Preparation of the Implementation Plan of AASHTO Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide (M-EPDG) in Connecticut

Preparation of the Implementation Plan of AASHTO Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide (M-EPDG) in Connecticut PDF Author: Iliya Yut
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pavements, Asphalt
Languages : en
Pages : 133

Get Book Here

Book Description

Preparation of the Implementation Plan of AASHTO Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide (M-EPDG) in Connecticut

Preparation of the Implementation Plan of AASHTO Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide (M-EPDG) in Connecticut PDF Author: Iliya Yut
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pavements, Asphalt
Languages : en
Pages : 133

Get Book Here

Book Description


Preparation of the Implementation Plan of AASHTO Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide (M-E PDG) in Connecticut

Preparation of the Implementation Plan of AASHTO Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide (M-E PDG) in Connecticut PDF Author: Iliya Yut
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pavements, Asphalt
Languages : en
Pages : 126

Get Book Here

Book Description


Implementation of the AASHTO Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide and Software

Implementation of the AASHTO Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide and Software PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pavements
Languages : en
Pages : 84

Get Book Here

Book Description
Introduction -- Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide and AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design (TM) Software Overview -- Survey of Agency Pavement Design Practices -- Common Elements of Agency Implementation Plans -- Case Examples of Agency Implementation -- Conclusions.

Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide Implementation Plan

Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide Implementation Plan PDF Author: Todd E. Hoerner
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pavements
Languages : en
Pages : 324

Get Book Here

Book Description
As AASH is expected to eventually adopt the MEPDG at its primary pavement design method, it is critical that the SDDOT become familiar with the MEPGD documentation and associated design software. The research conducted under this project was a first step toward achieving this goal.

Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide

Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide PDF Author: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Publisher: AASHTO
ISBN: 156051423X
Category : Pavements
Languages : en
Pages : 218

Get Book Here

Book Description


Guide for the Local Calibration of the Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide

Guide for the Local Calibration of the Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide PDF Author:
Publisher: AASHTO
ISBN: 1560514493
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 202

Get Book Here

Book Description
This guide provides guidance to calibrate the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) software to local conditions, policies, and materials. It provides the highway community with a state-of-the-practice tool for the design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures, based on mechanistic-empirical (M-E) principles. The design procedure calculates pavement responses (stresses, strains, and deflections) and uses those responses to compute incremental damage over time. The procedure empirically relates the cumulative damage to observed pavement distresses.

Implementation of the Mechanistic-empiricalpavement [sic] Design Guide (MEPDG)

Implementation of the Mechanistic-empiricalpavement [sic] Design Guide (MEPDG) PDF Author: George Abraham Dzotepe
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pavements
Languages : en
Pages : 137

Get Book Here

Book Description
Current pavement design methodology based on the AASHTO Design Guide uses an empirical approach based on the results of the AASHTO Road Test conducted in 1958. But limitations of the current guide led AAHSTO to publish the new Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), which combines mechanistic and empirical methodology by using calculations of pavement responses, such as stress, strains, and deformations (mechanistic) using site specific inputs from climate, material, and traffic properties. As a new design guide and with large data inputs required, there are bound to be challenges. In this respect, the MEPDG is currently undergoing many changes with further research being conducted at the national, regional, and local levels into various aspects of the guide, especially in the areas of materials, climate, and traffic characteristics. It is hoped that the findings from various research studies will facilitate the implementaion of the MEPDG within national, regional, and local transportation agencies and professionals. Consequently, a North-West States' MEPDG User Group meeting was held in Oregon on March 9-10 to discuss the region's implementation plans and progress, related technical issues, and the future direction of the MEPDG. This report summarizes the findings from the meeting and seeks to outline the research needs necessary to facilitate the implementation of the MEPDG in the North-West region.

Implementation Plan for the New Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide

Implementation Plan for the New Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design Guide PDF Author: Y. Richard Kim
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pavements
Languages : en
Pages : 690

Get Book Here

Book Description


Draft User's Guide for UDOT Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design

Draft User's Guide for UDOT Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design PDF Author: Michael I. Darter
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Pavements
Languages : en
Pages : 136

Get Book Here

Book Description
Validation of the new AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide's (MEPDG) nationally calibrated pavement distress and smoothness prediction models when applied under Utah conditions, and local calibration of the new hot-mix asphalt (HMA) pavement total rutting model, were recently completed as documented in UDOT Research Report No. UT-09.11 Implementation of the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide in Utah: Validation, Calibration, and Development of the UDOT MEPDG User's Guide, dated October 2009. This Draft User's Guide incorporates the findings of the model validation and local calibration report and provides information for use by UDOT's pavement design engineers during trial implementation of the MEPDG. This information includes an overview of the MEPDG procedure, information on installation of the software, guidelines for obtaining all needed inputs, guidance to perform pavement design using the software for new and rehabilitated HMA pavement and jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP), and pavement design examples for new HMA pavement and new JPCP using the MEPDG software.

Flexible Pavement Design

Flexible Pavement Design PDF Author: Ashraf Ayman Aguib
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Maintainability (Engineering)
Languages : en
Pages : 268

Get Book Here

Book Description
Abstract: The new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) provides a state- of-the-art and practice pavement design procedure that eradicates the AASHTO 1993 empirical design procedure deficiencies. Huge advancements with respect to traffic input, material characterization and environmental impact are incorporated in the MEPDG. The AASHTO 1993 design procedure is based on empirical equations derived from the AASHO Road Test conducted in the late 1950's in a test track in Ottawa, Illinois. The test provided very useful information for the design of pavement at that time. However, with the present advancement in materials and dramatic increase in traffic volumes, this empirical design procedure started to show massive drawbacks. The MEPDG is a more comprehensive design procedure that incorporates sophisticated models for pavement response calculation, material properties variations with respect to environmental conditions and pavement performance predictions. The mechanistic part of the design procedure is the pavement response calculation and the empirical part of the method is the pavement performance prediction. Incorporating these models allows the MEPDG of producing pavement design sections that are cost-effective and perform better than those designed using the AASHTO 1993 design procedure for a given life span. With the initial introduction of the MEPDG in 2004, almost every State Highway Agency (SHA) in the United States and several road authorities around the world exerted efforts to understand and plan to implement the MEPDG according to their own local conditions. It was hence found necessary to explore the new design procedure according to Egyptian local conditions. The objectives of the research is to prepare a body of accurate and readily usable environmental data for Egypt for MEPDG input, compare the effectiveness of both design methods and assess the sensitivity of MEPDG predicted performance with respect to variations in inputs. Weather data files for major Egyptian cities were extracted from available data sources and prepared for direct input in the MEPDG. The preparation of data was done using a computer application especially developed in this research program to comprehensively and rationally complete this task. A comparative study was then done between the two design methods. Five pavement sections were designed using the AASHTO 1993 design procedure and then evaluated using the MEPDG for three traffic levels. These five sections were chosen to best represent the majority of Egypt. A sensitivity analysis was then conducted to investigate the predicted behavior of fatigue cracking and rutting with respect to variations in environmental conditions, traffic levels, AC layer thickness and properties, granular base (GB) layer thickness and subgrade strength. Comparing both design methods revealed that pavements designed under the AASHTO 1993 do not perform equally at the end of their design life. Terminal Present Serviceability Index (PSI) values are different for different traffic levels and locations. Predicted fatigue cracking and rutting showed a similar trend to terminal PSI values. The AASHTO 1993 was also found to over-estimate pavement layers thicknesses. Predicted fatigue cracking showed high sensitivity to design inputs under the scope of the study. Environmental conditions and traffic loading were also found to be the most influential input parameters on the selected pavement performance indices. Unexpected results for predicted rutting lead to further investigation and MEDPG rutting prediction model was evaluated with respect to an Egyptian rutting prediction model. Rutting prediction model adopted by MEPDG produced lower values for permanent strain compare to the Egyptian rutting model and further calibration for the MEPDG rutting prediction model was found necessary.