Demographics and Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2009

Demographics and Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2009 PDF Author: U.S. Department of the Interior
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781497350557
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 42

Get Book Here

Book Description
Data from a long-term capture-recapture program were used to assess the status and dynamics of populations of two long-lived, federally endangered catostomids in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Lost River suckers (Deltistes luxatus) and shortnose suckers (Chasmistes brevirostris) have been captured and tagged with passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags during their spawning migrations in each year since 1995.

Demographics and 2008 Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2008

Demographics and 2008 Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2008 PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Catostomidae
Languages : en
Pages : 32

Get Book Here

Book Description


Demographics and Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2011

Demographics and Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2011 PDF Author: U.S. Department of the Interior
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781497389199
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 48

Get Book Here

Book Description
Data from a long-term capture-recapture program were used to assess the status and dynamics of populations of two long-lived, federally endangered catostomids in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Lost River suckers (Deltistes luxatus) and shortnose suckers (Chasmistes brevirostris) have been captured and tagged with passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags during their spawning migrations in each year since 1995. In addition, beginning in 2005, individuals that had been previously PIT-tagged were reencountered on remote underwater antennas deployed throughout sucker spawning areas. Captures and remote encounters during spring 2011 were used to describe the spawning migrations in that year and also were incorporated into capture-recapture analyses of population dynamics.

Demographics and Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Short Nose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2012

Demographics and Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Short Nose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2012 PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Lost River sucker
Languages : en
Pages : 43

Get Book Here

Book Description
Data from a long-term capture-recapture program were used to assess the status and dynamics of populations of two long-lived, federally endangered catostomids in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Lost River suckers (Deltistes luxatus) and shortnose suckers (Chasmistes brevirostris) have been captured and tagged with passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags during their spawning migrations in each year since 1995. In addition, beginning in 2005, individuals that had been previously PIT-tagged were re-encountered on remote underwater antennas deployed throughout sucker spawning areas. Captures and remote encounters during spring 2012 were used to describe the spawning migrations in that year and also were incorporated into capture-recapture analyses of population dynamics. Cormack-Jolly-Seber (CJS) open population capture-recapture models were used to estimate annual survival probabilities, and a reverse-time analog of the CJS model was used to estimate recruitment of new individuals into the spawning populations. In addition, data on the size composition of captured fish were examined to provide corroborating evidence of recruitment. Model estimates of survival and recruitment were used to derive estimates of changes in population size over time and to determine the status of the populations in 2011. Separate analyses were conducted for each species and also for each subpopulation of Lost River suckers (LRS). Shortnose suckers (SNS) and one subpopulation of LRS migrate into tributary rivers to spawn, whereas the other LRS subpopulation spawns at groundwater upwelling areas along the eastern shoreline of the lake. In 2012, we captured, tagged, and released 749 LRS at four lakeshore spawning areas and recaptured an additional 969 individuals that had been tagged in previous years. Across all four areas, the remote antennas detected 6,578 individual LRS during the spawning season. Spawning activity peaked in April and most individuals were encountered at Cinder Flats and Sucker Springs. In the Williamson River, we captured, tagged, and released 3,376 LRS and 299 SNS, and recaptured 551 LRS and 125 SNS that had been tagged in previous years. Remote PIT tag antennas in the traps at the weir on the Williamson River and remote antenna systems that spanned the river at four different locations on the Williamson and Sprague Rivers detected a total of 19,321 LRS and 6,124 SNS. Most LRS passed upstream between late April and mid-May when water temperatures were increasing and greater than 10 °C. In contrast, most upstream passage for SNS occurred in early and mid-May when water temperatures were increasing and near or greater than 12 °C. Finally, an additional 1,188 LRS and 1,665 SNS were captured in trammel net sampling at pre-spawn staging areas in the northeastern part of the lake. Of these, 291 of the LRS and 653 of the SNS had been PIT-tagged in previous years. For LRS captured at the staging areas that had encounter histories that were informative about their spawning location, over 90 percent of the fish were members of the subpopulation that spawns in the rivers. Capture-recapture analyses for the LRS subpopulation that spawns at the shoreline areas included encounter histories for more than 12,150 individuals, and analyses for the subpopulation that spawns in the rivers included more than 29,500 encounter histories. With a few exceptions, the survival of males and females in both subpopulations was high (greater than 0.9) between 1999 and 2010. Notably lower survival occurred for both sexes from the rivers in 2000, for both sexes from the shoreline areas in 2002, and for males from the rivers in 2006. Between 2001 and 2011, the abundance of males in the lakeshore spawning subpopulation decreased by 53-65 percent and the abundance of females decreased by 36-48 percent. Capture-recapture models suggested that the abundance of both sexes in the river spawning subpopulation of LRS had increased substantially since 2006; increases were due to large estimated recruitment events in 2006 and 2008. We know that the estimates in 2006 are substantially biased in favor of recruitment because of a sampling issue. We are skeptical of the magnitude of recruitment indicated by the 2008 estimates as well because (1) few small individuals that would indicate the presence of new recruits were captured in that year, and (2) recapture probabilities in recruitment models based on just physical recaptures were lower than desired for robust inferences from capture-recapture models. If we assume that little or no recruitment occurred in 2006 or 2008, the abundance of both sexes in the river spawning subpopulation likely has decreased at rates similar to the rates for the lakeshore spawning subpopulation between 2002 and 2011. Capture-recapture analyses for SNS included encounter histories for more than 17,700 individuals. Most annual survival estimates between 2001 and 2010 were high (greater than 0.8), but SNS experienced more years of low survival than either LRS subpopulation. Annual survival of both sexes was particularly low in 2001, 2004, and 2010. In addition, male survival was somewhat low in 2002. Capture-recapture models and size composition data indicate that recruitment of new individuals into the SNS spawning population was trivial between 2001 and 2005. Models indicate substantial recruitment of new individuals into the SNS spawning population in 2006, 2008, and 2009. As a result, capture-recapture modeling suggests that the abundance of adult spawning SNS was relatively stable between 2006 and 2010. We are skeptical of the estimated recruitment in 2006, 2008, and 2009 because few small individuals that would indicate the presence of new recruits were captured in any of those years, and recapture probabilities in recruitment models were low. The best-case scenario for SNS, based on capture-recapture recruitment modeling, indicates that the abundance of males in the spawning population decreased by 71 percent and the abundance of females decreased by 69 percent between 2001 and 2011. The worst-case scenario, which assumes no recruitment and seems more likely, suggests an 86 percent decrease for males and an 81 percent decrease for females. Despite relatively high survival in most years, we conclude that both species have experienced substantial declines in the abundance of spawning fish because losses from mortality have not been balanced by recruitment of new individuals. Although capture-recapture data indicate substantial recruitment of new individuals into the adult spawning populations for SNS and river spawning LRS in some years, size data do not corroborate these estimates. In fact, fork length data indicate that all populations are largely comprised of fish that were present in the late 1990s and early 2000s. As a result, the status of the endangered sucker populations in Upper Klamath Lake remains worrisome, and the situation is especially dire for shortnose suckers. Future investigations should explore the connections between sucker recruitment and survival and various environmental factors, such as water quality and disease. Our monitoring program provides a robust platform for estimating vital population parameters, evaluating the status of the populations, and assessing the effectiveness of conservation and recovery efforts.

Demographics and 2008 Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2008

Demographics and 2008 Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2008 PDF Author: U.S. Department of the Interior
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781497346239
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 40

Get Book Here

Book Description
We used capture–recapture data to assess population dynamics of endangered Lost River suckers (Deltistes luxatus) and shortnose suckers (Chasmistes brevirostris) in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. The Cormack–Jolly–Seber method was used to estimate apparent survival probabilities, and a temporal symmetry model was used to estimate annual seniority probabilities. Information theoretic modeling was used to assess variation in parameter estimates due to time, gender, and species. In addition, length data were used to detect multiple year-class failures and events of high recruitment into adult spawning populations. Survival of adult Lost River and shortnose suckers varied substantially across years. Relatively high annual mortality was observed for the lakeshore-spawning Lost River sucker subpopulation in 2002 and for the river spawning subpopulation in 2001.

Demographics and Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2011

Demographics and Run Timing of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2011 PDF Author: David A. Hewit
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Lost River sucker
Languages : en
Pages : 42

Get Book Here

Book Description


Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Sucker Recovery Plan

Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Sucker Recovery Plan PDF Author: Kevin Stubbs
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Catostomidae
Languages : en
Pages : 130

Get Book Here

Book Description


Biological/conference Opinion Regarding the Effects of Operation of the Bureau of Reclamation's Klamath Project on the Endangered Lost River Sucker (Deltistes Luxatus), Endangered Shortnose Sucker (Chasmistes Brevirostris), Threatened Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leucocephalus) and Proposed Critical Habitat for the Lost River/shortnose Suckers

Biological/conference Opinion Regarding the Effects of Operation of the Bureau of Reclamation's Klamath Project on the Endangered Lost River Sucker (Deltistes Luxatus), Endangered Shortnose Sucker (Chasmistes Brevirostris), Threatened Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leucocephalus) and Proposed Critical Habitat for the Lost River/shortnose Suckers PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bald eagle
Languages : en
Pages : 302

Get Book Here

Book Description


Age and Growth of Young-of-the-year Lost River Suckers Deltistes Luxatus and Shortnose Suckers Chasmistes Brevirostris of Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon

Age and Growth of Young-of-the-year Lost River Suckers Deltistes Luxatus and Shortnose Suckers Chasmistes Brevirostris of Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon PDF Author: Daniel Joseph Logan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Catostomidae
Languages : en
Pages : 164

Get Book Here

Book Description
Upper Klamath Lake in southern Oregon has two species of lacustrine suckers, Lost River sucker Deltistes luxatus and shortnose sucker Chasmistes brevirostris that were historically abundant. Results of surveys performed in the mid-1980's indicated that populations of both species were declining and ageing with apparent recruitment failure in most years since 1970. In 1988 both species were listed as endangered species and high priority has been placed on investigating recruitment of Upper Klamath Lake suckers. Lapilli are the preferred otolith for ageing suckers. Lapilli form predictably on the day of hatch, have the most conservative morphology of the three otoliths, and deposit easily discernable increments that begin on the day of hatch and proceed daily, and grow in a predictable relationship with somatic growth. Ages estimated by otolith analysis and resulting hatch dates of young-of-the-year Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker were consistent annually and consistent with reported spawning period for suckers from Upper Klamath Lake. Otolith increment analysis is necessarily lethal, whereas scale circuli analysis is not lethal. My findings suggest that scale circuli count is an inefficient estimator of daily Daily age estimates for age in young-of-the-year Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker. any given circuli count varied by approximately 51 days in Lost River sucker and 30 days Additionally, my results do not accurately predict the size or age at in shortnose sucker. which scales are formed, thereby invalidating an assumption of age and growth models. Consequently, scale circuli analysis cannot be used to produce accurate estimates of age or growth for young-of-the-year Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker. Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker achieve a relatively large size by the autumn of their first year, consistent with other members of Catostomidae. Interspecific difference in growth rates was evident in each year with Lost River sucker exhibiting faster growth than shortnose sucker in each year. Abundance of young-of-the-year suckers does not appear to be strongly correlated to somatic growth rate, though hatch date and environmental parameters are highly correlated with abundance. In both Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker, in years with the highest abundance (1991 and 1993), the mean hatch dates of surviving fish were later than in years with the lowest abundance. Also, young-of-the-year Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker experienced wide environmental fluctuations in Upper Klamath Lake as seasonal limnological and climatic variation create a dynamic habitat for young suckers. Water temperature, precipitation, air temperature, and minimum lake elevation are all strongly correlated to abundance of young-of-the-year suckers.

Status and Trends of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Sucker Populations in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2015

Status and Trends of Adult Lost River (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose (Chasmistes Brevirostris) Sucker Populations in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2015 PDF Author: David A. Hewit
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Lost River sucker
Languages : en
Pages : 38

Get Book Here

Book Description