Author: Ralph Sullivan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Revolving funds
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Legislative History for State Revolving Loan Funds in the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1987 (Water Quality Act of 1987)
Author: Ralph Sullivan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Revolving funds
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Revolving funds
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Clean Water Act
Author: U S Government Accountability Office (G
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781289015497
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Book Description
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed selected states' use of their revolving funds, focusing on the: (1) amount of funds lent and the percentage of available funds lent, as of the end of each state's fiscal year (FY) 1996; and (2) factors at the federal and state levels that constrained the amount and percentage of funds lent. GAO found that: (1) the nine states GAO surveyed increased the total amount of funds they lent from $3.3 billion in 1995 to $4.0 billion in 1996; (2) six states achieved an increase of between 15 and 29 percent, and the other three states achieved an increase of 30 percent or more; (3) seven of the nine states increased the percentage of available funds they lent, and of these seven, three states increased this proportion by 17 percentage points or more; (4) the percentage of funds lent as of the end of 1996 varied substantially among the nine states; (5) five states had lent 80 percent or more of their available funds, three states had lent between 70 and 79 percent, and one state had lent 60 percent; (6) in eight of the nine states, officials identified the expiration of the authorizing legislation, as well as federal requirements, as affecting the amount and percentage of funds lent; (7) officials in seven states said that other federal requirements, such as a prevailing-wage provision, discouraged some communities from seeking loans; (8) in two states, officials said that the decisions made by the state programs constrained lending; (9) program managers in one state decided to finance certain wastewater projects from state funds rather than from the revolving fund, thereby limiting both the amount and the percentage of funds lent from the revolving fund; and (10) in the other state, efforts to publicize the program to local officials were not effective in the early years of the program.
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781289015497
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Book Description
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed selected states' use of their revolving funds, focusing on the: (1) amount of funds lent and the percentage of available funds lent, as of the end of each state's fiscal year (FY) 1996; and (2) factors at the federal and state levels that constrained the amount and percentage of funds lent. GAO found that: (1) the nine states GAO surveyed increased the total amount of funds they lent from $3.3 billion in 1995 to $4.0 billion in 1996; (2) six states achieved an increase of between 15 and 29 percent, and the other three states achieved an increase of 30 percent or more; (3) seven of the nine states increased the percentage of available funds they lent, and of these seven, three states increased this proportion by 17 percentage points or more; (4) the percentage of funds lent as of the end of 1996 varied substantially among the nine states; (5) five states had lent 80 percent or more of their available funds, three states had lent between 70 and 79 percent, and one state had lent 60 percent; (6) in eight of the nine states, officials identified the expiration of the authorizing legislation, as well as federal requirements, as affecting the amount and percentage of funds lent; (7) officials in seven states said that other federal requirements, such as a prevailing-wage provision, discouraged some communities from seeking loans; (8) in two states, officials said that the decisions made by the state programs constrained lending; (9) program managers in one state decided to finance certain wastewater projects from state funds rather than from the revolving fund, thereby limiting both the amount and the percentage of funds lent from the revolving fund; and (10) in the other state, efforts to publicize the program to local officials were not effective in the early years of the program.
Water Infrastructure Financing
Author: Congressional Research Congressional Research Service
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781505875140
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 38
Book Description
The principal federal program to aid municipal wastewater treatment plant construction is authorized in the Clean Water Act (CWA). Established as a grant program in 1972, it now capitalizes state loan programs. Authorizations since 1972 have totaled $65 billion, while appropriations have totaled nearly $90 billion. It has represented 25%-30% of total funds appropriated to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in recent years. In appropriations legislation, funding for EPA wastewater assistance is contained in the measure providing funds for the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies, which includes EPA. Within the portion of that bill which funds EPA, wastewater treatment assistance is specified in an account now called State and Tribal Assistance Grants (STAG). Three trends in the funding of this account are most prominent: inclusion of non-infrastructure environmental grants to states, beginning in FY1993; increasing number and amount of special purpose grants since FY1989; and the addition of grant assistance for drinking water treatment projects in FY1997. This report summarizes, in chronological order, congressional activity to fund items in this account since 1987. Prior to the 1987 amendments, wastewater treatment assistance was provided in the form of grants made to municipalities. The federal share of project costs was generally 55%; state and local governments were responsible for the remaining 45%. The 1987 amendments altered this arrangement by replacing the traditional grant program with one that provides federal grants to capitalize state clean water loan programs, or state revolving funds (SRFs). Appropriations for the clean water SRF program through FY2015 have totaled more than $40 billion. As a general matter, states and cities support the program changes made by the 1987 amendments and the shift to a loan program that was intended to provide long-term funding for water quality and wastewater construction activities. However, the change means that local communities now are responsible for 100% of project costs, rather than 45%, because they are required to repay loans to states. The greater financial burden of the act's loan program on some cities has caused some to seek continued grant funding. This has been particularly evident in the appropriations process where, in recent years, Congress has reserved as much as 30% of funds in the STAG account for special purpose grants directed to specified communities. Since FY2000, appropriators have awarded earmarks to a larger total number of projects, resulting in more communities receiving such grants, but at the same time receiving smaller amounts of funds, on average. Most of the funded projects are not authorized in the Clean Water Act or the Safe Drinking Water Act. State water quality officials, state infrastructure financing officials, and EPA have objected to this practice, since it reduces the amount of funding for state SRF programs. Since FY1997, the STAG account also has been used to fund a drinking water SRF program established by Congress in 1996. Appropriations for the drinking water SRF program through FY2015 have totaled $19.1 billion.
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781505875140
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 38
Book Description
The principal federal program to aid municipal wastewater treatment plant construction is authorized in the Clean Water Act (CWA). Established as a grant program in 1972, it now capitalizes state loan programs. Authorizations since 1972 have totaled $65 billion, while appropriations have totaled nearly $90 billion. It has represented 25%-30% of total funds appropriated to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in recent years. In appropriations legislation, funding for EPA wastewater assistance is contained in the measure providing funds for the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies, which includes EPA. Within the portion of that bill which funds EPA, wastewater treatment assistance is specified in an account now called State and Tribal Assistance Grants (STAG). Three trends in the funding of this account are most prominent: inclusion of non-infrastructure environmental grants to states, beginning in FY1993; increasing number and amount of special purpose grants since FY1989; and the addition of grant assistance for drinking water treatment projects in FY1997. This report summarizes, in chronological order, congressional activity to fund items in this account since 1987. Prior to the 1987 amendments, wastewater treatment assistance was provided in the form of grants made to municipalities. The federal share of project costs was generally 55%; state and local governments were responsible for the remaining 45%. The 1987 amendments altered this arrangement by replacing the traditional grant program with one that provides federal grants to capitalize state clean water loan programs, or state revolving funds (SRFs). Appropriations for the clean water SRF program through FY2015 have totaled more than $40 billion. As a general matter, states and cities support the program changes made by the 1987 amendments and the shift to a loan program that was intended to provide long-term funding for water quality and wastewater construction activities. However, the change means that local communities now are responsible for 100% of project costs, rather than 45%, because they are required to repay loans to states. The greater financial burden of the act's loan program on some cities has caused some to seek continued grant funding. This has been particularly evident in the appropriations process where, in recent years, Congress has reserved as much as 30% of funds in the STAG account for special purpose grants directed to specified communities. Since FY2000, appropriators have awarded earmarks to a larger total number of projects, resulting in more communities receiving such grants, but at the same time receiving smaller amounts of funds, on average. Most of the funded projects are not authorized in the Clean Water Act or the Safe Drinking Water Act. State water quality officials, state infrastructure financing officials, and EPA have objected to this practice, since it reduces the amount of funding for state SRF programs. Since FY1997, the STAG account also has been used to fund a drinking water SRF program established by Congress in 1996. Appropriations for the drinking water SRF program through FY2015 have totaled $19.1 billion.
A Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972
Author: Library of Congress. Environmental Policy Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1148
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1148
Book Description
Legislative History of the Clean Water Act of 1987
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Water
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Water
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
The Clean Water Act Amendments of 1987
Author: Mary J. Houghton
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Federal aid to water quality management
Languages : en
Pages : 232
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Federal aid to water quality management
Languages : en
Pages : 232
Book Description
Legislative History of the Water Quality Act of 1987
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Water
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Water
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Legislative History of the Clean Water Act of 1977 - a Continuation of the Legislative History of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act - a Section-By-Section Index, 95Th Congress, 2Nd Session, 1978
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Legislative History of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments 92 Stat. 2467 P.L. 95-576
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
A Legislative History of the Water Quality Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-4)
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental law
Languages : en
Pages : 1124
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental law
Languages : en
Pages : 1124
Book Description