Subsequent Course Pass Rates in Modularized Developmental Mathematics Courses in Select Community Colleges in North Carolina PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Subsequent Course Pass Rates in Modularized Developmental Mathematics Courses in Select Community Colleges in North Carolina PDF full book. Access full book title Subsequent Course Pass Rates in Modularized Developmental Mathematics Courses in Select Community Colleges in North Carolina by Tammy Jane Bishop. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Tammy Jane Bishop
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Community colleges
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Throughout the past decade the structure of developmental education courses and teaching methods has been changing in order to try and improve success rates of students in developmental education courses and beyond. Course redesigns have taken place throughout the country. The modularized, mastery redesign for developmental mathematics of the North Carolina Community College System was examined in this study. The purpose of this study was to compare the subsequent gateway course success rates of the pre- and post-redesign courses, as well as compare rates of the post-redesign courses based on the delivery method used. Delivery methods compared were teacher-centered, student-centered, and computer-centered. Data showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the subsequent gateway course success rates based on the design of the course. However, data did show that the student-centered and computer-centered delivery methods, which both use indirect instruction, have a statistically significant difference in subsequent gateway course success rates when compared to teacher-centered instruction. The electronic version of this dissertation is accessible from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11875/2327
Author: Tammy Jane Bishop
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Community colleges
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Throughout the past decade the structure of developmental education courses and teaching methods has been changing in order to try and improve success rates of students in developmental education courses and beyond. Course redesigns have taken place throughout the country. The modularized, mastery redesign for developmental mathematics of the North Carolina Community College System was examined in this study. The purpose of this study was to compare the subsequent gateway course success rates of the pre- and post-redesign courses, as well as compare rates of the post-redesign courses based on the delivery method used. Delivery methods compared were teacher-centered, student-centered, and computer-centered. Data showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the subsequent gateway course success rates based on the design of the course. However, data did show that the student-centered and computer-centered delivery methods, which both use indirect instruction, have a statistically significant difference in subsequent gateway course success rates when compared to teacher-centered instruction. The electronic version of this dissertation is accessible from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11875/2327
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781133873945
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 147
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kristina Corey Legge
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 98
Get Book Here
Book Description
The number of students entering the community college in need of developmental math has not changed, remaining at a steady 60% over the past seven years. This study compared the success rate of Mandatory Supplemental Instruction (MSI) sessions within four sections of a developmental math course compared with the success rates of students enrolled in both the Traditional Classroom setting and the Individualized format at Suburban Community College (SCC) during the Fall 2009 semester. These MSI format courses were compared with both the Individualized format of MAT 060 and the Traditional Classroom format of the same course. The students included in these sections were a combination of students who were: 1) suggested by advisors to enroll in this developmental math course after receiving a low score on the college's Accuplacer placement test for algebra or continuing the progression of developmental math from the lower level arithmetic class; 2) mandated to attend MSI after successful completion of the Jump Start Math Program, or 3) self-selected into the MSI group anticipating the need for additional help in the course. The two primary data sets available for this study are student math final grades and student participation/attendance records. Secondary sets of data include informal focus group notes, final exam scores, student attendance records for both class lectures and MSI sessions, and Supplemental Instruction Leader anecdotal records. The findings of this study conclude that success rates of students enrolled in the MSI sections of developmental math do not differ significantly from those enrolled in the Traditional Classroom format of developmental math; however, both groups did differ significantly from the Individualized format of developmental math, in that the students enrolled in the Individualized format succeeded at a lesser rate and withdrew at a greater rate than their MSI or Traditional Classroom counterparts. This study also concluded that female, full-time students succeeded at a greater rate across the board, which is consistent with the literature. These findings were significant for a number of reasons. Although the difference between the treatment group and the Traditional Classroom group was not significant, there are a variety of reasons at the program level as to why this may have been so and there are many future constructs that SCC can put in place to strengthen and reassess the MSI program. Although this study was focused on the MSI treatment, the data revealed a greater issue existing in the Individualized format of developmental math at SCC. Future considerations can be made in this particular delivery method to improve success rates of students involved in this program. Future research on MSI in the form of persistence and retention rates, graduation rates, transfer rates, subsequent math course grades and success in other college-level classes can be explored to provide the MSI program with more data to determine if particular groups of students are benefiting from this format.
Author: Brenda Catherine Frame
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic dissertations
Languages : en
Pages : 127
Get Book Here
Book Description
Poor success rates of developmental mathematics courses at community colleges have currently received nationwide attention. Efforts to remedy the situation include complete course redesigns and intervention strategies. A recent intervention strategy in use is the implementation of success courses that are aimed at changing the learning perspectives of developmental students. The purpose of this mixed-method comparative study was to closely examine this strategy as it relates specifically to students studying developmental mathematics at the lowest level at one community college. Students taking the lowest level developmental mathematics course at the participating community college were designated into one of two groups: those taking mathematics with the success course and those taking mathematics without a success course. The study explored students' perceptions and belief structures regarding the study of developmental mathematics and focused on identifying any changes in student belief structures over the course of one semester. Descriptive statistics regarding grade achievement of the population with the student success course provide insight into the possible benefits of the success course for developmental mathematics students. Participants in the study, starting out in the lowest mathematics course offered at the community college, need more mathematics in order to obtain a degree or certificate from the college. Rate of registration for the subsequent mathematics courses were also analyzed in the study. Findings showed that the offering of a success course to students who are at-risk in developmental mathematics has made some improvements in the percentage of students who were able to satisfactorily complete the first level developmental mathematics course at one community college. It also showed that for students who did not pass the success course, there was a nearly one-to-one relationship with unsuccessful completion of a low-level mathematics course. Qualitative data helps explain how the two groups were quite different and also helps to explain findings.
Author: John Patrick Bradley (Jr.)
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780355251531
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 243
Get Book Here
Book Description
Developmental mathematics pass rates at Delaware Technical Community College (DTCC) have remained the same or decreased for a number of years despite two different math curriculum redesigns. They hover around 50 percent or below at each campus, even after the implementation of a second redesign this past Fall 2016 semester. The first redesign switched from a face-to-face style of developmental math instruction to an Emporium model. After a lack of significant improvements in pass rates, the math courses were redesigned again. ☐ To further investigate the problem of low developmental math pass rates at DTCC, several strategies were employed. A literature review was conducted regarding developmental education, andragogy, high school tracking, alternative models of developmental course redesign, and the corequisite model of instruction. Furthermore, surveys of faculty and students at DTCC were conducted to determine the perception of developmental math education at DTCC, to determine perceived barriers from both faculty and students for low student pass rates, and to gauge the support for the implementation of a corequisite model of developmental math instruction. Some faculty did not believe a redesign was necessary, while others did. Students offered strong support for developmental math course redesign. Both faculty and students identified several common perceived barriers that they believe result in lower pass rates for students in these math classes. ☐ In addition, interviews were conducted at three different institutions that redesigned their developmental course curriculum. The purpose was to discover how the institutions targeted the courses for redesign, to find the rationale for choosing the corequisite model, and to identify recommendations they had for institutions who want to redesign their developmental math curriculum. Two redesign leaders at two four-year public colleges were interviewed along with a redesign leader from a community college in the area. The results of these interviews indicated that while redesigning the developmental math curriculum was difficult in all cases, the results of each corequisite implementation suggested improved pass rates that transcended several major demographics. I used the survey and interview results, coupled with the literature review and feedback from DTCC peers, to design samples of a corequisite math course with a syllabus, schedule of classroom activities, a Blackboard Learning Management system course, and a corequisite advisement sheet for students and academic counselors. Additionally, I outlined a strategic plan for implementing the corequisite model for developmental math courses at DTCC. ☐ Throughout the process of completing the artifacts for this ELP, feedback was solicited, obtained, and incorporated into each artifact from members of this ELP committee. The Dean of Instruction at the Stanton and Wilmington campuses, along with two math instructors, and two math chairs, also provided feedback on the proposed strategic plan. Their feedback enabled both a macro and micro approach to the investigation of the problem, helped craft a potential solution to solve it, and offered final recommendations for implementing a corequisite model of math redesign at DTCC. The final recommendation is that the corequisite model of developmental math instruction be piloted at DTCC beginning with the steps outlined in the ELP proposal and subsequent artifacts.
Author: Deborah Lynn McKay
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Community colleges
Languages : en
Pages : 74
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781133873969
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 146
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781133873938
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 190
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Miles Harris
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Developmental studies programs
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Get Book Here
Book Description
A study was performed to assess the effectiveness of the developmental mathematics program at Youngstown State University. For this study, two cohort groups of developmental mathematics students were selected, and the success rate of both groups in their developmental and subsequent college-level courses was tracked. The results of the cohort study was compared to the success rates found in a population study, to check if the developmental students performed as well in their college-level courses as the population. For every college-level course tracked in this study, there was no statistically significant difference in the passing rate of the cohort groups and the population group.
Author: Cecilia Le
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 20
Get Book Here
Book Description
Nearly 60 percent of incoming community college students are unprepared for college-level work and must take at least one pre-college, "developmental" course, usually in math or English, before enrolling in any credit-bearing classes toward a degree. Within developmental education, students are most likely to need help with mathematics, and students who enter community college needing to take developmental math fare the worst in terms of outcomes making this an issue that deeply affects students. Lack of readiness for college math is as damaging as it is widespread. Students are more likely to fail developmental mathematics than any other course in higher education, according to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Thus, it is not surprising that many students referred to developmental math choose to bypass such courses and services, without knowing the detrimental consequences of this decision on their overall educational goals. This brief looks at three community colleges that have made significant investments in programs to improve student success in developmental math. These colleges are spotlighted for their implementation of the varied approaches to developmental math described above and for their ability to demonstrate outcomes for their students. The community colleges featured in this brief are: (1) Florence-Darlington Technical College in South Carolina; (2) Delaware County Community College in Pennsylvania; and (3) Chaffey College in California. (Contains 4 tables and 11 endnotes.).
