The Epistemology of Disagreement PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Epistemology of Disagreement PDF full book. Access full book title The Epistemology of Disagreement by David Christensen. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: David Christensen
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199698376
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
Languages : en
Pages : 281
Get Book Here
Book Description
This is a collective study of the epistemic significance of disagreement: 12 contributors explore rival responses to the problems that it raises for philosophy. They develop our understanding of epistemic phenomena that are central to any thoughtful engagement with others' beliefs.
Author: David Christensen
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199698376
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
Languages : en
Pages : 281
Get Book Here
Book Description
This is a collective study of the epistemic significance of disagreement: 12 contributors explore rival responses to the problems that it raises for philosophy. They develop our understanding of epistemic phenomena that are central to any thoughtful engagement with others' beliefs.
Author: J. Matheson
Publisher: Springer
ISBN: 1137400900
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 325
Get Book Here
Book Description
Discovering someone disagrees with you is a common occurrence. The question of epistemic significance of disagreement concerns how discovering that another disagrees with you affects the rationality of your beliefs on that topic. This book examines the answers that have been proposed to this question, and presents and defends its own answer.
Author: Fernando Broncano-Berrocal
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 9780367652647
Category : Group decision making
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group disagreement across a range of political, religious, social, and scientific issues.
Author: John Pittard
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 0190051817
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 361
Get Book Here
Book Description
Every known religious or explicitly irreligious outlook is contested by large contingents of informed and reasonable people. Many philosophers have argued that reflection on this fact should lead us to abandon confident religious or irreligious belief and to embrace religious skepticism. John Pittard critically assesses the case for such disagreement-motivated religious skepticism. While the book focuses on religious disagreement, it makes a number of significant contributions to the more general discussion of the rational significance of disagreement as well.
Author: Kirk Lougheed
Publisher: Springer Nature
ISBN: 3030345033
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 134
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book presents an original discussion and analysis of epistemic peer disagreement. It reviews a wide range of cases from the literature, and extends the definition of epistemic peerhood with respect to the current one, to account for the actual variability found in real-world examples. The book offers a number of arguments supporting the variability in the nature and in the range of disagreements, and outlines the main benefits of disagreement among peers i.e. what the author calls the benefits to inquiry argument.
Author: Casey Rebecca Johnson
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1351721569
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 325
Get Book Here
Book Description
Disagreement is, for better or worse, pervasive in our society. Not only do we form beliefs that differ from those around us, but increasingly we have platforms and opportunities to voice those disagreements and make them public. In light of the public nature of many of our most important disagreements, a key question emerges: How does public disagreement affect what we know? This volume collects original essays from a number of prominent scholars—including Catherine Elgin, Sanford Goldberg, Jennifer Lackey, Michael Patrick Lynch, and Duncan Pritchard, among others—to address this question in its diverse forms. The book is organized by thematic sections, in which individual chapters address the epistemic, ethical, and political dimensions of dissent. The individual contributions address important issues such as the value of disagreement, the nature of conversational disagreement, when dissent is epistemically rational, when one is obligated to voice disagreement or to object, the relation of silence and resistance to dissent, and when political dissent is justified. Voicing Dissent offers a new approach to the study of disagreement that will appeal to social epistemologists and ethicists interested in this growing area of epistemology.
Author: Bryan Frances
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 0745685234
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 171
Get Book Here
Book Description
Regardless of who you are or how you live your life, you disagree with millions of people on an enormous number of topics from politics, religion and morality to sport, culture and art. Unless you are delusional, you are aware that a great many of the people who disagree with you are just as smart and thoughtful as you are - in fact, you know that often they are smarter and more informed. But believing someone to be cleverer or more knowledgeable about a particular topic usually won’t change your mind. Should it? This book is devoted to exploring this quandary - what should we do when we encounter disagreement, particularly when we believe someone is more of an authority on a subject than we are? The question is of enormous importance, both in the public arena and in our personal lives. Disagreement over marriages, beliefs, friendships and more causes immense personal strife. People with political power disagree about how to spend enormous amounts of money, about what laws to pass, or about wars to fight. If only we were better able to resolve our disagreements, we would probably save millions of lives and prevent millions of others from living in poverty. The first full-length text-book on this philosophical topic, Disagreement provides students with the tools they need to understand the burgeoning academic literature and its (often conflicting) perspectives. Including case studies, sample questions and chapter summaries, this engaging and accessible book is the perfect starting point for students and anyone interested in thinking about the possibilities and problems of this fundamental philosophical debate.
Author: Richard Feldman
Publisher: OUP Oxford
ISBN: 9780199226085
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Disagreement is common: even informed, intelligent, and generally reasonable people often come to different conclusions when confronted with what seems to be the same evidence. Can the competing conclusions be reasonable? If not, what can we reasonably think about the situation? This is the first book on the epistemology of disagreement.
Author: Herman Cappelen
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199668779
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 769
Get Book Here
Book Description
This is the most comprehensive book ever published on philosophical methodology. A team of thirty-eight of the world's leading philosophers present original essays on various aspects of how philosophy should be and is done. The first part is devoted to broad traditions and approaches to philosophical methodology (including logical empiricism, phenomenology, and ordinary language philosophy). The entries in the second part address topics in philosophical methodology, such as intuitions, conceptual analysis, and transcendental arguments. The third part of the book is devoted to essays about the interconnections between philosophy and neighbouring fields, including those of mathematics, psychology, literature and film, and neuroscience.
Author: Diego E. Machuca
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 0415532833
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 314
Get Book Here
Book Description
The thirteen essays in this volume explore for the first time the possible skeptical implications of disagreement in different areas and from different perspectives, with an emphasis in the current debate about the epistemic significance of disagreement. They represent a new contribution to the study of the connection between disagreement and skepticism in epistemology, metaethics, ancient philosophy, and metaphilosophy.
