Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books

Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books PDF Author: Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on NASA's Research on Human Health Risks
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Evidence-based medicine
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book

Book Description

Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books

Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books PDF Author: Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on NASA's Research on Human Health Risks
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Evidence-based medicine
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book

Book Description


Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books

Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books PDF Author: Board on Health Sciences Policy
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic book
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book

Book Description


Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks

Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks PDF Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309380642
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 83

Get Book

Book Description
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks 2015 Letter Report is the third in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports. This letter report reviews seven evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.

Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks

Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks PDF Author: Institute of Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309296552
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 45

Get Book

Book Description
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2013 Letter Report is the first in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports. This letter report reviews three evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.

A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes

A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes PDF Author: Institute of Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309260531
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 53

Get Book

Book Description
At the request of NASA, an IOM committee reviewed NASA Human Research Program's (HRP's) Scientific Merit Assessment Processes for directed research. Directed research is commissioned or noncompetitively awarded research that is not competitively solicited because of specific reasons, such as time limitations or highly focused or constrained research topics. The scientific merit assessment processes have been developed by NASA to evaluate individual directed research tasks in order to ensure the scientific integrity of the HRP's directed research portfolio. The committee examined the HRP's current scientific merit assessment processes and conducted a public workshop to identify best practices among other federal agencies that use various assessment processes for similar types of directed research. Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Processes: Letter Report finds that the scientific merit assessment process used by the HRP for directed research is scientifically rigorous and is similar to the processes and merit criteria used by many other federal agencies and organizations - including the Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health, and the United States Department of Agriculture - for comparable types of research. This report also makes recommendations on ways to streamline and bolster the accountability and transparency of NASA's current processes.

A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes

A Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes PDF Author: Institute of Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309260507
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 53

Get Book

Book Description
At the request of NASA, an IOM committee reviewed NASA Human Research Program's (HRP's) Scientific Merit Assessment Processes for directed research. Directed research is commissioned or noncompetitively awarded research that is not competitively solicited because of specific reasons, such as time limitations or highly focused or constrained research topics. The scientific merit assessment processes have been developed by NASA to evaluate individual directed research tasks in order to ensure the scientific integrity of the HRP's directed research portfolio. The committee examined the HRP's current scientific merit assessment processes and conducted a public workshop to identify best practices among other federal agencies that use various assessment processes for similar types of directed research. Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Processes: Letter Report finds that the scientific merit assessment process used by the HRP for directed research is scientifically rigorous and is similar to the processes and merit criteria used by many other federal agencies and organizations - including the Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health, and the United States Department of Agriculture - for comparable types of research. This report also makes recommendations on ways to streamline and bolster the accountability and transparency of NASA's current processes.

Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks

Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks PDF Author: Board on Health Sciences Policy
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780309314510
Category : Health & Fitness
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book

Book Description
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks 2014 Letter Report is the second in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports. This letter report reviews seven evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.

Human Health and Performance Risks of Space Exploration Missions

Human Health and Performance Risks of Space Exploration Missions PDF Author: Jancy C. McPhee
Publisher: U. S. National Aeronautics & Space Administration
ISBN:
Category : Biography & Autobiography
Languages : en
Pages : 396

Get Book

Book Description


Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks

Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks PDF Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309451256
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 77

Get Book

Book Description
This is the fourth in a series of five letter reports that provide an independent review of the more than 30 evidence reports that NASA has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration spaceflights.This letter report reviews eight evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input.

Human Health and Performance Risks of Space Exploration Missions

Human Health and Performance Risks of Space Exploration Missions PDF Author: Jancy C. McPhee
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780160846342
Category : Astronauts
Languages : en
Pages : 389

Get Book

Book Description