Constitutional Dialogue as the Justification for Judicial Review PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Constitutional Dialogue as the Justification for Judicial Review PDF full book. Access full book title Constitutional Dialogue as the Justification for Judicial Review by Trevor R. S. Allan. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Trevor R. S. Allan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Trevor R. S. Allan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: T. R. S. Allan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The lively debate over the constitutional foundations of judicial review has been marred by a formalism which obscures its point and value. Abstracted from genuine issues of substance, the rival positions offer inadequate accounts of the legitimacy of judicial review; constitutional theory must regain its connection with questions of political principle and moral value. Although the critics of ultra vires have rightly emphasized the foundational role of the common law, they have misconceived its nature and implications. On the one hand, they have invited the charge of judicial supremacism by marginalizing the role of legislative intent; on the other, their affirmation of absolute parliamentary sovereignty (within the context of this debate) undermines the critique of ultra vires. In substance, therefore, the rival camps occupy essentially the same ground, equally trapped by a formalism that entrenches a stark confrontation between parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law. A conception of shared sovereignty, or interdependent sovereignties, provides a better foundation for judicial review.
Author: Geoffrey Sigalet
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1108417582
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 487
Get Book Here
Book Description
Identifies how and why 'dialogue' can describe and evaluate institutional interactions over constitutional questions concerning democracy and rights.
Author: Po Jen Yap
Publisher: OUP Oxford
ISBN: 019105593X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 273
Get Book Here
Book Description
In a comprehensive examination of the constitutional systems of Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Singapore, Po Jen Yap contributes to a field that has traditionally focussed on Western jurisdictions. Drawing on the history and constitutional framework of these Asian law systems, this book examines the political structures and traditions that were inherited from the British colonial government and the major constitutional developments since decolonization. Yap examines the judicial crises that have occurred in each of the three jurisdictions and explores the development of sub-constitutional doctrines that allows the courts to preserve the right of the legislature to disagree with the courts' decisions using the ordinary political processes. The book focusses on how these novel judicial techniques can be applied to four core constitutional concerns: freedom of expression, freedom of religion, right to equality, and criminal due process rights. Each chapter examines one core topic and defends a model of dialogic judicial review that offers a compelling alternative to legislative or judicial supremacy.
Author: Louis Fisher
Publisher: Princeton University Press
ISBN: 1400859573
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 317
Get Book Here
Book Description
Who makes constitutional law? Is constitutional doctrine the monopoly of the courts? In accessible and persuasive prose Louis Fisher explains that constitutional law is not solely or even primarily the Supreme Court's "final word" but rather a richly political convergence of separate interpretations. With a broad range of examples, he argues that constitutional principles emerge from a dialogue among all three branches of government--executive, legislative, and judicial. Important contributions also come from the states and the general public. Fisher identifies executive and legislative initiatives in many areas of constitutional significance. Where there is litigation, the Court generally upholds these initiatives or may avoid making a constitutional decision by using "threshold devices." On those rare occasions when the Supreme Court exercises judicial review and strikes down a presidential or congressional action, it is usually only a matter of time before the proposal is revived and the dialogue begins again. Originally published in 1988. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
Author: John Agresto
Publisher: Cornell University Press
ISBN: 9780801492778
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 188
Get Book Here
Book Description
Discusses the growth of the power of the Supreme Court and analyzes the separation of judicial and congressional functions.
Author: Thomas Bustamante
Publisher: Springer
ISBN: 3319283715
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 330
Get Book Here
Book Description
This volume critically discusses the relationship between democracy and constitutionalism. It does so with a view to respond to objections raised by legal and political philosophers who are sceptical of judicial review based on the assumption that judicial review is an undemocratic institution. The book builds on earlier literature on the moral justification of the authority of constitutional courts, and on the current attempts to develop a system on “weak judicial review”. Although different in their approach, the chapters all focus on devising institutions, procedures and, in a more abstract way, normative conceptions to democratize constitutional law. These democratizing strategies may vary from a radical objection to the institution of judicial review, to a more modest proposal to justify the authority of constitutional courts in their “deliberative performance” or to create constitutional juries that may be more aware of a community’s constitutional morality than constitutional courts are. The book connects abstract theoretical discussions about the moral justification of constitutionalism with concrete problems, such as the relation between constitutional adjudication and deliberative democracy, the legitimacy of judicial review in international institutions, the need to create new institutions to democratize constitutionalism, the connections between philosophical conceptions and constitutional practices, the judicial review of constitutional amendments, and the criticism on strong judicial review.
![Models of Democratic Dialogue and the Justification for Judicial Review [microform] PDF](https://books.google.com/books/content/images/frontcover/lWGUtgAACAAJ?fife=w80-h100)
Author: Stephen J. (Stephen Joseph) Moreau
Publisher: Library and Archives Canada = Bibliothèque et Archives Canada
ISBN: 9780612954366
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 294
Get Book Here
Book Description
Under the Charter, scholars have obsessed over the idea of reconciling judicial interpretations of the constitution with democracy. Dialogue theory postulates that judicial review is undemocratic but that, because of mechanisms found in the Charter, there is room for the legislature to respond to decisions striking down legislation. Dialogue theory suggests that judicial review is reconcilable with democracy because the word of an undemocratic group of judges is rarely final. In this thesis, the author critically examines dialogue theory and rejects it as a valid democratic defense to judicial review. He demonstrates how the Charter does not produce real dialogue and shows how dialogue theory both fails to provide an adequate definition to indicate what is democratic or dialogic about the legislative response process and incorrectly focuses on the nature of the legislative actors to justify judicial review. The author concludes with his own theory reconciling the Charter with democracy.
Author: Mark Elliott
Publisher: Hart Publishing
ISBN: 1841131806
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 293
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book comprehensively analyses the foundations of judicial review.
Author: Martin Belov
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1000707970
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 201
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book examines how the judicialization of politics, and the politicization of courts, affect representative democracy, rule of law, and separation of powers. This volume critically assesses the phenomena of judicialization of politics and politicization of the judiciary. It explores the rising impact of courts on key constitutional principles, such as democracy and separation of powers, which is paralleled by increasing criticism of this influence from both liberal and illiberal perspectives. The book also addresses the challenges to rule of law as a principle, preconditioned on independent and powerful courts, which are triggered by both democratic backsliding and the mushrooming of populist constitutionalism and illiberal constitutional regimes. Presenting a wide range of case studies, the book will be a valuable resource for students and academics in constitutional law and political science seeking to understand the increasingly complex relationships between the judiciary, executive and legislature.
