Environmental Review Commission PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Environmental Review Commission PDF full book. Access full book title Environmental Review Commission by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: North Carolina General Assembly
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780484385671
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 92
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Environmental Review Commission: Report to the 2003 General Assembly of North Carolina, 2004 Regular Session The Environmental Review Commission met seven times: 6 February 2004, 24 February 2004, 25 March 2004, 20 April 2004, 22 April 2004, 5 May 2004, and 11 May 2004. A meeting scheduled for 17 December 2003 was cancelled due to a scheduling conflict. A meeting scheduled for 27 January 2004 was cancelled due to inclement weather. The Commission also conducted three site visits during the interim. On 26 March 2004, members and staff of the Commission toured the Belews Creek Steam Station operated by Duke Energy in southeastern Stokes County. The purpose of the site visit was to observe the emissions reduction equipment installed at the facility to comply with federal Clean Air Act requirements and to also review Duke Energy's plans for complying with the Clean Smokestacks Act (s.l. 2002 In conjunction with the business meeting held on 22 April 2004, members and staff of the Commission toured Gorges State Park in Transylvania County on that day and Dupont State Forest in Transylvania and Henderson County on 23 April 2004. In fulfillment of its duty to provide legislative oversight of matters related to protection of the environment, environmental health, and conservation of natural resources, the Commission received numerous reports on various topics. A table that sets out the reports that are required to be made to the Commission, which reports have been received, and the disposition of those reports (presented orally before the Commission, or distributed to members of the Commission as read-only reports) is included in this report as Appendix I. A summary of the agenda items for each meeting follows below. In addition to the listed agenda items, the Commission Counsel presented an oral report and explanation of agenda items to the Commission at each meeting. Detailed minutes of each meeting, with attachments, are being prepared by Commission staff and will be available in the Legislative Library. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: North Carolina. General Assembly. Environmental Review Commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental law
Languages : en
Pages : 51
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Stuart L Hart
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 0429728182
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 387
Get Book Here
Book Description
Since the signing of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on January 1, 1970, eighteen states have initiated their own programs of compre-hensive environmental review. These State Environ-mental Policy Acts (SEPA's), or "NEPA equivalents," &re generally patterned after the policies, goals, and processes established by NEPA but, at the same time, demonstrate a great deal of variability in terms of extent as well as style of implementation. They are "equivalent," however, in the sense that they all utilize a similar tool--the environmental impact statement (EIS).
Author: North Carolina. General Assembly. Environmental Review Commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental law
Languages : en
Pages : 67
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: South Central Alabama Development Commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 102
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages : 280
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: North Carolina. General Assembly. Environmental Review Commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Resource allocation
Languages : en
Pages : 59
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309071275
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 178
Get Book Here
Book Description
In the three decades since the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was created, the agency's scientific and technical practices and credibility have been independently assessed many times in reports from the National Research Council (NRC), EPA Science Advisory Board, General Accounting Office, and many other organizations; in congressional oversight and judicial proceedings; and in countless criticisms and lawsuits from stakeholders with interests in particular EPA regulatory decisions. As a previous independent panel put it in the 1992 report Safeguarding the Future: Credible Science, Credible Decisions, EPA's policy and regulatory work receives a great deal of public attention, but the agency's scientific performance typically receives a similar degree of attention only when the scientific basis for a decision is questioned. Thus, strong scientific performance is important not only to enable EPA to make informed and effective decisions, but also to gain credibility and public support for the environmental protection efforts of EPA and the nation. This report is the fourth and final one in a series prepared by two independent expert committees convened by the NRC in response to a request from Congress and to subsequent, related requests from EPA. The Committee on Research Opportunities and Priorities for EPA-the companion committee in this study-was charged to provide an overview of significant emerging environmental issues, identify and prioritize research themes most relevant to understanding and resolving those issues, and consider the role of EPA's research program in the context of research being conducted or supported by other organizations. That committee published an interim report in 1996 and a final report, Building a Foundation for Sound Environmental Decisions, in 1997. The Committee on Research and Peer Review in EPA was charged to evaluate research management and scientific peer-review practices in the agency. The committee published an interim report in 1995 and this final report.
