Measuring Judicial Activism

Measuring Judicial Activism PDF Author: Stefanie Lindqquist
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0195370856
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 189

Get Book

Book Description
'Measuring Judicial Activism' supplies empirical analysis to the widely discussed concept of judicial activism at the United States Supreme Court. The book seeks to move beyond more subjective debates by conceptualizing activism in non-ideological terms.

Measuring Judicial Activism

Measuring Judicial Activism PDF Author: Stefanie Lindqquist
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0195370856
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 189

Get Book

Book Description
'Measuring Judicial Activism' supplies empirical analysis to the widely discussed concept of judicial activism at the United States Supreme Court. The book seeks to move beyond more subjective debates by conceptualizing activism in non-ideological terms.

Measuring Judicial Activism

Measuring Judicial Activism PDF Author: Stefanie A. Lindquist
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780199870790
Category : Electronic books
Languages : en
Pages : 176

Get Book

Book Description
'Measuring Judicial Activism' supplies empirical analysis to the widely discussed concept of judicial activism at the United States Supreme Court. The book seeks to move beyond more subjective debates by conceptualizing activism in non-ideological terms.

The Myth of Judicial Activism

The Myth of Judicial Activism PDF Author: Kermit Roosevelt
Publisher: Yale University Press
ISBN: 0300129564
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 272

Get Book

Book Description
Constitutional scholar Kermit Roosevelt uses plain language and compelling examples to explain how the Constitution can be both a constant and an organic document, and takes a balanced look at controversial decisions through a compelling new lens of constitutional interpretation.

Judging Law and Policy

Judging Law and Policy PDF Author: Robert M. Howard
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1136887601
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 245

Get Book

Book Description
To what extent do courts make social and public policy and influence policy change? This innovative text analyzes this question generally and in seven distinct policy areas that play out in both federal and state courts—tax policy, environmental policy, reproductive rights, sex equality, affirmative action, school finance, and same-sex marriage. The authors address these issues through the twin lenses of how state and federal courts must and do interact with the other branches of government and whether judicial policy-making is a form of activist judging. Each chapter uncovers the policymaking aspects of judicial process by investigating the current state of the law, the extent of court involvement in policy change, the responses of other governmental entities and outside actors, and the factors which influenced the degree of implementation and impact of the relevant court decisions. Throughout the book, Howard and Steigerwalt examine and analyze the literature on judicial policy-making as well as evaluate existing measures of judicial ideology, judicial activism, court and legal policy formation, policy change and policy impact. This unique text offers new insights and areas to research in this important field of American politics.

Radical Deprivation on Trial

Radical Deprivation on Trial PDF Author: César A. RodrÃ-guez-Garavito
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107078881
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 235

Get Book

Book Description
Using a Colombian case study, this book assesses the potential for court rulings to enact real-life social change.

The Supreme Court in American Politics

The Supreme Court in American Politics PDF Author: David F. Forte
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 118

Get Book

Book Description


Judicial Activism

Judicial Activism PDF Author: Sterling Harwood
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 192

Get Book

Book Description
This study explores the various arguments in favor and against activism offered in leading theories, including treatment of the democratic framework of courts, of the importance of predecent or stare decisis in judicial decision, and of the justification of activism by procedural due process. Reconsidering these same criticisms passivists make about activism, Harwood builds a tightly-argued case in favor of activism.

Proportionality and Judicial Activism

Proportionality and Judicial Activism PDF Author: Niels Petersen
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107177987
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 261

Get Book

Book Description
This book uses empirical analysis to show that courts refrain from using the proportionality test as a means of judicial activism.

Scalia v. Epstein

Scalia v. Epstein PDF Author: Antonin Scalia
Publisher: Cato Institute
ISBN: 1937184463
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 21

Get Book

Book Description
With the appointment of William H. Rehnquist as Chief Justice of the United States and Antonin Scalia as associate justice, there is renewed interest in questions of judicial activism and the role of the courts in protecting personal and economic liberties. To further public discussion of these fundamental questions, the Cato Institute is pleased to present this debate between Judge Scalia and Richard A.Epstein, James Parker Hall Professor of Law at the University of Chicago and editor of the Journal of Legal Studies. These papers were originally delivered at the Cato Institute's conference "Economic Liberties and the Judiciary" on October 26,1984, and appeared in the Winter 1985 issue of the Cato Journal.

Measuring Judicial Independence

Measuring Judicial Independence PDF Author: J. Mark Ramseyer
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
ISBN: 0226703878
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 214

Get Book

Book Description
The role of the U.S. Supreme Court in the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election raised questions in the minds of many Americans about the relationships between judges and political influence; the following years saw equally heated debates over the appropriate role of political ideology in selecting federal judges. Legal scholars have always debated these questions—asking, in effect, how much judicial systems operate on merit and principle and how much they are shaped by politics. The Japanese Constitution, like many others, requires that all judges be "independent in the exercise of their conscience and bound only by this Constitution and its laws." Consistent with this requirement, Japanese courts have long enjoyed a reputation for vigilant independence—an idea challenged only occasionally, and most often anecdotally. But in this book, J. Mark Ramseyer and Eric B. Rasmusen use the latest statistical techniques to examine whether that reputation always holds up to scrutiny—whether, and to what extent, the careers of lower court judges can be manipulated to political advantage. On the basis of careful econometric analysis of career data for hundreds of judges, Ramseyer and Rasmusen find that Japanese politics do influence judicial careers, discreetly and indirectly: judges who decide politically charged cases in ways favored by the ruling party enjoy better careers after their decisions than might otherwise be expected, while dissenting judges are more likely to find their careers hampered by assignments to less desirable positions. Ramseyer and Rasmusen's sophisticated yet accessible analysis has much to offer anyone interested in either judicial independence or the application of econometric techniques in the social sciences.