Constitutional Precedent in US Supreme Court Reasoning PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Constitutional Precedent in US Supreme Court Reasoning PDF full book. Access full book title Constitutional Precedent in US Supreme Court Reasoning by Schultz, David. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Schultz, David
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
ISBN: 1839103132
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 200
Get Book
Book Description
Precedent is an important tool of judicial decision making and reasoning in common law systems such as the United States. Instead of having each court decide cases anew, the rule of precedent or stares decisis dictates that similar cases should be decided similarly. Adherence to precedent promotes several values, including stability, reliability, and uniformity, and it also serves to constrain judicial discretion. While adherence to precedent is important, there are some cases where the United States Supreme Court does not follow it when it comes to constitutional reasoning. Over time the US Supreme Court under its different Chief Justices has approached rejection of its own precedent in different ways and at varying rates of reversal. This book examines the role of constitutional precedent in US Supreme Court reasoning.
Author: Schultz, David
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
ISBN: 1839103132
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 200
Get Book
Book Description
Precedent is an important tool of judicial decision making and reasoning in common law systems such as the United States. Instead of having each court decide cases anew, the rule of precedent or stares decisis dictates that similar cases should be decided similarly. Adherence to precedent promotes several values, including stability, reliability, and uniformity, and it also serves to constrain judicial discretion. While adherence to precedent is important, there are some cases where the United States Supreme Court does not follow it when it comes to constitutional reasoning. Over time the US Supreme Court under its different Chief Justices has approached rejection of its own precedent in different ways and at varying rates of reversal. This book examines the role of constitutional precedent in US Supreme Court reasoning.
Author: Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Annotations and citations (Law)
Languages : en
Pages : 1244
Get Book
Book Description
![Notes on the American Decisions [1760-1869] PDF](https://books.google.com/books/content/images/frontcover/zH00AQAAMAAJ?fife=w80-h100)
Author: Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 1316
Get Book
Book Description
Includes 1-95 Am. Dec.
Author: Bryan A. Garner
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780314634207
Category : Judicial process
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
The Law of Judicial Precedent is the first hornbook-style treatise on the doctrine of precedent in more than a century. It is the product of 13 distinguished coauthors, 12 of whom are appellate judges whose professional work requires them to deal with precedents daily. Together with their editor and coauthor, Bryan A. Garner, the judges have thoroughly researched and explored the many intricacies of the doctrine as it guides the work of American lawyers and judges. The treatise is organized into nine major topics, comprising 93 blackletter sections that elucidate all the major doctrines relating to how past decisions guide future ones in our common-law system. The authors' goal was to make the book theoretically sound, historically illuminating, and relentlessly practical. The breadth and depth of research involved in producing the book will be immediately apparent to anyone who browses its pages and glances over the footnotes: it would have been all but impossible for any single author to canvass the literature so comprehensively and then distill the concepts so cohesively into a single authoritative volume. More than 2,500 illustrative cases discussed or cited in the text illuminate the points covered in each section and demonstrate the law's development over several centuries. The cases are explained in a clear, commonsense way, making the book accessible to anyone seeking to understand the role of precedents in American law. Never before have so many eminent coauthors produced a single lawbook without signed sections, but instead writing with a single voice. Whether you are a judge, a lawyer, a law student, or even a nonlawyer curious about how our legal system works, you're sure to find enlightening, helpful, and sometimes surprising insights into our system of justice.
Author: Thomas G. Hansford
Publisher: Princeton University Press
ISBN: 0691188041
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 155
Get Book
Book Description
The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court offers an insightful and provocative analysis of the Supreme Court's most important task--shaping the law. Thomas Hansford and James Spriggs analyze a key aspect of legal change: the Court's interpretation or treatment of the precedents it has set in the past. Court decisions do not just resolve immediate disputes; they also set broader precedent. The meaning and scope of a precedent, however, can change significantly as the Court revisits it in future cases. The authors contend that these interpretations are driven by an interaction between policy goals and variations in the legal authoritativeness of precedent. From this premise, they build an explanation of the legal interpretation of precedent that yields novel predictions about the nature and timing of legal change. Hansford and Spriggs test their hypotheses by examining how the Court has interpreted the precedents it set between 1946 and 1999. This analysis provides compelling support for their argument, and demonstrates that the justices' ideological goals and the role of precedent are inextricably linked. The two prevailing, yet contradictory, views of precedent--that it acts either solely as a constraint, or as a "cloak" that never actually influences the Court--are incorrect. This book shows that while precedent can operate as a constraint on the justices' decisions, it also represents an opportunity to foster preferred societal outcomes.
Author: Michael J. Gerhardt
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199795797
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 353
Get Book
Book Description
The author connects the vast social science data and legal scholarship to provide a wide-ranging assessment of precedent. He outlines the major issues in the continuing debates on the significance of precedent and evenly considers all sides.
Author: Randy J. Kozel
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 110712753X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 191
Get Book
Book Description
This book analyzes the theoretical nuances and practical implications of how judges use precedent.
Author: Bernard Ernest Witkin
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Annotations and citations (Law)
Languages : en
Pages : 244
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Marc Jacob
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107045495
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 357
Get Book
Book Description
Marc Jacob analyses in depth the most important justificatory and decision-making tool of one of the world's most powerful courts.
Author: American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781590318737
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 216
Get Book
Book Description
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.
