The Future of Centralized Control for Airpower PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Future of Centralized Control for Airpower PDF full book. Access full book title The Future of Centralized Control for Airpower by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Air Force Basic Doctrine Document 1 lists seven tenets, or "fundamental guiding truths," for airpower employment. The first of these is centralized control and decentralized execution. This tenet dictates that "air and space power must be controlled by an airman who maintains a broad strategic and/or theater perspective in prioritizing the use of limited air and space assets to attain the objectives of all U.S. forces in any contingency across the range of operations." This paper addresses the following questions regarding the information revolution's impact on this tenet: How does this impact the principle of centralized command and decentralized execution? Is this paradigm outmoded? Do we want or need the command and decision authority pushed down to the tactical unit level? Alternatively, will exceptionally talented and capable systems invite higher authority micro-management of tactical actions? How might such possible "decision up-creep" be mitigated? The information revolution, combined with either the political imperatives associated with limited conflicts or the threat posed by an emergent "niche competitor," will tend to lead U.S. airpower further away from the concept of centralized control and decentralized execution. This should be a conscious decision, however. As "a statement of officially sanctioned beliefs and warfighting principles that describe and guide the proper use of ... forces in military operations EMPHASIS ADDED," doctrine and operational art are closely linked. Therefore, operational art should be an explicit factor in the decision. The author recommends several elements of operational leadership that the operational commander should explicitly consider in making such a decision.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Air Force Basic Doctrine Document 1 lists seven tenets, or "fundamental guiding truths," for airpower employment. The first of these is centralized control and decentralized execution. This tenet dictates that "air and space power must be controlled by an airman who maintains a broad strategic and/or theater perspective in prioritizing the use of limited air and space assets to attain the objectives of all U.S. forces in any contingency across the range of operations." This paper addresses the following questions regarding the information revolution's impact on this tenet: How does this impact the principle of centralized command and decentralized execution? Is this paradigm outmoded? Do we want or need the command and decision authority pushed down to the tactical unit level? Alternatively, will exceptionally talented and capable systems invite higher authority micro-management of tactical actions? How might such possible "decision up-creep" be mitigated? The information revolution, combined with either the political imperatives associated with limited conflicts or the threat posed by an emergent "niche competitor," will tend to lead U.S. airpower further away from the concept of centralized control and decentralized execution. This should be a conscious decision, however. As "a statement of officially sanctioned beliefs and warfighting principles that describe and guide the proper use of ... forces in military operations EMPHASIS ADDED," doctrine and operational art are closely linked. Therefore, operational art should be an explicit factor in the decision. The author recommends several elements of operational leadership that the operational commander should explicitly consider in making such a decision.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Get Book Here
Book Description
Communications technology has enabled the U.S. military to move data rapidly around the globe and provide commanders with the ability to monitor and maintain nearly constant communication with subordinates. However, this capability has the potential to tempt them to over-centralize control of operations, which can in turn erode the trust, initiative, and creativity of tactical-level decision makers. Each service's doctrine recognizes this potential, yet the Air Force alone insists on a tenet of "centralized control." In a complex environment where adaptive adversaries will adopt asymmetric methods to circumvent U.S. strengths, communication nodes and C2 systems may become critical vulnerabilities. The Air Force must recognize the need to embrace a degree of decentralized control and resource aircrews with the ability to directly gather information needed to make decisions. MASINT may inspire opportunities to field advanced sensors on combat aircraft, but more importantly, these new tactical sensors must be integrated into the broader ISR system and become so common that future Airman no longer refer to the implementation of such sensors as "Non-Traditional" ISR. These sensors could enable tactical-level decision makers to exploit the distributed nature of air operations and work towards the strategic ends of a centralized command, in an environment where adversaries will likely attempt to degrade U.S. information superiority.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 61
Get Book Here
Book Description
The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the role of centralized execution in air power doctrine. However, research showed that the problem was much deeper than merely a shift toward centralized execution. The problem is in the use of the term centralized execution itself. This term is not clearly defined in doctrine and its sister term, decentralized execution, is incorrectly defined. These terms should really describe the level of control exercised by senior leaders over tactical operations. True centralized execution using technology to literally execute tactical events from afar presents its own set of problems. Doctrine needs to be clarified to remove this confusion. This discussion over what some would refer to as simple semantics is grounded in the strategic objectives sought when employing air power. The Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC) is responsible for employing air power to achieve strategic effectiveness. Therefore, the trend toward close control (incorrectly referred to as centralized execution) stems from the desire and ability to control the strategic effects created by tactical operations. Air Force leaders seem to fully understand this, but tactical operators do not. Both doctrine and training emphasize tactical efficiency, duping war fighters into believing that tactical efficiency is critical to strategic effectiveness. In reality, history proves that often this is not the case. My research demonstrates that the Air Force needs to abandon the terminology in its master tenet of air power. Future JFACCs will determine the appropriate level of control required in their situation, and operators should not be surprised if the JFACC chooses close control. It is time for the Air Force to move beyond centralized control and decentralized execution to a deeper understanding of the contextual factors leading senior leaders to actively involve themselves into tactical operations.
Author: Gregory S. Marzolf
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air power
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Get Book Here
Book Description
"Recent experiences in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom have highlighted the need for adaptable and tailorable airpower command and control (C2) systems that can better serve the joint force across the entire range of operations. Though the Air Force has done a good job adapting the existing C2 system to the task, at times using a variety of control frameworks, it has not yet looked at future C2 requirements holistically in order to create a "toolbox of capabilities" that avoids the need for poorly optimized piece-meal or work-around solutions. Simply stated, as battlefield dynamics change and technology moves forward, air employment and its associated C2 systems must also change to remain relevant. The inattention has resulted in obsolete elements of the Theater Air Command System, Air Operations Centers funded at 50 percent (or less), poor command relationships, and an unwieldy C2 structure that is difficult to tailor for today's fight. Here, decentralized ground operations are bypassing operational-level planning processes. This has created a large seam between air planning (that occurs centrally at the AOC, far removed from the battlefield) and ground planning that occurs at low-level tactical units (directly on the battlefield). The upshot is a perception that the Air Force is not there, or not fully committed to the joint fight. To help solve these problems, this study offers insights into the world of C2 by explaining that there are no "one size fits all" C2 systems. It stresses the importance of human relationships to build trust. It emphasizes the benefits of hierarchal over flat structures. And, it offers some suggestions (such as using mission-type orders) to help overcome bandwidth limitations and C2 vulnerabilities in order to create a more survivable C2 system. After this, the paper suggests that the Air Force's current "centralized control, decentralized execution" paradigm does not adequately represent airpower employment, and because of this, it redefines and offers a new C2 paradigm, "centralized command, adaptive control, decentralized execution." This paradigm better represents the future evolution and totality of airpower employment. In the end, the following suggestions are offered to make future airpower C2 better and more relevant. They include: 1) Adopt "Centralized Command, Adaptive Control, Decentralized Execution" as the AF's paradigm for airpower employment. 2) Develop more flexible/adaptable C2 solutions that provide the JFACC with a "toolbox of capabilities;" this not only includes fixing TACS, but also having structures/C2 elements that provide sufficient depth of control. 3) Consider adopting MTO as an over-arching C2 philosophy for AF base-line training. 4) Implement an Air Warfare Training Strategy. 5) Build strong habitual command relationships by avoiding overly flat C2 structures that increase span of control, increasing centralized decision-making, and allowing subordinates to drift. 6) Reduce CENTCOM's CFACC duties so they can focus exclusively on warfighting, not on other service-related matters that detract from the joint mission. 7) Build a deployable (or partly deployable) AOC capability. 8) Extend appropriate AF deployments to one-year. 9) Ensure forces train together before deploying into combat. And, 10) build a career track to help embolden AF warfighting culture."--Abstract from web site.
Author: U S Military
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781089375821
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 82
Get Book Here
Book Description
Two decades of conflict in the Middle East have shaped the USAF's cultural habits for a specific type of enemy: one who has offered minimal opposition to air, space, and cyber supremacy. The nature of these conflicts has encouraged a creeping centralization of command and control (C2). This shift has been out of convenience. Emerging peer competitors signal the need to decentralize out of necessity. This paper argues that unless the USAF leads a doctrinal shift to centralized command, adaptive control, and decentralized execution, it will suffer increasing paralysis due to A2/AD lines of operation specifically designed to exploit today's centralized control paradigm. In the near future, technological peers will be focused on hitting the USAF where it hurts most. The A2/AD focus on C2 denial portends a formidable challenge to U.S. C2. These changes in the character of war, coupled with a shrinking U.S. defense budget will require adaptive control. USAF culture is well suited for centralization, but a rebalance toward decentralization will be necessary to employ this model. In addition to bolstering our communication and network security, the USAF should use the C2 concepts presented in this paper to commit to the mission command philosophy instead of maintaining the hope that a technophile, brute-force network defense will hold against a technological peer. Hope is not a course of action.This compilation includes a reproduction of the 2019 Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community.Airpower's Master Tenant and Anti-Access/Area Denial: Hope is Not a Course of Action * 1. Introduction * 2. Elemental Determinants of Centralization/Decentralization Balance * 3. Battle Networks and Their Impact on Control in Air Defense * 4. A Search For Elemental Determinants of the Centralization/Decentralization Balance * 5. Relationships of the Elemental Determinants and Impact on Adaptive Control * 6. Future Peer in Asia-Pacific Forces Decentralized Control * 7. Recommendations * 8. ConclusionLike the French military which relied upon climbing out of the trenches at Verdun to win World War One and hoped that the next war would be carried out the same at the Maginot Line, the American military which won a victory in the Gulf War also hopes to continue the "Desert Storm" type addiction during the 21st century... It was little imagined that the blind spot in the visual field of the Americans would just appear [as blind faith in technology to solve all political problems].
Author: Michael W. Kometer
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781429495028
Category : Air warfare
Languages : en
Pages : 335
Get Book Here
Book Description
This work examines whether centralized control and decentralized execution4 is a valid doctrinal tenet, given the technological advances in the information age. Fascinating scenarios from recent operations, set in the context of a 3complex air operations system, show the dilemmas presented by participants2 increased access to information--and the resulting consequences of their decisions. With the uncertainty of war and the blending of diverse organizations, the author illustrates that commanders must balance empowerment with accountability by developing depth in command relationships among their subordinates.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 29
Get Book Here
Book Description
This monograph addresses the continued relevance of airpower's master tenet in light of advances in technology. The purpose of this monograph is to examine the doctrinal assumptions used to justify centralized control with decentralized execution. Current Air Force doctrine assumes that this model of employment allows commanders to achieve effective span of control and to foster disciplined initiative, situational responsiveness, and tactical flexibility. Each of these assertions is explored relative to technological advances in the employment of air and space power and the current trend toward centralized execution. Based on this analysis, this monograph concludes that the location of sufficient understanding of the commander's intent along the chain of command from the JFACC to the airborne asset determines the appropriate level of centralized execution. Successful future leaders will adapt the degree of centralized execution in their command and control model to fit their circumstances.
Author: Clint Hinote
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781478296508
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 90
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Air Force's master tenet of centralized control, decentralized execution is in danger of becoming dogma. Airmen have difficulty communicating the meaning of this phrase in a joint setting. This is partially due to our limited understanding of its history and the imprecise meaning of the words involved. Furthermore, the irregular conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq (and the ongoing service debates in the Pacific) have demonstrated the need for a deeper understanding of this master tenet to advocate effectively for airpower solutions. We must get this right, as it is critical to maximizing airpower's potential. Getting it right, however, requires moving beyond sound bites and bumper stickers.
Author: Patrick J. Sheets
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air power
Languages : en
Pages : 60
Get Book Here
Book Description
The advent of technological advancements in computers and communications capability has resulted in a frightening tendency to centralize execution of military operations. This thesis will focus on command and control (C2) as an operation and show that the USAF command and control tenet of "centralized control-decentralized execution," is vital to the success of current and future command and control employment concepts which should drive system development. To realize the significance of the USAF C2 tenet of "centralized control-decentralized execution," one must understand how C2 is executed, in contingency theaters of operation. The best way to view the execution of C2 is to start with the effect desired within the battlespace and work backwards. As you read this thesis, it is important to focus on this distinction. Visualizing command and control of aerospace power this way, will highlight the importance of tactics, techniques and procedures, and their relationship to decentralized execution resulting from centralized control. The historic success of air and space power, since its first use as a military tool, has centered on the evolution of "centralized control and decentralized execution." With the onslaught of technological advances in communications and real-time battle space situational awareness, the natural tendency is to make tactical decisions at the operational level. This evolution has been exasperated by the lack of integration of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance data at the tactical level of execution. Centralizing execution or even over controlling the execution of the master aerospace attack plan (MAAP) from the operational level is detrimental to initiative, ingenuity, flexibility and autonomy, which are the key attributes enabling the successful employment of aerospace power.
Author: Daniel F. Baltrusaitis
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Command and control systems
Languages : en
Pages : 69
Get Book Here
Book Description
