Howard P. "Buck" McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Howard P. "Buck" McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 PDF full book. Access full book title Howard P. "Buck" McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military research
Languages : en
Pages : 580
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 580
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military research
Languages : en
Pages : 580
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military research
Languages : en
Pages : 12
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 12
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Michael J. McNerney
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780833096968
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
"Protection of human rights is an essential American value. One way Congress has extended this value in foreign policy is through the 'Leahy laws' (named for their author, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.). These laws prohibit the U.S. government from providing assistance or training to members of a unit of any nation's security forces that has perpetuated a gross violation of human rights with impunity. This report examines the process by which individuals and units are vetted in compliance with the Leahy law applicable to the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to help DoD improve its role in the existing system and to build further capacity to implement the law effectively, with transparency and accountability for results. The authors examined relevant laws, documentation, and data and interviewed over 75 officials from DoD and the U.S. Department of State. The objectives were to understand the requirements and processes, to identify challenges and best practices, and to offer recommendations for improvement. Our research found that Leahy-vetting requirements are generally not a roadblock to security cooperation, but its oversight is challenged by inadequate governance structures. In addition to describing a more robust working group structure, the report outlines about a dozen additional recommendations detailing improvements in six categories: process and policy challenges and best practices, time lines for vetting, clarity of scope for vetting, information used for vetting, adequacy of training and resources, and partner relationships"--Publisher's web site.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military research
Languages : en
Pages : 580
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military research
Languages : en
Pages : 12
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Budget
Languages : en
Pages : 360
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Paul K. Davis
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780833095480
Category : Computers
Languages : en
Pages : 129
Get Book Here
Book Description
This report stems from a congressional request for an independent report about the U.S. Department of Defense s capabilities for joint analysis and ways to improve them. Congressional concerns largely involved the activity called support for strategic analysis (SSA) and whether to revise it. The report recommends making fundamental revisions to the overall planning construct to which SSA contributes."
Author: Congressional Research Service
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781542450041
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Get Book Here
Book Description
Over the past two decades of conflict, women have served with valor and continue to serve on combat aircraft, naval vessels, and in support of ground combat operations. The expansion of roles for women in the Armed Forces has evolved since the early days of the military when women were restricted by law and policy from serving in certain occupations and units. Women have not been precluded by law from serving in any military unit or occupational specialty since 1993 when Congress repealed the remaining prohibitions on women serving on combatant aircraft and vessels. However, Department of Defense (DOD) policies have prevented women from being assigned to units below brigade level where the unit's primary mission was to engage directly in ground combat. This policy barred women from serving in infantry, artillery, armor, combat engineers, and special operations units of battalion size or smaller. On January 24, 2013, then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta rescinded the rule that restricted women from serving in combat units and directed the military departments and services to review their occupational standards and assignment policies and to make recommendations for opening all combat roles to women no later than January 1, 2016. On December 3, 2015, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter ordered the military to open all combat jobs to women with no exceptions. This most recent policy change followed extensive studies that were completed by the military departments and by the Special Operations Command (SOCOM) on issues such as unit cohesion, women's health, equipment, facilities modifications, propensity to serve, and international experiences with women in combat. These studies also included a review and validation of gender-neutral occupational standards for combat roles where such standards existed. On March 10, 2016, Secretary Carter announced that the Services' and SOCOM's implementation plans for the integration of women into direct ground combat roles were approved. Some concerns about the implementation of the new policy remain, including the recruitment, assignment, and career management of women into the new roles, and the impact of integration on unit readiness. Congress has oversight authority in these matters, and may also consider issues such as equal opportunity, equal responsibility (such as selective service registration), and the overall manpower needs of the military.
