Rapport Du Directeur Général Des Élections Du Canada Sur L'élection Partielle Tenue Le 12 Mai 2003 Dans Perth-Middlesex Et Les Élections Partielles Tenues Le 16 Juin 2003 Dans Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière Et Témiscamingue PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Rapport Du Directeur Général Des Élections Du Canada Sur L'élection Partielle Tenue Le 12 Mai 2003 Dans Perth-Middlesex Et Les Élections Partielles Tenues Le 16 Juin 2003 Dans Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière Et Témiscamingue PDF full book. Access full book title Rapport Du Directeur Général Des Élections Du Canada Sur L'élection Partielle Tenue Le 12 Mai 2003 Dans Perth-Middlesex Et Les Élections Partielles Tenues Le 16 Juin 2003 Dans Lévis-et-Chutes-de-la-Chaudière Et Témiscamingue by Elections Canada. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Elections Canada
Publisher: Élections Canada
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Elections Canada
Publisher: Élections Canada
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Elections Canada
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Elections
Languages : fr
Pages : 368
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Elections Canada
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Elections
Languages : fr
Pages : 142
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Samuel Scheffler
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0191040169
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 133
Get Book
Book Description
In contemporary philosophy, substantive moral theories are typically classified as either consequentialist or deontological. Standard consequentialist theories insist, roughly, that agents must always act so as to produce the best available outcomes overall. Standard deontological theories, by contrast, maintain that there are some circumstances where one is permitted but not required to produce the best overall results, and still other circumstances in which one is positively forbidden to do so. Classical utilitarianism is the most familiar consequentialist view, but it is widely regarded as an inadequate account of morality. Although Professor Scheffler agrees with this assessment, he also believes that consequentialism seems initially plausible, and that there is a persistent air of paradox surrounding typical deontological views. In this book, therefore, he undertakes to reconsider the rejection of consequentialism. He argues that it is possible to provide a rationale for the view that agents need not always produce the best possible overall outcomes, and this motivates one departure from consequentialism; but he shows that it is surprisingly difficult to provide a satisfactory rationale for the view that there are times when agents must not produce the best possible overall outcomes. He goes on to argue for a hitherto neglected type of moral conception, according to which agents are always permitted, but not always required, to produce the best outcomes.