Deciding cases without argument PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Deciding cases without argument PDF full book. Access full book title Deciding cases without argument by Joe S. Cecil. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Joe S. Cecil
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Joe S. Cecil
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781590318737
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 216
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.
Author: Timothy R. Johnson
Publisher: SUNY Press
ISBN: 9780791461037
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 200
Get Book Here
Book Description
How oral arguments influence the decisions of Supreme Court justices.
Author: United States. Court of Appeals (District of Columbia Circuit)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Appellate procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 12
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Bryan A. Garner
Publisher: West Academic Publishing
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 292
Get Book Here
Book Description
In this eminently browsable book, Bryan A. Garner has collected and arranged the most important, interesting, and penetrating statements from judges and lawyers about how to conduct an oral argument. Each didactic principle is stated, briefly explained, and then illustrated with quotations from a dazzling array of sources, ancient and modern. Novices and veterans alike will find helpful advice in these pages, which systematically explain the subtleties of the art more lucidly than any previous work has done.
Author: Robert L. Stern
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 738
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Department of Justice
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Justice, Administration of
Languages : en
Pages : 720
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Donna Stienstra
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Appellate courts
Languages : en
Pages : 80
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kelly Stephen Searl
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Court rules
Languages : en
Pages : 520
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Robert A. Katzmann
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199362149
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 184
Get Book Here
Book Description
In an ideal world, the laws of Congress--known as federal statutes--would always be clearly worded and easily understood by the judges tasked with interpreting them. But many laws feature ambiguous or even contradictory wording. How, then, should judges divine their meaning? Should they stick only to the text? To what degree, if any, should they consult aids beyond the statutes themselves? Are the purposes of lawmakers in writing law relevant? Some judges, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, believe courts should look to the language of the statute and virtually nothing else. Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit respectfully disagrees. In Judging Statutes, Katzmann, who is a trained political scientist as well as a judge, argues that our constitutional system charges Congress with enacting laws; therefore, how Congress makes its purposes known through both the laws themselves and reliable accompanying materials should be respected. He looks at how the American government works, including how laws come to be and how various agencies construe legislation. He then explains the judicial process of interpreting and applying these laws through the demonstration of two interpretative approaches, purposivism (focusing on the purpose of a law) and textualism (focusing solely on the text of the written law). Katzmann draws from his experience to show how this process plays out in the real world, and concludes with some suggestions to promote understanding between the courts and Congress. When courts interpret the laws of Congress, they should be mindful of how Congress actually functions, how lawmakers signal the meaning of statutes, and what those legislators expect of courts construing their laws. The legislative record behind a law is in truth part of its foundation, and therefore merits consideration.
