Correctional Rehabilitation Study Act of 1965 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Correctional Rehabilitation Study Act of 1965 PDF full book. Access full book title Correctional Rehabilitation Study Act of 1965 by United States. Congress. Senate. Labor and Public Welfare. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Labor and Public Welfare
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 200
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Labor and Public Welfare
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 200
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Labor and Public Welfare. Subcommittee on Employment, Manpower, and Poverty
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Correctional personnel
Languages : en
Pages : 204
Get Book Here
Book Description
Considers S. 1807 and S. 1920, to authorize an HEW-funded study of manpower and training needs in the field of correctional rehabilitation.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Special Subcommittee on Education
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminals
Languages : en
Pages : 102
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Francis T. Cullen
Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub
ISBN: 9781478262503
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Get Book Here
Book Description
A theme that has persisted throughout the history of American corrections is that efforts should be made to reform offenders. In particular, at the beginning of the 1900s, the rehabilitative ideal was enthusiastically trumpeted and helped to direct the renovation of the correctional system (e.g., implementation of indeterminate sentencing, parole, probation, a separate juvenile justice system). For the next seven decades, offender treatment reigned as the dominant correctional philosophy. Then, in the early 1970s, rehabilitation suffered a precipitous reversal of fortune. The larger disruptions in American society in this era prompted a general critique of the “state run” criminal justice system. Rehabilitation was blamed by liberals for allowing the state to act coercively against offenders, and was blamed by conservatives for allowing the state to act leniently toward offenders. In this context, the death knell of rehabilitation was seemingly sounded by Robert Martinson's (1974b) influential “nothing works” essay, which reported that few treatment programs reduced recidivism. This review of evaluation studies gave legitimacy to the antitreatment sentiments of the day; it ostensibly “proved” what everyone “already knew”: Rehabilitation did not work. In the subsequent quarter century, a growing revisionist movement has questioned Martinson's portrayal of the empirical status of the effectiveness of treatment interventions. Through painstaking literature reviews, these revisionist scholars have shown that many correctional treatment programs are effective in decreasing recidivism. More recently, they have undertaken more sophisticated quantitative syntheses of an increasing body of evaluation studies through a technique called “meta-analysis.” These meta-analyses reveal that across evaluation studies, the recidivism rate is, on average, 10 percentage points lower for the treatment group than for the control group. However, this research has also suggested that some correctional interventions have no effect on offender criminality (e.g., punishment-oriented programs), while others achieve substantial reductions in recidivism (i.e., approximately 25 percent). This variation in program success has led to a search for those “principles” that distinguish effective treatment interventions from ineffective ones. There is theoretical and empirical support for the conclusion that the rehabilitation programs that achieve the greatest reductions in recidivism use cognitive-behavioral treatments, target known predictors of crime for change, and intervene mainly with high-risk offenders. “Multisystemic treatment” is a concrete example of an effective program that largely conforms to these principles. In the time ahead, it would appear prudent that correctional policy and practice be “evidence based.” Knowledgeable about the extant research, policymakers would embrace the view that rehabilitation programs, informed by the principles of effective intervention, can “work” to reduce recidivism and thus can help foster public safety. By reaffirming rehabilitation, they would also be pursuing a policy that is consistent with public opinion research showing that Americans continue to believe that offender treatment should be an integral goal of the correctional system.
Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Agricultural education work
Languages : en
Pages : 632
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Public health
Languages : en
Pages : 642
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Executive departments
Languages : en
Pages : 1668
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Departments of Labor, and Health, Education, and Welfare, and Related Agencies
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 648
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1838
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House Appropriations
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 656
Get Book Here
Book Description
