Increasing the Salaries of Federal Judges PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Increasing the Salaries of Federal Judges PDF full book. Access full book title Increasing the Salaries of Federal Judges by United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 76
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 76
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. House. Subcommittee No. 2 of the committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 104
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee No. 2
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 104
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee No. 1
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 76
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Richard A. Posner
Publisher: Harvard University Press
ISBN: 0674033833
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 399
Get Book Here
Book Description
A distinguished and experienced appellate court judge, Richard A. Posner offers in this new book a unique and, to orthodox legal thinkers, a startling perspective on how judges and justices decide cases. When conventional legal materials enable judges to ascertain the true facts of a case and apply clear pre-existing legal rules to them, Posner argues, they do so straightforwardly; that is the domain of legalist reasoning. However, in non-routine cases, the conventional materials run out and judges are on their own, navigating uncharted seas with equipment consisting of experience, emotions, and often unconscious beliefs. In doing so, they take on a legislative role, though one that is confined by internal and external constraints, such as professional ethics, opinions of respected colleagues, and limitations imposed by other branches of government on freewheeling judicial discretion. Occasional legislators, judges are motivated by political considerations in a broad and sometimes a narrow sense of that term. In that open area, most American judges are legal pragmatists. Legal pragmatism is forward-looking and policy-based. It focuses on the consequences of a decision in both the short and the long term, rather than on its antecedent logic. Legal pragmatism so understood is really just a form of ordinary practical reasoning, rather than some special kind of legal reasoning. Supreme Court justices are uniquely free from the constraints on ordinary judges and uniquely tempted to engage in legislative forms of adjudication. More than any other court, the Supreme Court is best understood as a political court.
Author: Joshua M. Dunn
Publisher: UNC Press Books
ISBN: 1469606607
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 239
Get Book Here
Book Description
In 1987 Judge Russell Clark mandated tax increases to help pay for improvements to the Kansas City, Missouri, School District in an effort to lure white students and quality teachers back to the inner-city district. Yet even after increasing employee salaries and constructing elaborate facilities at a cost of more than $2 billion, the district remained overwhelmingly segregated and student achievement remained far below national averages. Just eight years later the U.S. Supreme Court began reversing these initiatives, signifying a major retreat from Brown v. Board of Education. In Kansas City, African American families opposed to the district court's efforts organized a takeover of the school board and requested that the court case be closed. Joshua Dunn argues that Judge Clark's ruling was not the result of tyrannical "judicial activism" but was rather the logical outcome of previous contradictory Supreme Court doctrines. High Court decisions, Dunn explains, necessarily limit the policy choices available to lower court judges, introducing complications the Supreme Court would not anticipate. He demonstrates that the Kansas City case is a model lesson for the types of problems that develop for lower courts in any area in which the Supreme Court attempts to create significant change. Dunn's exploration of this landmark case deepens our understanding of when courts can and cannot successfully create and manage public policy.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government attorneys
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Get Book Here
Book Description
Considers legislation to increase salaries for Judges, Members of Congress, and U.S. Attorneys, and to prohibit private practice by U.S. Attorneys.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government attorneys
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Anna Harvey
Publisher: Yale University Press
ISBN: 0300171110
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 385
Get Book Here
Book Description
In this work, Anna Harvey reports evidence showing that the Supreme Court is in fact extraordinarily deferential to congressional preferences in its constitutional rulings.
Author: Judicial Conference of the United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 60
Get Book Here
Book Description
