial skills of its officer corps senior leaders. He uses data from a representative sample of such leaders while they were students at the Army War College, Classes of 2003 and 2004.At the macro level the results of his research strongly suggest a significant lack of congruence between the U.S. Army's organizational culture and the results of its professional development programs for its future strategic leaders. He bases his conclusion on iv empirical data that indicate that the future strategic leaders of the Army believe that they operate on a day-to-day basis in an organization whose culture is characterized by:* an overarching desire for stability and control,* formal rules and policies,* coordination and efficiency,* goal and results oriented, and* hard-driving competitiveness.However, sharply highlighting a pronounced lack of congruence between what they believe the Army's culture to be and what it should be (based on their development as future strategic leaders), the respondents also indicated that the Army's culture should be that of a profession, which emphasizes:* flexibility and discretion,* participation,* human resource development,* innovation and creativity,* risk-taking,* long-term emphasis on professional growth, and* the acquisition of new professional knowledge and skills.Clearly, the second set of cultural values and behaviors are much better aligned with the current and future demands of the Army's external strategic environment. Further, almost by definition, these 533 officers represent the future leaders of the Army. That is why their collective perceptions of the Army's professional culture and of their own managerial and leadership skills are of such significance to the Army.
Author: Dima P. Adamsky
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Colin S. Gray
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781461185499
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Get Book Here
Book Description
Since 1993 at the latest, when Andrew W. Marshall and his Office of Net Assessment in the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) introduced into public debate the concept of a Revolution in Military affairs (RMA), the idea of revolutionary change in warfare has gripped the official U.S. strategic imagination. All such master notions, or meta narratives, have lengthy antecedents. The provenance of RMA can be traced in the use of laser-guided bombs in Vietnam; in the 1970s "Assault Breaker" project to develop rocket-delivered smart bomblets to target Soviet armor far behind the front; in Soviet speculation about a Military-Technical Revolution (MTR) and the feasibility of "reconnaissance-strike complexes"; in the Discriminate Deterrence reports of the late 1980s (sponsored by then Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Dr. Fred Ikle, and inspired by Dr. Albert Wohlstetter); by the dramatic effects of stealth and precision in the Gulf War of 1991; and, "off piste" as it were, by a rising argument among academic historians of early-modern Europe. U.S. debate evolved into official commitment. RMA was to be realized as transformation or, for a scarcely less ambitious expression, as revolutionary change in the way American forces would fight. The fascination with revolutionary change persisted through the 1990s, survived, indeed was given "gravity assists" by the newly mandated Quadrennial Defense Reviews (QDRs), by a change in administration in 2001, and was scarcely dented as the dominant defense concept by September 11, 2001 (9/11). Truly it seems to be a big idea for all seasons: for the no name post-Cold War decade, now for the Age of Terror, and prospectively for whatever the decades ahead will bring. This monograph provides an audit, a not-unfriendly critical review, of the concept of revolutionary military change. It offers a review of what those who theorize about, and those who are committed by policy to execute, such a revolution ought to know about their subject. As the subtitle of the analysis announces, the leading edge of the argument is the potency, indeed the sovereign importance, of warfare's contexts. The monograph strives to clarify the confusion over definitions. It points out that the concept of RMA, though less so the even grander idea of military revolution (MR), is eminently and irreducibly contestable. The RMA debate has provided a happy hunting ground for academic historians to wage protracted internecine combat. All definitions of RMA present problems, a fact which is of some practical consequence for a U.S. military now firmly taking what is intended to be a revolutionary path. This author prefers a truly minimalist definition: an RMA is a radical change in the conduct and character of war. The more detail one adds to the definition, the more hostages are offered to reasonable objection. The first of the three major sections poses and answers the most basic of questions, the ones that really matter most, about revolutionary change in warfare. It asks: Does the RMA concept make sense? Is it useful? Does it much matter? Is not military change more a product of evolution than revolution? Are not continuities at least as important as changes in their relative contribution to military effectiveness? And, is revolutionary change the high road to victory? By and large, though not without some rough handling, the RMA concept, the notion of transformation, or simply the descriptive idea of revolutionary change, survive the ordeal of question and answer.
Author: Lawrence Freedman
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1136058281
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 101
Get Book Here
Book Description
Rapid developments in information technology and precision weaponry are said to herald a 'revolution in military affairs' (RMA), making possible quick and decisive victories with minimal casualties and collateral damage. But has such a revolution taken place? The issues that drive conflict will persist, and many of the technical advances associated with the RMA will not necessarily produce a transformation in the nature of warfare. The end of the Cold War has highlighted another revolution one in political affairs. Major powers appear less likely to go to war with one another than they are to intervene in conflicts involving weak states, with potential opponents including militia groups, drug cartels and terrorists. RMA technology may be less suited to conflicts such as these. If the cumulative effect of these changes has produced a revolution, it is a revolution in strategic, as much as military, affairs. This paper argues that: the RMA is the practical expression of a 'Western Way of Warfare', the key features of which are: professional armed forces; intolerance of casualties; and intolerance of collateral damage the key technological and conceptual components of the RMA were in place by the early 1970s. The trend has therefore been evolutionary, rather than revolutionary. The significant difference is in the new political setting of the end of the Cold War, and the revolution in perceptions of Western particularly US conventional military strength brought about by the Gulf War of 1991 the Gulf conflict could mark the start of a true 'revolution' if future battles offer similar opportunities to exploit the RMA's technology. However, since the US and its allies appear unbeatable when fighting on their own terms, future opponents will fight differently the West will therefore face opponents who will follow strategies that contradict the Western Way of Warfare. They will avoid pitched battles, will exploit the West's reluctance to inflict civilian suffering, and will target their opponent's domestic political base, as much as its forward troops. The problem for the West is not how to prevail, but how to do so in an acceptable manner. The more warfare becomes entwined with civilian activity, the more difficult it is to respond with the type of decisive and overwhelming military means embodied in the RMA. The RMA does not create a situation in which information is the only commodity at stake, and so does not offer the prospect of a 'virtual war'. The new circumstances and capabilities do not prescribe one strategy, but extend the range of strategies available. The issue underlying the RMA is the ability of Western countries, in particular the US, to follow a line geared to their own interests and capabilities.
Author: Lawrence Grinter
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781478361886
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 288
Get Book Here
Book Description
This is a book about strategy and war fighting. It contains 11 essays which examine topics such as military operations against a well-armed rogue state, the potential of parallel warfare strategy for different kinds of states, the revolutionary potential of information warfare, the lethal possibilities of biological warfare and the elements of an ongoing revolution in military affairs. The purpose of the book is to focus attention on the operational problems, enemy strategies and threat that will confront U.S. national security decision makers in the twenty-first century.
Author: Strategic Studies Institute
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781502929594
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Get Book Here
Book Description
Since 1993 at the latest, when Andrew W. Marshall and his Office of Net Assessment in the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) introduced into public debate the concept of a Revolution in Military affairs (RMA), the idea of revolutionary change in warfare has gripped the official U.S. strategic imagination. All such master notions, or meta narratives, have lengthy antecedents. The provenance of RMA can be traced in the use of laser-guided bombs in Vietnam; in the 1970s “Assault Breaker” project to develop rocket delivered smart bomb lets to target Soviet armor far behind the front; in Soviet speculation about a Military-Technical Revolution (MTR) and the feasibility of “reconnaissance-strike complexes”; in the Discriminate Deterrence reports of the late 1980s (sponsored by then Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Dr. Fred Ikle, and inspired by Dr. Albert Wohlstetter); by the dramatic effects of stealth and precision in the Gulf War of 1991; and, “off piste” as it were, by a rising argument among academic historians of early-modern Europe. U.S. debate evolved into official commitment. RMA was to be realized as transformation or, for a scarcely less ambitious expression, as revolutionary change in the way American forces would fight. The fascination with revolutionary change persisted through the 1990s, survived, indeed was given “gravity assists” by the newly mandated Quadrennial Defense Reviews (QDRs), by a change in administration in 2001, and was scarcely dented as the dominant defense concept by September 11, 2001 (9/11). Truly it seems to be a big idea for all seasons: for the no-name post-Cold War decade, now for the Age of Terror, and prospectively for whatever the decades ahead will bring. This study provides an audit, a not-unfriendly critical review, of the concept of revolutionary military change. It offers a review of what those who theorize about, and those who are committed by policy to execute, such a revolution ought to know about their subject. As the subtitle of the analysis announces, the leading edge of the argument is the potency, indeed the sovereign importance, of warfare's contexts.
