Attorney General Opinion No. 1982-187 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Attorney General Opinion No. 1982-187 PDF full book. Access full book title Attorney General Opinion No. 1982-187 by Robert T. Stephan. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The increased penalty provisions of K.S.A. 21-4501 (as amended by L. 1982, ch. 137, section 1) and K.S.A. 21-4608, (as amended by L. 1982, ch. 150, section 1) do not apply to crimes committed before July 1, 1982 (the effective date of the amendments), but are applicable to sentencing for crimes committed after July 1, 1982. The term "conditional release," as used in K.S.A. 21-4608 (as amended), refers to release from incarceration, subject to rules and conditions imposed by the releasing authority, following imprisonment for the maximum term imposed, minus work and good behavior credits. Cited herein: K.S.A. 21-4501 (as amended by L. 1982, ch. 137, section 1), 21-4608 (as amended by L. 1982, ch. 150, section 1), 22-3718, U.S. Const., Art. I, section 9.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The increased penalty provisions of K.S.A. 21-4501 (as amended by L. 1982, ch. 137, section 1) and K.S.A. 21-4608, (as amended by L. 1982, ch. 150, section 1) do not apply to crimes committed before July 1, 1982 (the effective date of the amendments), but are applicable to sentencing for crimes committed after July 1, 1982. The term "conditional release," as used in K.S.A. 21-4608 (as amended), refers to release from incarceration, subject to rules and conditions imposed by the releasing authority, following imprisonment for the maximum term imposed, minus work and good behavior credits. Cited herein: K.S.A. 21-4501 (as amended by L. 1982, ch. 137, section 1), 21-4608 (as amended by L. 1982, ch. 150, section 1), 22-3718, U.S. Const., Art. I, section 9.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The formula for apportioning revenue from a countywide retailers' sales tax, as prescribed by K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 12-192, may not be altered through the exercise of home rule powers by a city or county. The question of imposing a countywide retailers' sales tax, and the question of imposing a city retailers' sales tax, may be included on the same ballot, provided the ballot meets the segregation requirements imposed by K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 10-120. A city may not provide for the "automatic repeal" of a city retailers' sales tax upon the adoption of a countywide retailers' sales tax, since such a provision would be in obvious conflict with subsection (e) of K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 12-187. Once an election is called to submit the proposition of imposing a city retailers' tax to the voters, and notice of such election is published pursuant to K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 10-120, the election must proceed pursuant to the provisions of K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 12-187(e), and a city may not withdraw the proposition and abort the election process. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 10-120, 12-187, 12-188, 12-192, 12-194, 12-195, K.S.A. 19-101a, Kan. Const., Art. 12, section 5.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The enactment of 1980 Senate Bill No. 657 would have rendered charitable organizations immune from negligence suits resulting from their distribution of free food which caused death or personal injury when consumed. The measure also would have granted similar immunity to the donors of such food, but in neither case would such immunity have extended to harm stemming from gross negligence, recklessness or intentional misconduct. Such grants of immunity are in violation of Section 18 of the Kansas Bill of Rights, which guarantees all persons who suffer injury a remedy by due course of law, and would therefore be unconstitutional if enacted. Cited herein: K.S.A. 84-2-314, 84-2-315, Sec. 18, Kansas Bill of Rights.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
A register of deeds is required to file of record a written instrument whereby real estate may be affected. Such filing can properly be refused only if the instrument contains apparent errors, or is not proved or acknowledged, and certified in the manner prescribed by law, or the register of deeds has been directed by a court not to file the instrument. Of course, a register of deeds also may refuse to file instruments that clearly do not affect real estate, or where the law requires some act, such as payment of the mortgage registration fee, before the instrument may be received and filed of record. Cited herein: K.S.A. 58-2221.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
As amended by chapter 282, section 5, the provisions of chapter 187, section 11 of the 1984 Session Laws prohibit the selling, giving or receiving of lists of names and addresses derived from public records, for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or service to the persons listed therein, subject to three exceptions. Section 6 of chapter 187, as amended by section 3 of chapter 282 of the 1984 Session Laws, further requires that any person who obtains a list of names and addresses certify that: (1) he or she will not use the information for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or services, and (2) will not give, sell or otherwise make available the list to another person so that the latter may sell or offer for sale any property or service. Accordingly, a person may not make commercial use of information derived from such lists, either directly or through the sale of the lists themselves. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 21-3913; 45-201 (both repealed, L. 1984, ch. 187); 74-2012, as amended by L. 1984, ch. 282, section l; L. 1983, ch. 171, section 11, L. 1984, ch. 187, sections 6, 11; L. 1984, ch. 282, sections 3, 5.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Neither K.S.A. 12-1222 nor the common law doctrine of incompatibility of offices precludes a person from simultaneously being the county register of deeds and a member of a city's library board. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-1218 and 12-1222.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
A contract which determines the custody of a child is void as against public policy. Cited herein: K.S.A. 23-128, 23-129, 23-130.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The common law doctrine of incompatibility of offices precludes one person from simultaneously holding the offices of city manager and city treasurer in a city of the second class having a commission-manager form of government. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-1001, 12-1011, 12-1014, 12-1024.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The common law doctrine of incompatibility of offices precludes one person from simultaneously holding the offices of city councilman in a city of the third class and a township officer in the township which contains such city. Attorney General Opinion No. 75-50 is withdrawn. Cited herein: K.S.A. 15-104, 25-1606, 80-1502, L. 1982, ch. 63.
Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 8-1567(c), as amended by section 5 of Senate Bill No. 699, establishes penalties for persons convicted of their first violation of the statute. Prior to the 1982 amendment, the subsection authorized a court to punish first time violators by imposing a specified jail sentence or a specified fine, "or by both such fine and imprisonment." In the amended statute, the word "and" replaces the word "or" between the term of imprisonment and the amount of the fine, although the phrase "or by both such fine and imprisonment" is retained. In that the intent of the legislature in altering the disjunctive "or" to the conjunctive "and" was to require both forms of punishment, the additional phrase allowing such is now mere verbiage, and adds nothing to the statute. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 8-1567, as amended by L. 1982, ch. 144, section 5.
