An Analysis of Perceptions from Selected School District Administrators and School Board Presidents in the Five Northwestern States Concerning the Impact of the 1981 Education Consolidation and Improvement Act PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download An Analysis of Perceptions from Selected School District Administrators and School Board Presidents in the Five Northwestern States Concerning the Impact of the 1981 Education Consolidation and Improvement Act PDF full book. Access full book title An Analysis of Perceptions from Selected School District Administrators and School Board Presidents in the Five Northwestern States Concerning the Impact of the 1981 Education Consolidation and Improvement Act by Steven A. Schmitz. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Steven A. Schmitz
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Federal aid to education
Languages : en
Pages : 332
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Steven A. Schmitz
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Federal aid to education
Languages : en
Pages : 332
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertations, Academic
Languages : en
Pages : 520
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertation abstracts
Languages : en
Pages : 540
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertations, Academic
Languages : en
Pages : 780
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Canada
Languages : en
Pages : 1314
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Robert Joseph Ackell
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 300
Get Book Here
Book Description
This mixed methods triangulation approach examined the perceptions of administrators, teachers, parents, and community residents about a consideration of a secondary school consolidation in a school district in central Pennsylvania. These groups are referred to as "stakeholders" in this study. The purpose of this research was to develop an understanding about perceptions of stakeholders regarding the potential effects of consolidating two high schools in a school district in central Pennsylvania. Specifically, this study provides school administrators with effects described by stakeholders as advantages and disadvantages. This information could be used to assist administrators and boards of education in making decisions in regard to consolidating the two high schools as a possible means of providing cost effective education. The process through which school boards and school administrators must maneuver to reach a decision must take into account several factors that are drawn from the stakeholders in the affected attendance areas. This research used the perspective of situational leadership theory and Albert Bandura's theory of self-efficacy theoretical frameworks. Data was collected through interviews and a questionnaire. A small convenience sample of stakeholders participated. This study provides background knowledge if a school district is preparing for consolidating two high schools in a School District. The findings of the study are based on the survey and interview data returned by 109 stakeholders in a school district in Central Pennsylvania. Few questions garnered complete agreement, as would be expected with a complex topic that has multiple concerns involved. Results from the initial inquiry indicated that 38.4% of stakeholders in one school district in Central Pennsylvania would approve of consolidating two high schools into one. The stakeholders acknowledged that the broader course offerings and opportunities in athletics and extra-curricular activities may be good for the students. Likewise, stakeholders stated that the school and community loyalties along with travel time were a possible disadvantage. Stakeholders recognized the possibility of less individual attention for the students and the loss of some sense of community that the two high schools provided for their home area as a concern. The primary purpose of consolidation of schools should be to enhance student achievement although schools could anticipate possible budgetary savings, as well as the overall improved student achievement due to expanded curriculum.
Author: Daniel M. Erceg
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Educational change
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
School districts throughout the United States may be forced to consider school closures based on a variety of factors. New York State has struggled financially due to the Great Recession that began in December of 2007 (Alvi, 2017). In addition, New York State has seen a reduction of over 165,000 students since 2010 (New York State Education Department, n.d.-b). School consolidation continues to be a proposed solution to decreased enrollment, financial stress, poor academic outcomes, and infrastructure concerns (Green, 2013; Larsen, 2020; Steinberg & MacDonald, 2019). Existing research lacks specific information on whether schools are actively planning for programmatic changes to enhance the education of their students. The purpose of this comparative case study was to understand the perceived programmatic changes and academic benefits associated with school consolidation for urban-suburban, rural, and small city school districts in New York State through interviews with superintendents, building and district administrators, and board of education members involved with their district's transition. One-on-one interviews were conducted with eight participants in three districts who consolidated in the five years prior to the start of this study. The overall findings indicated student enrollment, financial stress, academic improvement, and resource efficacy were the primary factors driving consolidation in participating districts. Participants in one out of three districts identified the same primary justification for the district's consolidation. An analysis of interviews with eight district leaders indicated all three districts described actions embodying the first four steps in Kotter's (2012) eight-step process for leading change. The first four steps included: (a) establishing a sense of urgency, (b) creating a guiding coalition, (c) developing a vision and strategy, and (d) communicating the change vision. Participants verbalized their consolidation efforts were successful but were unable to articulate specific indicators to support their assertion. In the study, six out of eight participants described an increase in collaboration between staff and consistency in academic expectations, and five out of eight participants identified new opportunities for students. Finally, three out of eight participants identified unintentional benefits that resulted from the consolidation efforts such as additional programming, a greater sense of community, and an increased focus on social emotional learning. Several recommendations came from this research, beginning with the need for the New York State Education Department to create a definition of school consolidation and begin to track school consolidation in an effective and efficient manner. School districts may benefit from the creation of guiding coalitions to support future change efforts and to create a vision for the district. The guiding coalition could support communication efforts and establish indicators of success. Recommendations for future research are suggested.
Author: Roberta Block
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 504
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: National Commission on School District Reorganization
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Rural schools
Languages : en
Pages : 294
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Linda Darling-Hammond
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780833004918
Category : Educational law and legislation
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
The 1981 Education Consolidation and Improvement Act (ECIA) is part of the Reagan Administration's "new federalism." This study, based on personal interviews with officials in nine states, examined decisionmaking as state officials planned for their new responsibilities under the ECIA. State departments of education, state legislatures, and, in some cases, state boards of education will play a larger role in decisions about fund allocations for the ECIA than in the past. In most states, the block grant portion of the law will result in a redistribution of funds away from urban areas and low-income students, although some states have attempted to minimize this effect. Decreased levels of funding for ECIA programs will reduce services offered by most state departments of education. Previous federal financial support for research and development and for desegregation is no longer earmarked. Finally, many state officials find their decisionmaking flexibility constrained by the absence of compliance standards in law or regulation.
