A Critical Look at Several Assumptions Underlying the Trial Procedure with Particular Reference to the Rule Against Hearsay PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download A Critical Look at Several Assumptions Underlying the Trial Procedure with Particular Reference to the Rule Against Hearsay PDF full book. Access full book title A Critical Look at Several Assumptions Underlying the Trial Procedure with Particular Reference to the Rule Against Hearsay by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: J R Spencer
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing
ISBN: 1782252932
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 508
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Criminal Justice Act 2003 re-wrote the hearsay evidence rule for the purpose of criminal proceedings, enacting the recommendations of the Law Commission together with some proposals from the Auld Review. In 2008, Professor Spencer wrote a book explaining the new law, intended for practitioners as well as academics. Following the style of his earlier book about the new law on bad character evidence, the core of the hearsay book was a section-by-section commentary on the relevant provisions of the Act, discussing the case law that had interpreted them. Since the appearance of the first edition, the new law on hearsay evidence has been the subject of a spectacular exchange between the UK Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights, the effects of which the Court of Appeal has interpreted in several leading cases. In this new edition, the commentary is revised to take account of these developments. As in the first edition, the commentary is preceded by chapters on the history of the hearsay rule, and the requirements of Article 6(3)(d) of the European Convention on Human Rights. It is followed by an appendix containing the text of the statutory provisions and a selection of the leading cases.
Author: American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781590318737
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 216
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.
Author: Irving Younger
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Evidence, Hearsay
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Landmark Publications
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 538
Get Book Here
Book Description
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret, and discuss the rule against hearsay. See Fed. R. Evid. 802-807. Volume 1 of the casebook covers the District of Columbia Circuit and the First through the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement that is inadmissible at trial to establish the truth thereof. See FED. R. EVID. 801(c) (defining hearsay); FED. R. EVID. 802 (hearsay generally inadmissible). The hearsay rule is rooted in the belief that an out-of-court statement lacks necessary assurances of veracity. See Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S. 594, 598, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 129 L.Ed.2d 476 (1994) ("The hearsay rule ... is premised on the theory that out-of-court statements are subject to particular hazards."). With any statement, a "declarant might be lying; he might have misperceived the events which he relates; he might have faulty memory; [or] his words might be misunderstood or taken out of context by the listener." Id. To avoid these shortcomings, our judicial system chooses in-court statements that can be tested by "the oath, the witness' awareness of the gravity of the proceedings, the jury's ability to observe the witness' demeanor, and, most importantly, the right of the opponent to cross-examine." Id. Admitting hearsay would prevent opposing parties, and our judicial system as a whole, from using these checks. United States v. Evans, 216 F.3d 80, 85 (D.C. Cir. 2000) ("The problem with hearsay is that it deprives the defendant of the opportunity to cross-examine the person who uttered the statement at issue."). "Nonetheless, the Federal Rules of Evidence also recognize that some kinds of out-of-court statements are less subject to these hearsay dangers, and therefore except them from the general rule that hearsay is inadmissible." Williamson, 512 U.S. at 598, 114 S.Ct. 2431. The enumerated exceptions apply to hearsay that possesses certain guarantees of trustworthiness. See FED. R. EVID. 803-04 (enumerating exceptions and exclusions to hearsay rule). US v. Slatten, 865 F. 3d 767 (DC Cir. 2017)
Author: Andrew L.-T. Choo
Publisher: Oxford Monographs on Criminal
ISBN: 9780198258919
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
The law of Criminal Hearsay is one of the most controversial and topical areas of English law today. Following closely on the heels of the publication of the Law Commission's consultation paper on Criminal Hearsay, this timely book takes a critical look at the operation of the Hearsay rule incriminal trials on indictment in England. In addition, an examination of the legal position in a number of other jurisdictions (especially Canada, Australia, and the United States) is undertaken at appropriate points in the text. The author examines possible rationale for the Hearsay rule,challenging traditional notions that the rule in criminal proceedings exists simply to safeguard the reliability of evidence. A critical review of some of the relevant psychological research is also undertaken. Included in the book, too, is a discussion of some possible options for reform, includingthe suggestions made by the Law Commission in its consultation papers.
Author: LandMark Publications
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781520500515
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 596
Get Book Here
Book Description
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret and discuss the rule against hearsay and its exceptions. The selection of decisions spans from 2013 to the date of publication.A proponent of hearsay evidence must establish five elements in order to satisfy Rule 807: "(1) circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness; (2) materiality; (3) probative value; (4) the interests of justice; and (5) notice." United States v. Ochoa, 229 F.3d 631, 638 (7th Cir. 2000) (citing United States v. Hall, 165 F.3d 1095, 1110 (7th Cir. 1999)). US v. Moore, (7th Cir. 2016).Rule 807 provides that a hearsay statement is not excluded by the rule against hearsay, even if not covered by an exception in Rule 803 or 804, if the statement (1) has "equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness" to statements admitted under the enumerated exceptions, (2) is offered as evidence of a material fact, (3) is more probative on the point offered than any other reasonably available evidence, and (4) will best serve the general purposes of the rules of evidence and the interests of justice. We have said that this exception to the rule against hearsay "was necessary to permit courts to admit evidence in exceptional circumstances where the evidence was necessary, highly probative, and carried a guarantee of trustworthiness equivalent to or superior to that which underlies the other recognized exceptions." United States v. Renville, 779 F.2d 430, 439 (8th Cir. 1985). US v. Stoney End of Horn, (8th Cir. 2016). * * *"[P]rior inconsistent statements by a witness are not hearsay and are competent as substantive evidence if the declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the prior inconsistent statement was given under oath at a 'trial, hearing, or other proceeding.'" United States v. Wilson, 806 F.2d 171, 175-76 (8th Cir. 1986) (quoting Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(1)(A)). "The district court has considerable discretion in determining whether prior statements are inconsistent with trial testimony." United States v. Matlock, 109 F.3d 1313, 1319 (8th Cir. 1997) (citing United States v. Russell, 712 F.2d 1256, 1258 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam); United States v. Thompson, 708 F.2d 1294, 1302 (8th Cir. 1983) ("The district court should have considerable discretion to determine whether evasive answers are inconsistent with statements previously given." (citation omitted))). US v. Dean, (8th Cir. 2016). * * *Federal Rule of Evidence 801 provides that a statement offered against a party is not hearsay if the statement was "made by the party's coconspirator during and in furtherance of the conspiracy." Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E). Statements can further the conspiracy in a number of ways. "Some examples include comments designed to assist in recruiting potential members, to inform other members about the progress of the conspiracy, to control damage to or detection of the conspiracy, to hide the criminal objectives of the conspiracy, or to instill confidence and prevent the desertion of other members." Johnson, 200 F.3d at 533. A coconspirator's statement may satisfy the "in furtherance" requirement even if the statement was not "exclusively, or even primarily, made to further the conspiracy." United States v. Cruz-Rea, 626 F.3d 929, 937 (7th Cir. 2010). US v. Elder, (7th Cir. 2016).
Author: Clifford S. Fishman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 302
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: John L. Conlon
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 372
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Evidence, Expert
Languages : en
Pages : 652
Get Book Here
Book Description
