Seismic Behavior, Performance, and Retrofit of Non-ductile Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Seismic Behavior, Performance, and Retrofit of Non-ductile Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures PDF full book. Access full book title Seismic Behavior, Performance, and Retrofit of Non-ductile Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures by Yahya Kurama. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Yahya Kurama
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Reinforced concrete construction
Languages : en
Pages : 67
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Yahya Kurama
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Reinforced concrete construction
Languages : en
Pages : 67
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Chih-Ping Fan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Damping (Mechanics)
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Many reinforced concrete (RC)) frame buildings constructed in the United States during the 1950s through 1970s were designed for gravity loads only using the non-seismic design provisions of the ACI-318 building code and ACI-315 detailing manual. The seismic performance of these RC frame buildings is unsatisfactory with brittle (non-ductile) failure modes that are controlled by poor reinforcing details including reinforcement with inadequate anchorage details, and joints and critical regions with light confinement and inadequate shear reinforcement. In particular, the columns of these non-ductile frame buildings have inadequate strength and ductility. Therefore, these buildings require retrofit to provide good seismic performance.
Author: Elham Moore
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 542
Get Book Here
Book Description
ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Experimental Study of a Non-Ductile Concrete Moment Frame Building Subjected to Biaxial Quasi-Static Seismic Loading by Elham MooreDoctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 2021 Professor John Wright Wallace, Chair The ability of reinforced concrete (RC) columns to continue to deform with reduced capacity depends on the ability of the floor system to redistribute some of the axial load from heavily damaged element to adjacent members to prevent the collapse of the structure when that happens. Physical testing of columns, although does not fully capture the behavior of the building as a system, is the closest approach to simulate behavior of columns that undergo high constant or varying axial forces. That is by choosing boundary conditions that are representative of actual conditions, as accurately as possible. However, physical testing of a building subassembly is a more powerful tool to provide realistic information on the performance level of existing buildings under seismic loads, as well as to better demonstrate the governing failure modes of the system working together, rather than evaluating members individually. Two large-scale beam-column-slab subassemblies were tested under biaxial quasi-static, reversed cyclic loading are discussed in this report. The test specimens are replicas of elements from a non-ductile concrete moment frame building located on the UCLA campus, the Franz Tower (currently named the Pritzker Hall). The reinforced concrete building originally constructed in the late 60s consists of six levels with closely spaced perimeter columns supported on a transfer girder, with two open lower levels supported on a widely spaced column grid. The lateral force resisting system at the upper six levels consists of trapezoidal columns spaced at 4 ft. (1219 mm) on center along the perimeter of the structure, with trapezoidal beams spanning between the columns. Traditional retrofit techniques in accordance with the governing building codes and the University of California Seismic Performance Rating (UCSPC), suggested a high cost retrofit scheme with significant disruption to the architecture of the building. This is believed to be attributed to these main reasons: 1- The governing standard for seismic evaluation and rehabilitation of existing buildings, ASCE/SEI 41-13 Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, herein referred to as ASCE 41-13, was conservative in predicting deformation capacity of building components when subjected to lateral (seismic) loading, especially when the building components fell under the non-conforming criteria, hence underestimating their performance. 2- The cross sections of the frame beams and columns were not rectangular which is the common type of cross section for typical moment frames. As a result, there was an inherent ambiguity in the capability of the non-linear modeling parameter offered by ASCE 41-13 to predict the performance achieved by the moment frames in the Franz Tower. 3- Another uncommon characteristic of this building was the aspect ratio of the moment frames (bay width/story height), which is less than 0.3 (with the beam span of 4 ft. (1219 mm) and column height of about 12. ft 9 in. (3886 mm), while aspect ratios of more than or equal to 1 are more common. Therefore, the beams were rigid and would not be able to sustain a double curvature deformation, as common in the moment frame beams. 4- The repetitive frame system around the perimeter of the building provided a high level of redundancy that was not observed in typical buildings, nor in the test data used to derive the ASCE 41-13 modeling parameters. To evaluate all the issues mentioned above, a detailed physical testing program was designed with an emphasis on obtaining the overall force-deformation backbone curve for the subassembly. In order to use the data obtained from the physical testing, it was imperative to recreate the experimental backbone curve in Perform-3D, by making necessary modifications to the modeling parameters of the building components. These modifications were based on the observed damage at each drift level, and at each building component, and included the plastic deformation capacity of the columns, flexural residual strength of the columns, and shear capacity of the beams. Those modifications were later applied to the Perform-3D model of the actual building in an attempt to assess its actual performance under seismic loading. This study presents the findings of the two biaxial tests conducted on two building subassemblies and reveals that the test specimens sustained damages beyond the Collapse Prevention and Life-Safety limits of ASCE 41-13. The specimens did not lose their gravity load-carrying capacity during the test (even after exceeding 2.5% lateral drift ratio), which also provided for a higher Expected Seismic Level Performance per UCSPR, performance rating III (seismic safety policy compliant). Finally, this study provides a holistic overview on the proposed retrofit program that includes downtime and repair costs in case of a major ground shaking, utilizing the FEMA P-58, Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Methodology which was developed by the Applied Technology Council (ATC) and funded by FEMA. (ATC, 2020) This study includes building assessments per the Seismic Performance Prediction Program (SP3), including analyses per the governing standards, as well as analyses per the experimental test observations. Downtime and repair cost are of great importance to the public while not directly considered in ASCE 41-13 and other local building documents. Hence, the SP3 Risk Model Engine, was used to calculate the mean loss and time to regain function. Implementation of test data in the SP3 analysis input showed not only the retrofit program enhanced building performance in terms of life safety of the occupants, but it also showed lower expected loss, as well as significantly lower downtime in comparison to prescriptive retrofit methods.
Author: S. Tanvir Wasti
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 1402045719
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 563
Get Book Here
Book Description
Earthquakes affecting urban areas can lead to catastrophic situations and hazard mitigation requires preparatory measures at all levels. Structural assessment is the diagnosis of the seismic health of buildings. Assessment is the prelude to decisions about rehabilitation or even demolition. The scale of the problem in dense urban settings brings about a need for macro seismic appraisal procedures because large numbers of existing buildings do not conform to the increased requirements of new earthquake codes and specifications or have other deficiencies. It is the vulnerable buildings - liable to cause damage and loss of life - that need immediate attention and urgent appraisal in order to decide if structural rehabilitation and upgrading are feasible. Current economic, efficient and occupant-friendly rehabilitation techniques vary widely and include the application either of precast concrete panels or layers, strips and patches of fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) in strategic locations. The papers in this book, many by renowned authorities in earthquake engineering, chart new and vital directions of research and application in the assessment and rehabilitation of buildings in seismic regions. While several papers discuss the probabilistic prediction and quantification of structural damage, others present approaches related with the in-situ and occupant friendly upgrading of buildings and propose both economical and practical techniques to address the problem.
Author: Shamim A. Sheikh
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 282
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Zaid Al-Sadoon
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Yahya Cüneyt Kurama
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Buildings, Reinforced concrete
Languages : en
Pages : 294
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: fib Fédération internationale du béton
Publisher: fib Fédération internationale du béton
ISBN: 9782883940642
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 322
Get Book Here
Book Description
In most parts of the developed world, the building stock and the civil infrastructure are ageing and in constant need of maintenance, repair and upgrading. Moreover, in the light of our current knowledge and of modern codes, the majority of buildings stock and other types of structures in many parts of the world are substandard and deficient. This is especially so in earthquake-prone regions, as, even there, seismic design of structures is relatively recent. In those regions the major part of the seismic threat to human life and property comes from old buildings. Due to the infrastructure's increasing decay, frequently combined with the need for structural upgrading to meet more stringent design requirements (especially against seismic loads), structural retrofitting is becoming more and more important and receives today considerable emphasis throughout the world. In response to this need, a major part of the fib Model Code 2005, currently under development, is being devoted to structural conservation and maintenance. More importantly, in recognition of the importance of the seismic threat arising from existing substandard buildings, the first standards for structural upgrading to be promoted by the international engineering community and by regulatory authorities alike are for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. This is the case, for example, of Part 3: Strengthening and Repair of Buildings of Eurocode 8 (i. e. of the draft European Standard for earthquake-resistant design), and which is the only one among the current (2003) set of 58 Eurocodes attempting to address the problem of structural upgrading. It is also the case of the recent (2001) ASCE draft standard on Seismic evaluation of existing buildings and of the 1996 Law for promotion of seismic strengthening of existing reinforced concrete structures in Japan. As noted in Chapter 1 of this Bulletin, fib - as CEB and FIP did before - has placed considerable emphasis on assessment and rehabilitation of existing structures. The present Bulletin is a culmination of this effort in the special but very important field of seismic assessment and rehabilitation. It has been elaborated over a period of 4 years by Task Group 7.1 Assessment and retrofit of existing structures of fib Commission 7 Seismic design, a truly international team of experts, representing the expertise and experience of all the important seismic regions of the world. In the course of its work the team had six plenary two-day meetings: in January 1999 in Pavia, Italy; in August 1999 in Raleigh, North Carolina; in February 2000 in Queenstown, New Zealand; in July 2000 in Patras, Greece; in March 2001 in Lausanne, Switzerland; and in August 2001 in Seattle, Washington. In October 2002 the final draft of the Bulletin was presented to public during the 1st fib Congress in Osaka. It was also there that it was approved by fib Commission 7 Seismic Design. The contents is structured into main chapters as follows: 1 Introduction - 2 Performance objectives and system considerations - 3 Review of seismic assessment procedures - 4 Strength and deformation capacity of non-seismically detailed components - 5 Seismic retrofitting techniques - 6 Probabilistic concepts and methods - 7 Case studies
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Reinforced concrete construction
Languages : en
Pages : 188
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: D. Choudhuri
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Buildings, Reinforced concrete
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
