Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness PDF Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 9048126142
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 236

Get Book Here

Book Description
In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice. Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness provides a unique insight into the relationship between theoretical and practical conceptions of reasonableness, supported by extensive empirical material gained by means of sophisticated experimental research.

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness PDF Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 9048126142
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 236

Get Book Here

Book Description
In Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice. Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness provides a unique insight into the relationship between theoretical and practical conceptions of reasonableness, supported by extensive empirical material gained by means of sophisticated experimental research.

Handbook of Argumentation Theory

Handbook of Argumentation Theory PDF Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG
ISBN: 3110846098
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
Languages : en
Pages : 344

Get Book Here

Book Description
No detailed description available for "Handbook of Argumentation Theory".

Appeal to Popular Opinion

Appeal to Popular Opinion PDF Author: Douglas Walton
Publisher: Penn State Press
ISBN: 0271042540
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 306

Get Book Here

Book Description


Fallacies and Argument Appraisal

Fallacies and Argument Appraisal PDF Author: Christopher W. Tindale
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1139461842
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 19

Get Book Here

Book Description
Fallacies and Argument Appraisal presents an introduction to the nature, identification, and causes of fallacious reasoning, along with key questions for evaluation. Drawing from the latest work on fallacies as well as some of the standard ideas that have remained relevant since Aristotle, Christopher Tindale investigates central cases of major fallacies in order to understand what has gone wrong and how this has occurred. Dispensing with the approach that simply assigns labels and brief descriptions of fallacies, Tindale provides fuller treatments that recognize the dialectical and rhetorical contexts in which fallacies arise. This volume analyzes major fallacies through accessible, everyday examples. Critical questions are developed for each fallacy to help the student identify them and provide considered evaluations.

Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective PDF Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Springer
ISBN: 3319953818
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 206

Get Book Here

Book Description
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang together. The following crucial topics are discussed: (1) argumentation theory as a discipline; (2) the meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics; (3) the model of a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion; (4) fallacies as violations of a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse; (5) descriptive research of argumentative reality; (6) analysis as theoretically-motivated reconstruction; (7) strategic manoeuvring aimed at combining achieving effectiveness with maintaining reasonableness; (8) the conventionalization of argumentative practices; (9) prototypical argumentative patterns; (10) pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective is clearly written and makes argumentation theory understandable to all scholars and advanced students interested in argumentation research.

One-Sided Arguments

One-Sided Arguments PDF Author: Douglas Walton
Publisher: SUNY Press
ISBN: 9780791442678
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 320

Get Book Here

Book Description
A practical manual for evaluating bias that will be useful to anyone who has to deal with arguments, whether in academic reading or writing, or in everyday conversation.

Judgment Under Uncertainty

Judgment Under Uncertainty PDF Author: Daniel Kahneman
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 9780521284141
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 574

Get Book Here

Book Description
Thirty-five chapters describe various judgmental heuristics and the biases they produce, not only in laboratory experiments, but in important social, medical, and political situations as well. Most review multiple studies or entire subareas rather than describing single experimental studies.

Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse

Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse PDF Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing
ISBN: 9027211191
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
Languages : en
Pages : 323

Get Book Here

Book Description
In "Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse," Frans H. van Eemeren" "brings together the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by introducing the concept of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers to the arguer s continual efforts to reconcile aiming for effectiveness with being reasonable. It takes place in all stages of argumentative discourse and manifests itself simultaneously in the choices that are made from the topical potential available at a particular stage, in adaptation to audience demand, and in the use of specific presentational devices. Strategic maneuvering derails when in the specific context in which the discourse takes place a rule for critical discussion has been violated, so that a fallacy has been committed. Van Eemeren makes clear that extending the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation by taking account of strategic maneuvering leads to a richer and more precise method for analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse."

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse PDF Author: Frans H. van Eemeren
Publisher: Springer
ISBN: 3319209558
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 892

Get Book Here

Book Description
This volume presents 50 contributions on the themes of reasonableness and effectiveness and their connections, which are central issues in argumentation theory. It discusses van Eemeren’s views on the study of argumentation; the approach to argumentation adopted in pragma-dialectics; pragma-dialectical perspectives on the dialectical and pragmatic dimensions of argumentative discourse; the notion of strategic maneuvering; the pragma-dialectical method of analyzing argumentative discourse; the treatment of fallacies as violations of rules for critical discussion; pragma-dialectical views on context, the role of logic, verbal indicators of argumentative moves and argument schemes; and the process of writing and rewriting argumentative texts. The pragma-dialectical quantitative approach to empirical research on argumentative discourse is illustrated by reporting on selected, illustrative experimental studies, as well as qualitative studies of historical cases.

The Practice of Argumentation

The Practice of Argumentation PDF Author: David Zarefsky
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 110703471X
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
Languages : en
Pages : 287

Get Book Here

Book Description
Explores how we justify our beliefs - and try to influence those of others - both soundly and effectively.