Author: Rich Jones
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative auditing
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Book Description
Legislative Program Evaluation in the States
Author: Rich Jones
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative auditing
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative auditing
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Book Description
Legislative Program Evaluation Conducted by State Legislatures in the United States
Author: John S. Risley (Ph. D.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Administrative agencies
Languages : en
Pages : 340
Book Description
This study examines how U.S. state legislative staffs conduct evaluations. The study addresses the ubiquity of state legislative program evaluation (LPE) units, the standards those units follow, the recommendations that LPE reports proffer, and the quality of the reports on several criteria. The study also addresses the feasibility of using metaevaluation to evaluate a large number of reports using solely the information contained in the reports. The study uses metaevaluation criteria developed by combining aspects of, primarily, the Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) for performance audits, the Joint Committee's Program Evaluation Standards (PES), and, secondarily, Scriven's Key Evaluation Checklist. In the process of developing the metaevaluation criteria the GAGAS and the PES are closely compared. The criteria were applied to a random sample of 100 of the 1,911 LPE reports published by state LPE units from 2001 through 2005. The study finds that state LPE units, and consequently the reports they produce, are overwhelmingly more connected to performance auditing and the GAGAS than to evaluation and evaluation standards. The metaevaluation criterion on which the LPE reports varied most was the comparisons criterion. Roughly a third of all LPE reports were graded excellent or good, another third fair, and the final third poor, reflecting no mention of comparisons in the report. Evaluations were more likely to be graded excellent or good on this criterion than were performance audits. This study also seeks to test a methodological model-- that of using metaevaluation to examine a large number of reports. The results from this attempt are mixed. Using metaevaluation in this way can determine the specific areas where evaluation reports are excelling or failing. However, accurately and fairly evaluating reports solely from the report itself presents some major problems. Among these problems are the inability to check both the accuracy of most data collected and the propriety of techniques used to collect data from human subjects. Nevertheless, we can formulate important conclusions including how well LPE reports use comparative studies when reaching their conclusions, how focused the reports are on goals and objectives, and how closely the reports follow established professional standards.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Administrative agencies
Languages : en
Pages : 340
Book Description
This study examines how U.S. state legislative staffs conduct evaluations. The study addresses the ubiquity of state legislative program evaluation (LPE) units, the standards those units follow, the recommendations that LPE reports proffer, and the quality of the reports on several criteria. The study also addresses the feasibility of using metaevaluation to evaluate a large number of reports using solely the information contained in the reports. The study uses metaevaluation criteria developed by combining aspects of, primarily, the Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) for performance audits, the Joint Committee's Program Evaluation Standards (PES), and, secondarily, Scriven's Key Evaluation Checklist. In the process of developing the metaevaluation criteria the GAGAS and the PES are closely compared. The criteria were applied to a random sample of 100 of the 1,911 LPE reports published by state LPE units from 2001 through 2005. The study finds that state LPE units, and consequently the reports they produce, are overwhelmingly more connected to performance auditing and the GAGAS than to evaluation and evaluation standards. The metaevaluation criterion on which the LPE reports varied most was the comparisons criterion. Roughly a third of all LPE reports were graded excellent or good, another third fair, and the final third poor, reflecting no mention of comparisons in the report. Evaluations were more likely to be graded excellent or good on this criterion than were performance audits. This study also seeks to test a methodological model-- that of using metaevaluation to examine a large number of reports. The results from this attempt are mixed. Using metaevaluation in this way can determine the specific areas where evaluation reports are excelling or failing. However, accurately and fairly evaluating reports solely from the report itself presents some major problems. Among these problems are the inability to check both the accuracy of most data collected and the propriety of techniques used to collect data from human subjects. Nevertheless, we can formulate important conclusions including how well LPE reports use comparative studies when reaching their conclusions, how focused the reports are on goals and objectives, and how closely the reports follow established professional standards.
Legislative Program Evaluation in the States
Author: Mark Lincoln Chadwin
Publisher: Transaction Pub
ISBN: 9780878556540
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 47
Book Description
Publisher: Transaction Pub
ISBN: 9780878556540
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 47
Book Description
The Development and Problems of Legislative Program Evaluation in the American States
Author: Daniel William Jordan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislation
Languages : en
Pages : 260
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislation
Languages : en
Pages : 260
Book Description
Legislative Program Evaluation: Utilization-Driven Research for Decision Makers
Author: Richard Kirk Jonas
Publisher: Jossey-Bass
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 132
Book Description
Legislative program evaluation (LPE) allows legislatures to ensure that the programs they establish or fund are operating efficiently, effectively, and economically. Unlike evaluations that have knowledge development as their primary purposes, LPE is utilization-driven because its customer-the legislature-demands useful, timely knowledge "in plain English." LPE's focus on utilization creates some unique conditions, methods, processes, and products that add overall value to the field of program evaluation.
Publisher: Jossey-Bass
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 132
Book Description
Legislative program evaluation (LPE) allows legislatures to ensure that the programs they establish or fund are operating efficiently, effectively, and economically. Unlike evaluations that have knowledge development as their primary purposes, LPE is utilization-driven because its customer-the legislature-demands useful, timely knowledge "in plain English." LPE's focus on utilization creates some unique conditions, methods, processes, and products that add overall value to the field of program evaluation.
State Legislative Program Evaluation
Author: Robert E. Haddock
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative oversight
Languages : en
Pages : 556
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative oversight
Languages : en
Pages : 556
Book Description
Legislative Auditing and Evaluation in Selected States
Author: Russ Whitesel
Publisher: Legislative Reference Bureau
ISBN:
Category : Legislative auditing
Languages : en
Pages : 48
Book Description
Publisher: Legislative Reference Bureau
ISBN:
Category : Legislative auditing
Languages : en
Pages : 48
Book Description
Introduction, Program Evaluation Division, Office of the Legislative Auditor, State of Minnesota
Author: Minnesota. Legislature. Office of the Legislative Auditor. Program Evaluation Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Book Description
Legislative Program Evaluation Offices
Author: Mary M. Janicki
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Finance, Public
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Discusses the type of organization of other states' legislative program evaluation offices. Describes models for performing financial and performance audits of state programs and agencies.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Finance, Public
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Discusses the type of organization of other states' legislative program evaluation offices. Describes models for performing financial and performance audits of state programs and agencies.
The Effectiveness of Legislative Program Review
Author: Richard E. Brown
Publisher: Transaction Publishers
ISBN: 9781412850216
Category : Legislative auditing
Languages : en
Pages : 180
Book Description
Publisher: Transaction Publishers
ISBN: 9781412850216
Category : Legislative auditing
Languages : en
Pages : 180
Book Description