Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 636
Book Description
Cable Compulsory License
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 636
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 636
Book Description
Copyright Liability for Cable Television
Author: Stanley M. Besen
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cable television
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cable television
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Book Description
Cable and Satellite Carrier Compulsory Licenses
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 144
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 144
Book Description
The Cable and Satellite Carrier Compulsory Licenses
Author: Library of Congress. Copyright Office
Publisher: Library of Congress
ISBN: 9780160361647
Category : Cable television
Languages : en
Pages : 222
Book Description
Publisher: Library of Congress
ISBN: 9780160361647
Category : Cable television
Languages : en
Pages : 222
Book Description
The Copyright Office Report on Compulsory Licensing of Broadcast Signals
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 152
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 152
Book Description
Copyright Licensing in a Digital Age
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 172
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 172
Book Description
Cable Copyright and Consumer Welfare
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cable television
Languages : en
Pages : 128
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cable television
Languages : en
Pages : 128
Book Description
Statements of Account Covering Compulsory Licenses for Secondary Transmissions by Cable Systems
Author: Library of Congress. Copyright Office. Licensing Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Broadcasting
Languages : en
Pages : 12
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Broadcasting
Languages : en
Pages : 12
Book Description
Cable and Satellite Carrier Compulsory Licenses
Author: United States Congress House Committe
Publisher: Palala Press
ISBN: 9781342080233
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 144
Book Description
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Publisher: Palala Press
ISBN: 9781342080233
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 144
Book Description
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
After Aereo
Author: Jake Makar
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
As Internet technology has advanced, consumers have increasingly opted to view video content on their computer, tablet, and smartphone screens instead of their television screens. In American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc. (“Aereo III”), decided in 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected one of the more creative methods of delivering content via the Internet, closing a legal loophole by ruling that a company could not escape copyright liability by characterizing its retransmission of content as simply providing the consumer with equipment. Although the ruling definitively answered one question that had been subject to debate, the battle over Internet broadcasting has simply moved to another arena. The decision has led Aereo and similar companies to argue that they should be allowed to take advantage of the compulsory licensing scheme available to “cable systems” under Section 111 of the Copyright Act. The result of this new debate could have far-reaching effects on how consumers can access television content and on how the courts will interpret the Copyright Act in the future. This Note examines the decisions made in the wake of Aereo III that have addressed the application of Section 111 and, in particular, contrasts the reasoning of Fox v. Aereokiller, in which the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California held that Internet rebroadcasting services are eligible for a compulsory license under Section 111, with the reasoning of courts that have come to the opposite conclusion. This Note argues that both the text of Section 111 and its legislative history demonstrate that Internet rebroadcasting services fall under the statutory definition of “cable system.” It further argues that granting access to the compulsory licensing scheme would accomplish the important policy goal of increasing competition in the marketplace.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
As Internet technology has advanced, consumers have increasingly opted to view video content on their computer, tablet, and smartphone screens instead of their television screens. In American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc. (“Aereo III”), decided in 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected one of the more creative methods of delivering content via the Internet, closing a legal loophole by ruling that a company could not escape copyright liability by characterizing its retransmission of content as simply providing the consumer with equipment. Although the ruling definitively answered one question that had been subject to debate, the battle over Internet broadcasting has simply moved to another arena. The decision has led Aereo and similar companies to argue that they should be allowed to take advantage of the compulsory licensing scheme available to “cable systems” under Section 111 of the Copyright Act. The result of this new debate could have far-reaching effects on how consumers can access television content and on how the courts will interpret the Copyright Act in the future. This Note examines the decisions made in the wake of Aereo III that have addressed the application of Section 111 and, in particular, contrasts the reasoning of Fox v. Aereokiller, in which the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California held that Internet rebroadcasting services are eligible for a compulsory license under Section 111, with the reasoning of courts that have come to the opposite conclusion. This Note argues that both the text of Section 111 and its legislative history demonstrate that Internet rebroadcasting services fall under the statutory definition of “cable system.” It further argues that granting access to the compulsory licensing scheme would accomplish the important policy goal of increasing competition in the marketplace.