Strategy Use in Unequal Encounters PDF Download

Author: Shoudong Feng
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 336

Get Book Here

Book Description
This dissertation aims to identify the pragmatic communication strategies of Chinese ESL learners in two academic settings, namely, the ESL classroom and the ESL tutorial session. The concept of pragmatic communication strategies originates from the well-researched construct of second language learners' communication strategy, which has long been understood as strategies that address primarily problems and difficulties associated with the use of vocabulary. However, the essential purpose of this study is not how ESL learners solve their linguistic problems but how they negotiate their relationships with native speakers of English with their second languages. This study was a qualitative research effort that involved observation, interviews and questionnaire. Data were collected mainly in an ESL classroom and a language learning center where tutorials are conducted. In both settings there are unequal relationships between the two parties engaged in interaction. In the classroom context, the instructor decided the agenda, materials, topics, methods of teaching, turn of speaking, and finally and probably most importantly the grades. In the tutorial session, the tutors, although not having the same amount of power over the students as the instructor, had good command of the language used in the context, and consequentially represented the dominant values, determined the topics, and determined a variety of other discourse-related issues. Critical discourse analysis was applied to the data. This is a discourse approach that is based on the recognition of the influence of power relations in society on the production of discourse and text. It deals with such issues as class, status, gender, race, hegemony, dictatorship, nationalism, sexism, media control and organizational discourse. The ultimate goal of this theory is to help people become aware of the use of language to exercise power and in many instances victimize the powerless individuals. The findings of this study suggest that these ESL learners adopted various kinds of pragmatic strategies in negotiating their relationship with the instructor and tutors. Facing the powerful party in each context, they choose to (or have to?) adopt certain strategies in order to accomplish their communicative goals, be they long term or short term goals. Clearly the context had an impact on the strategies they used, as some could be found only in one setting while others only in another setting. It is not clear if these participants also adopt the same strategies in their own language and culture, in other words, the influence of the second language on the choice of pragmatic communication strategies needs to be further determined in future studies.